Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 07 March 2003 5:04 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > Hello, Angus:
| >
| > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
| > > Hmmm. This rings a bell.
| > > CG did I see that you added a static boost::signal to the code? I
| > > believe taht older gcc compilers had problems with these static
| > > signals (generated incorrect code) but can't remember the details
| > > anymore. Anyway, if you did add a static boost::signal in your patch,
| > > then we devised a work-around. Could you let me know as I don't have
| > > your source to hand.
| >
| > Yes, I did. It is in src/frontends/WorkArea.h,
| >
| > "boost::signal2<void, int,char const *> workAreaCJK_IMprocess;"
|
| No, this is fine. Only static signals can be problematic. The problem lies
| elsewhere then.
Are you sure that only static signals can be prolematic?
--
Lgb
