On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:03:40PM +0200, mn wrote:
> The UserGuide on macOS produces in its default state just blank output.
Feel lucky that you can compile user guide at all :)
It fails here for couple reasons:
- package babel error 'french' (already reported)
- latex error: file footnotehyper.s
Am Sonntag, 28. April 2013 um 18:22:37, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 27.04.2013 21:56, schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Am Samstag, 27. April 2013 um 21:41:12, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> >> I just noticed that during the last 7 days a serious bug was introduced:
> >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8644
>
> This see
Am 27.04.2013 21:56, schrieb Kornel Benko:
Am Samstag, 27. April 2013 um 21:41:12, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
I just noticed that during the last 7 days a serious bug was introduced:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8644
This seems to be fixed by Richard's yesterday's changes.
I get crash there if scr
Am Samstag, 27. April 2013 um 21:41:12, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> I just noticed that during the last 7 days a serious bug was introduced:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8644
>
> There is something wrong now with our math handling or the assertions.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> regards Uwe
I get crash there
Jean-Pierre Chrétien schrieb:
OK so it is a bug in TeXLive 2007. TeXLive 2008 and MiKTeX 2.7 and 2.8
don't show the problem. Therefore I opt not to hardcode a solution for
a bug of a special LaTeX distribution that is already fixed.
OK, but this LaTeX bug affects 37.5% of the installations,
Guenter Milde wrote:
> A ticket for "enable custom insertions before the required packages", yes.
which we already have:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5031
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5366
>Independent of this, there are cases where you want to pass an option
>to an autoloaded package but can
On 2009-09-07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg154250.html
> Thanks.
>> Should I file a ticket ?
A ticket for "enable custom insertions before the required packages", yes.
> How hard will it be for affected people
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
>
> How hard will it be for affected people to upgrade the respective packages?
Not hard, but needs patience.
Here is the procedure on Linux to install TeXLive 2008:
1) Download the netinstaller (e.g. in /tmp)
cd /tmp
wget
http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CTAN/systems/t
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg154250.html
Thanks.
> Should I file a ticket ?
I'm not sure. I do not much like the idea of adding a new package dependency
to fix a bug which is solved since almost two years, especially since nameref
does so
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> > OK, but this LaTeX bug affects 37.5% of the installations, from the
> > statistics on the Users' list...
>
> It's a quite bold idea to call the response of 8 people "statistics" and to
> deduce such a general percentage from that
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> OK, but this LaTeX bug affects 37.5% of the installations, from the
> statistics on the Users' list...
It's a quite bold idea to call the response of 8 people "statistics" and to
deduce such a general percentage from that ;-)
BTW could you post again a pointer to y
Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> Result in lyx-users: 5 success, 3 failures, clearly related to the
TeXLive version (failure is
> with TeXLive 2007).
>
> I myself upgraded TeXLive to 2008 with success (without and with my
patch).
OK so it is a bug in TeXLive 2007. TeXLive 2008 and MiKTeX 2.7 and 2.8
> Result in lyx-users: 5 success, 3 failures, clearly related to the TeXLive
version (failure is
> with TeXLive 2007).
>
> I myself upgraded TeXLive to 2008 with success (without and with my patch).
OK so it is a bug in TeXLive 2007. TeXLive 2008 and MiKTeX 2.7 and 2.8 don't show the problem.
T
Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
[...]
OK to assure that this hardcoding doesn't introduce new problems, can
you please prepare a small LyX example file that fails for you and ask
on the french-users and lyx-users mailing list who is able to compile
the file with LyX 1.6.4 and who not. We need to know what
Jean-Pierre Chrétien schrieb:
Can you please try to add this to the document preamble:
\AtBeginDocument{\usepackage{nameref}}
I did already try... no way, nameref should be added before varioref
(otherwise I wouldn't have changed the LyX code itself).
In fact, nameref *is* loaded without my p
Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Jean-Pierre Chrétien schrieb:
[...]
Can you please try to add this to the document preamble:
\AtBeginDocument{\usepackage{nameref}}
I did already try... no way, nameref should be added before varioref
(otherwise I wouldn't have changed the LyX code itself).
In fact, name
Jean-Pierre Chrétien schrieb:
That seems sound, yes. An other way would be to hack the French manuals
directly. Is there a way to load nameref before other packages ?
