Joost Verburg wrote:
Joost Verburg wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
FYI, I implemented just that before 1.5.0 and part of the code is
still there commented out. Unfortunately, it was rejected then for
the very same reason as now. I too think this option would be useful.
One use case I can thin
Joost Verburg wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
FYI, I implemented just that before 1.5.0 and part of the code is
still there commented out. Unfortunately, it was rejected then for the
very same reason as now. I too think this option would be useful. One
use case I can think of besides the other
Joost Verburg wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
FYI, I implemented just that before 1.5.0 and part of the code is
still there commented out. Unfortunately, it was rejected then for the
very same reason as now. I too think this option would be useful. One
use case I can think of besides the other
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
FYI, I implemented just that before 1.5.0 and part of the code is still
there commented out. Unfortunately, it was rejected then for the very
same reason as now. I too think this option would be useful. One use
case I can think of besides the other you already cited:
Joost Verburg wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to add an option to the preferences to set the user
interface language? The default would of course be to rely on the
environment variable, but it will allow the user to change the language
much more easily.
FYI, I implemented just that before 1
Andre Poenitz wrote:
It isn't common to change the language of the user interface easily,
either.
It may not be common, but why not make it easy?
Of course this is clumsy, writing a two-line batch script setting the
environment and starting LyX is far easier (one could even have desktop
short
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:21:53AM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to add an option to the preferences to set the
> user interface language? The default would of course be to rely on the
> environment variable, but it will allow the user to change the
> language much more
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I meant applications that support several languages after
>> installation.
Yes, I understand that (although the installer could decide not to
install all po files (how big is the total?))
> Right. But LyX includes all the languages anyway, so why not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
To be fair, it is not common either to have programs where one can
change language at run time.
I don't mean that the language should change immediately. If a restart
is required that's no problem.
I meant applications that support several languages after
installati
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> To be fair, it is not common either to have programs where one can
>> change language at run time.
>
> I don't mean that the language should change immediately. If a restart
> is required that's no problem.
I meant applica
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
To be fair, it is not common either to have programs where one can
change language at run time.
I don't mean that the language should change immediately. If a restart
is required that's no problem.
Joost
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Windows it is not common at all to set environment variables for
> such a thing.
To be fair, it is not common either to have programs where one can
change language at run time.
JMarc
Pavel Sanda wrote:
But also on Linux I think most people would prefer to have to ability to
change the language per application instead of changing a system-wide
environment variable.
in linux you have this per-application ability, simply by eg "LANG=cs_CZ lyx"
Yes, but it requires you to mo
> But also on Linux I think most people would prefer to have to ability to
> change the language per application instead of changing a system-wide
> environment variable.
in linux you have this per-application ability, simply by eg "LANG=cs_CZ lyx"
pavel
14 matches
Mail list logo
