On Monday 01 May 2006 13:09, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:35:32PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > PS: FWIW, Susana completed with success her PhD. :-)
>
> So you've finally got one in the family. Or did I miss anything?
I hope to do the same next September/October. :-)
So
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:35:32PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> PS: FWIW, Susana completed with success her PhD. :-)
So you've finally got one in the family. Or did I miss anything?
Andre'
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:42:28PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 28. April 2006 17:35 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > > - send patches against 1.4 (step by step, one fix = one patch)
> >
> > I was asked to send patches for tr
Am Samstag, 29. April 2006 15:27 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Right. But you are not frustrated by someone who says that you are
> also wasting his time, instead you get gratitude and, in turn, this
> is rewarding for you.
Who said you were waisting his time? I never did that. I said that I have
Am Freitag, 28. April 2006 17:35 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > - send patches against 1.4 (step by step, one fix = one patch)
>
> I was asked to send patches for trunk. Please, make your mind.
That is true. First comes trunk, then 1.4
Am Freitag, 28. April 2006 17:12 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> I used to lurve fights on Fridays. Please be ruder!
And then you write 'please'? That won't work :-) (no friday anymore). BTW
what is lurve? I only know lure.
Georg
Am Freitag, 28. April 2006 17:07 schrieb Bo Peng:
> I am still wondering why people do not like my local-layout-cls
> patch(es). Forcing users to put .layout and .cls in their respective
> places, using that lengthy and troublesome procedure, is *not* nice.
> Even latex allows local .cls file!
II
On Saturday 29 April 2006 16:25, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> You mean nobody explained you? I understand your reaction then. I've
> read a bit the archive and here is my interpretation: In the old old
> days when men were men and lyx was a pioneer project, there were huge
> flame wars among develo
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:25:44PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:36:31PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> It was friday Enrico, Friday!
> >
> > Please, explain this Friday thing. In my culture Friday is like
> > Saturday, or
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:36:31PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
It was friday Enrico, Friday!
Please, explain this Friday thing. In my culture Friday is like
Saturday, or Monday, or... (sorry for being so stupid).
You mean nobody explained you? I understand yo
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:36:31PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> It was friday Enrico, Friday!
Please, explain this Friday thing. In my culture Friday is like
Saturday, or Monday, or... (sorry for being so stupid).
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:21:13PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Michael Gerz a écrit :
Gentlemen,
I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 dis
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:21:13PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> Michael Gerz a écrit :
> >>> Gentlemen,
> >>>
> >>> I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 discu
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 10:42:34AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> It's a benefit/cost ratio, Jean-Marc. I gain nothing in having
> Enrico> my patches applied. I can simply patch my version and have a
> Enrico> very
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Michael Gerz a écrit :
Gentlemen,
I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 discussion.
I've hoped that it would be more heated... like it should be for a
decent friday flame w
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Michael Gerz a écrit :
> > Gentlemen,
> >
> > I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 discussion.
>
> I've hoped that it would be more heated... like it should be for a
> decent friday flame war but I di
Michael Gerz a écrit :
Gentlemen,
I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 discussion.
I've hoped that it would be more heated... like it should be for a
decent friday flame war but I did not succeed. Except for Enrico and
Georg who managed to write one or two bad words
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> It's a benefit/cost ratio, Jean-Marc. I gain nothing in having
Enrico> my patches applied. I can simply patch my version and have a
Enrico> very high value for that ratio. This may seem selfish
Enrico> behaviour but gives me m
Gentlemen,
I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 discussion.
I understand that everybody wants to have his favourite feature
available as soon as possible. However, we are obliged to provide the
LyX users with a series of stable versions at the same time. If someone
w
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I used to lurve fights on Fridays. Please be ruder!
> I am trying to revive the tradition but nobody follows... Do you think I
> should be even ruder?
Yeah. Tell 'em like it is!
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:12:57PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
> >> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
> >> annoyed that seemingly everything which is
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:38:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >>Please ask for that damn svn access!
> >
> >Abdel,
> >
> >I am not a programmer but a "power user" (using Windows parliance)
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:54:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> Here is the problem. Nobody cares about cygwin, ergo it is not
> Enrico> well accepted. I mean, you have to do something for nothing, I
> Enrico> woul
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Please ask for that damn svn access!
Abdel,
I am not a programmer but a "power user" (using Windows parliance),
and my contribution to LyX would be poor.
bla bla bla...
The native Windows port
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Please ask for that damn svn access!
Abdel,
I am not a programmer but a "power user" (using Windows parliance),
and my contribution to LyX would be poor.
The native Windows port had screwed up the cygwin target and nobody
care
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not
well accepted.
Bullshit. In
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I agree that getting some of the changes in was painful, but I
>> think the quality of the patches improved.
Bo> I agree with both, taking the recent example of
Bo> Document->compressed. If I can get feedbacks at the current speed,
Bo> I have n
I agree that getting some of the changes in was painful, but I think
the quality of the patches improved.
I agree with both, taking the recent example of Document->compressed.
If I can get feedbacks at the current speed, I have no complain. That
does not have to mean I will invest time on backpo
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> Here is the problem. Nobody cares about cygwin, ergo it is not
Enrico> well accepted. I mean, you have to do something for nothing, I
Enrico> would not well accept it, too.
It is not that we do not _care_. It is just that, si
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
- explain why it is needed
- explain how well it is tested
- explain potential risks (or the lack thereof)
- ask for inclusion
I think I always did so.
- commit it (yourself) if OK
Cannot do it.
Enric
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
> > all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
> > annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is
Bo Peng a écrit :
I am sure that you will get more positive feedback if you follow this
procedure.
I really was interested in pushing some of my patches in, because I
think they are important, if not essential, and other people can
benefit from them. However, I feel less and less motivated in d
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
>> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
>> annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not
>> well accepted.
> Bullshit. In my case I don't
I am sure that you will get more positive feedback if you follow this
procedure.
I really was interested in pushing some of my patches in, because I
think they are important, if not essential, and other people can
benefit from them. However, I feel less and less motivated in doing
so. I am using
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Also, (now that I tried it in 1.5) wouldn't it be more readable by
>> trying to put the arrows on the left and bottom border of the
>> inset?
Georg> I did not increase the area covered by the phantom ins
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Also, (now that I tried it in 1.5) wouldn't it be more readable by
> trying to put the arrows on the left and bottom border of the inset?
I did not increase the area covered by the phantom inset in comparison to
the contents on purpose, otherwise you would not get co
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
> annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not
> well accepted.
Bullshit. In my case I don't have the energy no
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:53:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> r13704 - EF - Account for Cygwin teTeX on Windows
>
> I'd say no.
So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
annoyed that seemin
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> That one is really easy indeed (only two new files and a couple
Georg> of changed lines), and the most important thing is that it is
Georg> self contained (if there should be a bug only phantom stuff
Georg> will be affected). I'll prep
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Michael" == Michael Gerz
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> r13700 - GB - Make MathBigInset working
>
> I'd say no.
I agree, because it is a) not finished yet and b) involves changes at
central places that may have side effects.
> There is also a phant
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Hi Jean-Marc, here comes an updated list of potential 1.4.X
Michael> patches.
Michael> I guess that not all of them make sense for 1.4.X. Guys,
Michael> please let me know if some revision can be removed from the
Michael> list.
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Hi Jean-Marc,
>
> here comes an updated list of potential 1.4.X patches.
Yes, mine (JS) should go in in any case (IMHO).
Jürgen
42 matches
Mail list logo
