Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That would then be opened whenever the child was, and the various
settings imported (which, in the code, may mean no more than giving
the two documents the same BufferParams).
Infact, I was just thinking at smt
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
But this won't be a problem at all with Stefan's new code, which
should go into 1.6.svn soon.
How will that work ?
He's got a complete, and much more flexible, re-write of the macro code
on the way. I can't remember the details, but it is very, very cool.
Richard
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That would then be opened whenever the child was, and the various
>> settings imported (which, in the code, may mean no more than giving
>> the two documents the same BufferParams).
> Infact, I was just thinking at smth. like that. The main point I
Richard Heck ha scritto:
I've had the same idea. The mechanism would presumably be a "master
document" setting in Document>Settings, which would identify the
master document.
This would be similar to AucTeX, that writes (automatically) into the
child a (commented)
reference to the master, what
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
The first thing I'd like to point out is that it is quite annoying to
have to repeat
the same settings to each and every child document, just to allow the
preview
of them in isolation. I would love to see a mechanism for automatic
*inheritance*
of these properties from
Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
Bo Peng wrote:
No. The whole idea of separating chapters from a book is that I can
compile and view the chapters *quicker*. I do not want to compile the
whole book when I am working on a chapter.
Here, I actually agree with Bo. When you separate chapters/sections,
Bo Peng wrote:
On 9/14/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One question: Why don't we make this the default? I mean that the
present binding will always work with the master document. This means
that new binding should be cr
On 9/14/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One question: Why don't we make this the default? I mean that the
> > present binding will always work with the master document. This means
> > that new binding should be created for ch
Martin Vermeer ha scritto:
Does the window manager intercept it?
\bind "C-Tab""buffer-next"
I don't think so. LyX says "Disabled command" then I type it.
T.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One question: Why don't we make this the default? I mean that the
> present binding will always work with the master document. This means
> that new binding should be created for child documents. I personally
> would prefer this behaviour a lot becau
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We have Ctrl-PageUp/Down for that. C-Tab is often used by other things
>> (but we could add it nevertheless).
>
> It's used only for some exotic mathed navigation. I don't know if you
> remember but you promised me to change that in exchange of some
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
open buffers).
We have Ctrl-PageUp/Down for that. C-Tab is oft
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:35:57AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
open
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
open buffers).
We have Ctrl-PageUp/Down for that. C-Tab is oft
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
open buffers).
We have Ctrl-PageUp/Down for that. C-Tab is often used by other things
(but we could
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:35:57AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
almost standard on multi-document editors (cyc
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:35:57AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ha scritto:
> >Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
> >>almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
> >>open bu
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:31 +1000, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Suggestion: A dialogue could ask whether the user wants to update the
> existing preview, thus only one menu item is required for each file
> format to preview. They need only one set of keybindings, plus two more
> for "Update existing" an
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 00:57 +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Also, let me propose some rework of the View menu (independently
> from the master-buffer-view being accepted or not):
I'm in favour of this change compared to the present menu.
However I'd like to make a couple of suggestions for th
Index: src/LyXFunc.cpp
===
--- src/LyXFunc.cpp (revisione 20259)
+++ src/LyXFunc.cpp (copia locale)
@@ -999,6 +1001,16 @@
Exporter::preview(lyx_view_->buffer(), argument);
brea
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
open buffers).
We have Ctrl-PageUp/Down for that. C-Tab is often used by other things
(
Bo Peng ha scritto:
[...]
We already have many items
under the View menu, and a shortcut-only hidden feature is not that
appealing.
Also, let me propose some rework of the View menu (independently
from the master-buffer-view being accepted or not):
View
+- Zoom
| +- Increase 20% (C-+)
| +-
Tommaso Cucinotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
> almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
> open buffers).
We have Ctrl-PageUp/Down for that. C-Tab is often used by other things
(but we could add it nevertheless).
> S
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On a related note, what about implementing the C-Tab shortcut
almost standard on multi-document editors (cycle through
open buffers).
I think this already exists. Check the .bind file.
Richard
--
==
Richar
Bo Peng ha scritto:
It is useful, but it is not so difficult to switch to the master
buffer and generate preview from there. We already have many items
under the View menu, and a shortcut-only hidden feature is not that
appealing.
Just a note: when you're about to finish an article, often
you
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> All the range of export types should be supported, though.
>>
> And it is, as Tommaso has it.
I mean that we should have a C-M-d binding for postscript. And
probably a master-buffer-update lfun for completeness.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I find it useful. Maybe others too.
It is useful, but it is not so difficult to switch to the master
buffer and generate preview from there. We already have many items
under the View menu, and a shortcut-only hidden fe
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I find it useful. Maybe others too.
>
> It is useful, but it is not so difficult to switch to the master
> buffer and generate preview from there. We already have many items
> under the View menu, and a shortcut-only hidden feature is not that
> appealing.
> > I find it useful. Maybe others too.
>
> It is useful, but it is not so difficult to switch to the master
> buffer and generate preview from there. We already have many items
> under the View menu, and a shortcut-only hidden feature is not that
> appealing.
is it possible to achive this functi
> I find it useful. Maybe others too.
It is useful, but it is not so difficult to switch to the master
buffer and generate preview from there. We already have many items
under the View menu, and a shortcut-only hidden feature is not that
appealing.
Bo
30 matches
Mail list logo