Can you please try to add this to the document preamble:
\AtBeginDocument{\usepackage{nameref}}
What have you used until now
Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Jean-Pierre Chrétien schrieb:
[...]
The problem you have is a problem with LaTeX packages not with LyX. We
try to avoid to introduce hard coded hacks into LyX to fix bugs in LaTeX
packages. Only when such a problem is not fixable or when the package
manuals explicitly rec
Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> With my Debian Lenny, doc/fr/Userguide.lyx and
doc/fr/EmbeddedObjects.lyx
> compilations fail because character ":" is active in French. This is
nowadays OK
> with most packages, but not with varioref, which version here is the
last one
> according to CTAN:
> [2006/0
Jean-Pierre Chrétien schrieb:
This loop (add \endcsname then complain about it) are due to ":" being
active in French, and seem to come from a nasty interaction between
varioref and hyperref.
It may also come from babel, a bit outdated here, but if I try to update
babel alone, I get a lot mo
> With my Debian Lenny, doc/fr/Userguide.lyx and doc/fr/EmbeddedObjects.lyx
> compilations fail because character ":" is active in French. This is nowadays
OK
> with most packages, but not with varioref, which version here is the last one
> according to CTAN:
> [2006/05/13 v1.4p package for exten
> Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
I always compile the documents before I commit changes.
There was only a problem last week that n image path was incorrect due to my image file renaming of
url -> href. I fixed this yesterday, so the UserGuide compiles now fine agai
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:53:28PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:28:35PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Moreover, \index is fragile,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:28:35PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Moreover, \index is fragile, so any fragile command appearing in its
> > > argument must be protected.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:00:58AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
On my machine LaTeX simply does not fin
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:00:58AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> >> Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
> >>
> >> On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Moreover, \index is fragile, so any fragile command appearing in its
> > argument must be protected. That is to say that
> >
> > \index{Bibliography ! Bib\TeX}
> >
> > doesn'
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:44:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
> >
> > On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
> > like
> >
> >
Martin Vermeer wrote:
BTW Paragraph.cpp is a _mess_. Hope Abdel manages to do something
there.
Still a lot to do but I've removed a few hundred locs... The new
FontList class could be a base for the range improvements we were
talking about during the charstyle fight.
There is even a place
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Moreover, \index is fragile, so any fragile command appearing in its
> argument must be protected. That is to say that
>
> \index{Bibliography ! Bib\TeX}
>
> doesn't work, but
>
> \index{Bibliography ! Bib\protect\TeX}
>
> does work.
This is easy to
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:14:40AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:53:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:09:22AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:44:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> > > > Command
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:18:49 +0200
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > For index, I was just thinking of switching off the standard phrases. %
> > would still be escaped.
>
> But then you need lyx2lyx support to translate the old manual escaping.
Probably yes.
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:14:50 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For index, I was just thinking of switching off the standard phrases. %
> > would
> > still be escaped.
>
> We should really get rid of these standard phrases a
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> For index, I was just thinking of switching off the standard phrases. %
> would still be escaped.
But then you need lyx2lyx support to translate the old manual escaping.
> BTW what _is_ the rule for stuff entered into an index? Or into an URL?
No idea besides RTFM ;-)
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For index, I was just thinking of switching off the standard phrases. % would
> still be escaped.
We should really get rid of these standard phrases and turn them to
insets (maybe even in insetspecialchar). The only difficulty is the on
screen drawing
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:57:07 +0200
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > I don't think we should do this in lyx2lyx after all. Currently the
> > unsuspecting user can manually enter LyX into an index inset and get
> > mysterious latexing errors. Not good.
>
> Yes.
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
like
! Use of [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't match its definition.
[EMAIL PRO
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I don't think we should do this in lyx2lyx after all. Currently the
> unsuspecting user can manually enter LyX into an index inset and get
> mysterious latexing errors. Not good.
Yes.
> I suppose we need runparams flags for verbatim output and for
> suppression of these s
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think we should do this in lyx2lyx after all. Currently the
> unsuspecting user can manually enter LyX into an index inset and get
> mysterious latexing errors. Not good.
>
> I suppose we need runparams flags for verbatim output and for
> suppre
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:53:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Hmmm... that's more complicated. I had the impression that a macro
could be used in the @ part of an entry, but
\index{Bibliography ! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
works, whereas
\index{Bibliography ! [EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:52:07 +0200
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > Is this something that should have beem done in lyx2lyx?
