Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-07 Thread cghan
On 7 Mar 2003, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjøînes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Well you were the one who dug deep in all this. > > And I do not remember in what cases specifically an explicit > connection tracking was needed. > > | I'm merely reporting what I > | remembe

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-07 Thread cghan
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > > "boost::signal2 workAreaCJK_IMprocess;" > > No, this is fine. Only static signals can be problematic. The problem lies > elsewhere then. > Then, I think I have nothing to do with the error. By the way, Angus, I posted a crash problem during the

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Well you were the one who dug deep in all this. And I do not remember in what cases specifically an explicit connection tracking was needed. | I'm merely reporting what I | remember. Anyway, the crash occurs in Toolbar::Pimpl::~Pimpl, called from | b

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-07 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 07 March 2003 11:03 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Friday 07 March 2003 5:04 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | > Hello, Angus: > | > > | > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote: > | > > Hmmm. This rings a bell. > | > > CG did I see that

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 07 March 2003 5:04 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | > Hello, Angus: | > | > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote: | > > Hmmm. This rings a bell. | > > CG did I see that you added a static boost::signal to the code? I | > > believe taht older g

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-07 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 07 March 2003 5:04 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, Angus: > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Hmmm. This rings a bell. > > CG did I see that you added a static boost::signal to the code? I > > believe taht older gcc compilers had problems with these static > > signals (

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread cghan
Hello, Angus: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote: > Hmmm. This rings a bell. > CG did I see that you added a static boost::signal to the code? I > believe taht older gcc compilers had problems with these static > signals (generated incorrect code) but can't remember the details > anymore. A

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread Angus Leeming
Mike FABIAN wrote: > > #5  0x402b9d25 in __cxa_pure_virtual () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 > #6  0x082cc2d7 in ~Pimpl (this=0x85b6200) at Toolbar_pimpl.C:99 > #7  0x08249b65 in ~Toolbar (this=0x85b5fe0) at Toolbar.C:41 Hmmm. This rings a bell. CG did I see that you added a static boost::signal

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-06 Thread Mike FABIAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: (B (B> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: (B>> (B>> There is one strange problem left. Always when I exit CJK-LyX, there (B>> is an error message "pure virtual method called" on standard output (B>> and it dumps core: (B>> (B>> [...] (B>>

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Mike FABIAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: (B (B> 'Root' input style does not have 'preedit position' and 'preedit area'. (B> Without preedit position and area set, there is not much chance of (B> input server's putting precomposed characters on the viewing area. This is (B> the reason why

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Mike FABIAN wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] さんは書きました: > >>> But I see only mojibake in the menus. Is there anything I need >>> to setup especially? >> >> What does this, 'mojibake', mean? If you rpm-install, you don't have to >> do anything else. If you install other way, you have to make sure >> 'ja.

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread cghan
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: > > I found a workaround for the "mojibake in the menus" problem: > > LANG=ja_JP LC_CTYPE=ja_JP LC_MESSAGES=ja_JP lyx-cjk > example-japanese-cjk-latex.lyx > > show mojibake in the menus *but* > > LC_ALL=ja_JP lyx-cjk example-japanese-cjk-latex.ly

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread cghan
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: > > > Looks strange to me, too. All I can think of for the reason, is that > > xforms-lib is not properly installed? > > Although I don't think that I made a mistake in installing > the i18n patched xforms, I am tempted to try a Qt build instead. > O.K

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Mike FABIAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: (B (B>> But I see only mojibake in the menus. Is there anything I need (B>> to setup especially? (B> (B> What does this, 'mojibake', mean? If you rpm-install, you don't have to do (B> anything else. If you install other way, you have to make sure 'ja

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Mike FABIAN wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] さんは書きました: > >> Looks strange to me, too. All I can think of for the reason, is that >> xforms-lib is not properly installed? > > Although I don't think that I made a mistake in installing > the i18n patched xforms, I am tempted to try a Qt build instead. >

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Mike FABIAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: (B (B> Looks strange to me, too. All I can think of for the reason, is that (B> xforms-lib is not properly installed? (B (BAlthough I don't think that I made a mistake in installing (Bthe i18n patched xforms, I am tempted to try a Qt build instead.

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Mike FABIAN
Mike FABIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: (B (B> I found that the bold fonts work when I try in Japanese. (B> Then the bold face Japanese looks correct like in the old (B> CJK-LyX 1.2.0 screen shot on (B> (B> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian/suse-cjk/cjk-lyx-japanese.html (B (B

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Mike FABIAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: (B (B> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: (B>> (B>> Currently it looks like this on my system: (B>> (B>> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian/misc/cghan-20030305/cjk-lyx-1.3.0-korean.png (B> (B> Looks strange to me, too. All I can think of for the

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread Mike FABIAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B: (B (B> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: (B (B>> But I see only mojibake in the menus. Is there anything I need (B>> to setup especially? (B> (B> What does this, 'mojibake', mean? (B (B"Mojibake" means "garbled characters". I think you already

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-05 Thread cghan
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Mike FABIAN wrote: > > Currently it looks like this on my system: > > http://www.suse.de/~mfabian/misc/cghan-20030305/cjk-lyx-1.3.0-korean.png > Looks strange to me, too. All I can think of for the reason, is that xforms-lib is not properly installed? > With CJK-Ly

Re: Upgrade to New CJK-LyX-1.3.0

2003-03-04 Thread Angus Leeming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello, > > I found a critical bug in CJK-LyX-1.3.0 (up to the version '3') regarding > to 'tex command inset'. So I urge all CJK-LyX users to upgrade to the > latest 'CJK-LyX-1.3.0-4' which can be downloaded at the ftp site, > > ftp://stone.phys.pusan.ac.kr/pub/CJK-