On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:43:15PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Martin,
>
> could you please check this beamer layout?
>
> # Theorems and such section
> Style Corollary
>
> LatexName corollary}%{
> LabelString "Corollary_"
>
> End
>
> Is this "_"
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> You should use _only_ the files from the local TeX
Herbert> distribution! The configure script should be able to test
Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp> kpsewhich powerdot.layout
Herbert>
/usr/local/texlive/2005/../texmf-local/tex
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> With the following "controversy" IÃ'd say "no" to insert
Lars> beamer.layout in LyX for 1.4.0
Definitely.
People who want this inclusion to happen for 1.4.1 or 1.4.2 should
create a bug and add there a patch to LaTeXConfig.lyx
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
|
| What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
| target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is
Herbert Voss schrieb:
I wrote _LyX_ should copy and not the user
LyX can't copy it when it isn't on the system. The user didn't install
it because he didn't know that it exists. So if for example beamer isn't
installed Lyx can't copy a layout file and the LyX user might never use
beame
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Herbert Voss schrieb:
What I want to say is, that _LyX itself_ should not
contain these files. They should be installed from the the local
distribution, then you'll be sure, that you have always the right
one.
But the average user don't want to copy layout files or registe
Herbert Voss schrieb:
What I want to say is, that _LyX itself_ should not
contain these files. They should be installed from the the local
distribution, then you'll be sure, that you have always the right
one.
But the average user don't want to copy layout files or register them
anywhere. H
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Herbert Voss schrieb:
Also older beamer class files beginning with beamer 2.0 from
2004-02-18 works with the beamer.layout.
but 2.x is incompatible to 3.0 and later
Not the layout file. I've presentations created with beamer 2.x and 3.x
using the same beamer.layout witho
Herbert Voss schrieb:
Also older beamer class files beginning with beamer 2.0 from
2004-02-18 works with the beamer.layout.
but 2.x is incompatible to 3.0 and later
Not the layout file. I've presentations created with beamer 2.x and 3.x
using the same beamer.layout without problems.
Powe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
Also older beamer class files beginnin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
Also older beamer class files beginning with beamer 2.0 f
Herbert Voss wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible w
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
teTe
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
JMarc
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 14:09, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> I did not notice that. The last time I checked beamer was not included with
> tetex (it was probably tetex 2.x)
>
> My arguments for not including the layout files are for "extra" packages
> that are not contained in the big TeX distributions,
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2006 20:30, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Am Montag, 9. Januar 2006 11:54 schrieb Jose' Matos:
>> > OK, I will ask for it to be included with the lyx rpm for Fedora.
>>
>> That would create more work for the lyx rpm creators. IMHO it should be
>> included in the
On Monday 09 January 2006 20:30, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Januar 2006 11:54 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> > OK, I will ask for it to be included with the lyx rpm for Fedora.
>
> That would create more work for the lyx rpm creators. IMHO it should be
> included in the beamer rpm.
beamer comes
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2006 11:54 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> OK, I will ask for it to be included with the lyx rpm for Fedora.
That would create more work for the lyx rpm creators. IMHO it should be
included in the beamer rpm.
Georg
On Saturday 07 January 2006 12:53, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 10:20 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> > Jose' Matos wrote:
> > > is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer layout?
> >
> > I asked for this some time ago and Georg argumented that it is a special
> > package fo
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 10:20 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
> > is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer layout?
>
> I asked for this some time ago and Georg argumented that it is a special
> package for its own on some Linux systems that could cause problems.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It would be reasonable. I guess you should ask the beamer author what
he prefers.
Some time ago I asked him if we could ship it directly with LyX and he
allowed it (beamer is also under the GPL).
regards Uwe
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Hi, is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer
Jose'> layout?
It would be reasonable. I guess you should ask the beamer author what
he prefers.
JMarc
Jose' Matos wrote:
is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer layout?
I asked for this some time ago and Georg argumented that it is a special
package for its own on some Linux systems that could cause problems.
Georg is this still the case?
regards Uwe
p.s. I currentl
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> p.s. have a nice time in Clignancourt
Merci, mais malheureusement je ne serai pas présent. Les autres devront
boire de la bière pour moi. ;-)
--
Angus
24 matches
Mail list logo