>
> That depends. If you prevent the automatic translation of LyX ->\LyX etc. in
> url charstles you don't need lyx2lyx _for this partic
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Is this something that should have beem done in lyx2lyx?
That depends. If you prevent the automatic translation of LyX ->\LyX etc. in
url charstles you don't need lyx2lyx _for this particular case_, but if the
current implementation stays then you need lyx2lyx.
But, lyx2l
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:53:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:09:22AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:44:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > > Commands such as \url and \index don't like latex macros in their
> > > argument
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:09:22AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:44:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > Commands such as \url and \index don't like latex macros in their
> > argument
>
> Sorry, that is true for \url only.
Hmmm... that's more complicated. I h
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:44:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Commands such as \url and \index don't like latex macros in their
> argument
Sorry, that is true for \url only.
--
Enrico
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:44:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
> >
> > On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
> > like
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:44:49AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
> >
> > On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
> > like
> >
> >
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
>
> On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
> like
>
>
> ! Use of [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't match its definition.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] #1->
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
like
same on windows.
it does not work for me quite long time (i remember another err messages
though).
e.g. http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-
> Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
>
> On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
> like
it does not work for me quite long time (i remember another err messages
though).
e.g. http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg129100.html
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Has anybody recently actually tried to compile the UserGuide?
On my machine LaTeX simply does not finish. Run by hand I get stuff
like
! Use of [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't match its definition.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #1->\def [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Here is a patch that implements proper functionning of M-Return (at
> least as I see it: like Return, but inverting role of environment and
> non-environment). I'd be interested to have some feedback on it. This
> is potentially for trunk and branch.
Could you describ
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>> M-Return is supposed to be do for commands what Return would do for
>> Environments and do for environments what Return would do for
>> commands.
>>
>> However, I see now that it does not do anything interesting for
>> enumerations. I'll have to double check that.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
In case somebody is interested in it I attach a profile
for the UserGuide scroll test including Qt.
We spend almost a quarter of the time in
[18]23.60.210.47 3036718 QFontMetrics::width(QChar) const
[18]
Interesting. Maybe you ought to try to enable
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Latest LyX cvs versions use \thanks for footnotes in titling
>> environments. Tex2lyx does not seem to have any support for that...
Georg> This explains it all: I produced the .tex file with LyX 1.3.
Geo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Latest LyX cvs versions use \thanks for footnotes in titling
> environments. Tex2lyx does not seem to have any support for that...
This explains it all: I produced the .tex file with LyX 1.3. I'll have a
look, \thanks is probably easy to support.
Georg
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Mittwoch, 16. Februar 2005 14:36 schrieb Georg Baum:
>> > The InsetFoot on the Author line is converted to ERT.
>>
>> Will have a look.
Georg> I can't reproduce this. I used the Userguide of 1.4cvs. Which
Georg> one did you use?
Am Mittwoch, 16. Februar 2005 14:36 schrieb Georg Baum:
> > The InsetFoot on the Author line is converted to ERT.
>
> Will have a look.
I can't reproduce this. I used the Userguide of 1.4cvs. Which one did you
use?
> > \begin_inset Text
> >
> > Perhaps these are just default values that aren
Angus Leeming wrote:
> There are some clear differences between the two files, although
> I don't know how important these are.
Some of the differences are empty font changes and not important at all.
There are also one character font changes. These are due to a bug of LyX:
http://bugzilla.lyx.or
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garst> InsertERT::Read: Missing 'status'-tagl (repeated many times)
These are normal (an oldish 1.2.0cvs format)
Garst> choice TOC|figure|table choice TOC|figure|table
I never saw these...
Garst> Paragraph 1232 found
A debug messag
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, John Levon wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | In the UserGuide :
> > |
> > | The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
> > | feature has not yet been properly te
On 29 Nov 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | In the UserGuide :
> |
> | The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
> | feature has not yet been properly tested out.
> |
> | Is this still true?
> |
> | In lyxfu
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Next question. Just beneath this last statement in the UserGuide we have:
|
| Notice that if you revert back all changes to arrive to the document as it
| was last saved, the "changed" status of the document is unfortunately not
| reset. This is a kn
Lars,
Just read your mail saying that a limit does exist. Fair enough. I'll modify
the UserGuide to say that this is so (ie, not a feature of the beta version,
now superceeded.)
