> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> I choose getStatus because it is nearly the same (and btw we
Georg> have already getStatus() functions with different signatures).
But both versions fill a FuncStatus object.
Georg> But canApply() is fine with me, so I'll use that no
Georg Baum wrote:
> PS: Angus, thanks for spotting one of my favourite spelling mistakes ;-)
It's easy to get right if you pronounce it correctly :)
http://evaeaston.com/pr/w-pr-weather.html
--
Angus
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
>>> Agreed. Also, I'd rather have a signature like virtual FuncStatus
>>> getStatus() const; since it is more in line with what LyXFunc does.
>
> Georg> Yes, but we need only the boolean value he
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Agreed. Also, I'd rather have a signature like virtual FuncStatus
>> getStatus() const; since it is more in line with what LyXFunc does.
Georg> Yes, but we need only the boolean value here. Things like
Georg> virtual bool getStatus() con
Georg Baum wrote:
>> Angus> However, I wonder if it would not be nicer to have:
>> [a getLFUN method]
>
> Yes.
>
>> Agreed. Also, I'd rather have a signature like
>> virtual FuncStatus getStatus() const;
>> since it is more in line with what LyXFunc does.
>
> Yes, but we need only the boolean va
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Angus> However, I wonder if it would not be nicer to have:
> [a getLFUN method]
Yes.
> Agreed. Also, I'd rather have a signature like
> virtual FuncStatus getStatus() const;
> since it is more in
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> However, I wonder if it would not be nicer to have:
[a getLFUN method]
Agreed. Also, I'd rather have a signature like
virtual FuncStatus getStatus() const;
since it is more in line with what LyXFunc does.
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
> The attached patch fixes Dialog::checkStatus(). The dialog dependant part
> is now in Dialog::Controller::getStatus() and reimplemented in all
> dialogs that need it.
>
> OK to apply?
fine with me.
Jürgen
Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 24. April 2005 13:12 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
>> Georg, we are talking about the "Text Style" dialog (a.k.a "character
>> dialog"), not the char style inset. Does the patch really not enable the
>> settings in that dialog for you?
>
> Sorry, that was a misunde
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2005 13:12 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> Georg, we are talking about the "Text Style" dialog (a.k.a "character
> dialog"), not the char style inset. Does the patch really not enable the
> settings in that dialog for you?
Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. The patch enabl
Georg Baum wrote:
> It does not work for me. I guess you removed the wrong lfun :-( I disabled
> LFUN_INSET_INSERT some days ago on purpose as part of the "fix applying
> open dialogs in wrong insets" patch. It is not possible to insert an
> inset when multiple cells are selected unless there is sp
Am Samstag, 23. April 2005 15:21 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
> > * One may select several table cells and apply bold or emphasize over
all.
> > One may not use the charstyle dialog (qt) though - everything
> > is grayed out when the selection span cell borders.
>
> pa
Helge Hafting wrote:
> * One may select several table cells and apply bold or emphasize over all.
> One may not use the charstyle dialog (qt) though - everything
> is grayed out when the selection span cell borders.
patch attached. I will commit if nobody objects.
Jürgen
Index: insettabular.C
Helge Hafting wrote:
> How about having the change take effect immediately, i.e. no
> option for regretting? Or is that just as hard as adding
> an apply button?
>
> Actually, having to "apply" changes for every cell or columns
> is cumbersome. The "lines" part of that dialog does not
> need "app
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 08:24:42AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
> > * Right-click a table. Set the column with to something like 3cm.
> > Then change from "centered" to "left" and notice that the
> > column width is lost!
>
> cannot reproduce
>
> > * Leave the tab
Helge Hafting wrote:
> * Right-click a table. Set the column with to something like 3cm.
> Then change from "centered" to "left" and notice that the
> column width is lost!
cannot reproduce
> * Leave the table dialog open, move the cursor from cell to cell
> and make changes all over the pl
16 matches
Mail list logo
