Hello, Angus: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Hmmm. This rings a bell. > CG did I see that you added a static boost::signal to the code? I > believe taht older gcc compilers had problems with these static > signals (generated incorrect code) but can't remember the details > anymore. Anyway, if you did add a static boost::signal in your patch, > then we devised a work-around. Could you let me know as I don't have > your source to hand. Yes, I did. It is in src/frontends/WorkArea.h, "boost::signal2<void, int,char const *> workAreaCJK_IMprocess;" I have used this code since lyx-1.2.0, and have had no problem, but why now? Regards, cghan