Next question. Just beneath this last statement in the UserGuide we have:
Notice that if you revert back al
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In the UserGuide :
|
| The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
| feature has not yet been properly tested out.
|
| Is this still true?
|
| In lyxfunc.C::Dispatch()
| case LFUN_UNDO:
| disable
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In the UserGuide :
|
| The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
| feature has not yet been properly tested out.
|
| Is this still true?
Probably not.
|
| In lyxfunc.C::Dispatch()
| case LFUN_UNDO:
|
On 15 Mar 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Amir Karger writes:
> AK> Wow, I never realized how tremendously powerful I am! When do I
> AK> start getting royalties on LyX's profits?
>
> Note that the only profit LyX has is fame to its developers.
>
> (And the chance to participate at
>> Asger K Alstrup Nielsen writes:
AKAN> I prefer "slå lam". That's a word that means to beat someone
AKAN> until they can't move.
>> Really? I'd think that would be "slå lam"
AKAN> Didn't I write that?
even if you wrote that it sounds akward(?), "lamslå" sounds a lot
better (though
> AKAN> I prefer "slå lam". That's a word that means to beat someone
> AKAN> until they can't move.
>
> Really? I'd think that would be "slå lam"
Didn't I write that?
Slålam,
Asger ;-)
>> Asger K Alstrup Nielsen writes:
>> In norwegian it is spelled "slalåm"
AKAN> I prefer "slålam". That's a word that means to beat someone
AKAN> until they can't move.
Really? I'd think that would be "slå lam"
Lgb
asger aspirated,
> > In norwegian it is spelled "slalåm"
> I prefer "slålam". That's a word that means to beat someone
> until they can't move.
and has an uncanny resemlence to, "sue 'em," which done properly, has
the same effect :)
--
> In norwegian it is spelled "slalåm"
I prefer "slålam". That's a word that means to beat someone
until they can't move.
Greets,
Asger
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>>
> SLLOM? SLALOM? can we make that SHALOM?
>
Second Hand Anonymous Lyx Omni's Meeting
> Perhaps we should also discuss the topics of the meeting? (half a year
> in advance, but...)
>
> AK> in the alps somewhere. Or, just to confuse people, call it the
> AK> Fo
>> Amir Karger writes:
AK> Slalom. As in a skiing event.
As slalom is a norwegian work, I know what it is.
In norwegian it is spelled "slalåm"
it means "turns"
AK> Oktoberfest?
possibly
Lgb
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 06:19:13PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Amir Karger writes:
>
> AK> know---how's the Rogues' Gallery doing, David?). I kind of like
> AK> Second Lyx And Latex Omnisicients' Meeting, which could be held
>
> SLLOM? SLALOM? can we make that SHALOM?
Slalom. A
>> Amir Karger writes:
AK> On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 05:52:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
AK> wrote:
>> >> Amir Karger writes:
AK> Wow, I never realized how tremendously powerful I am! When do I
AK> start getting royalties on LyX's profits?
>> Note that the only profit LyX has is fa
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 05:52:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Amir Karger writes:
> AK> Wow, I never realized how tremendously powerful I am! When do I
> AK> start getting royalties on LyX's profits?
>
> Note that the only profit LyX has is fame to its developers.
Hm, no job of
>> Amir Karger writes:
AK> Wow, I never realized how tremendously powerful I am! When do I
AK> start getting royalties on LyX's profits?
Note that the only profit LyX has is fame to its developers.
(And the chance to participate at SILM, you missed FILM obviously)
Lgb
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 07:17:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Amir Karger writes:
>
> AK> --JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> AK> OK. This patch adds the nth root command, as well as a short
> AK> section on math text mode. Both are really short.
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AK> OK. This patch adds the nth root command, as well as a short
AK> section on math text mode. Both are really short. For the math
AK> text mode thing, I basically just used what you wrote at me,
AK> JMarc. Take a look at it and fix
>> Amir Karger writes:
AK> --JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
AK> OK. This patch adds the nth root command, as well as a short
AK> section on math text mode. Both are really short. For the math
AK> text mode thing, I basically just used what you wrote at me,
> "Arkady" == Arkady Kitover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arkady> Dear lyx developers, I cannot open in lyx the User guide and
Arkady> Customization documents. The message is "Bad value, integer
Arkady> parameter not in range for operation. Thank you for your
Arkady> help.
Hello,
This mess
82 matches
Mail list logo
