Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-07-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | I have committed the updated attached patch in the "younes" branch in | case someone would like to continue the clean up work. I have merged parts of this. I will continue the merging Wednesday evening. I am doing it piece by piece to

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Edwin Leuven wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Yes. Of course your decision is respected, but I hope you reconsider > > it again. > > everybody knows that retiring on friday doesn't count... True. Except for cyclists. Jürgen

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-07-01 Thread Edwin Leuven
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Yes. Of course your decision is respected, but I hope you reconsider it again. everybody knows that retiring on friday doesn't count...

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-07-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Georg Baum wrote: > That is sad to read. Although I did not always agree with your changes I > think we all owe you a big THANK YOU for everything you have done for > LyX. After all, it was a big amount of work, and the results are > impressive. I second that. The work you have done and also your

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-07-01 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 12:07 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > I strongly disagree. I have seen many patches in the list that were much > bigger than this one and didn't provoke the reaction my patches always > provoke from you. I noticed that too, and I can understand that that is frustrating. On

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Michael Gerz
Edwin Leuven wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello, I have committed the updated attached patch in the "younes" branch in case someone would like to continue the clean up work. i hope that this is not the last thing we see of you Congratulation, LyX! You lost another ambitious developer

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Edwin Leuven
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello, I have committed the updated attached patch in the "younes" branch in case someone would like to continue the clean up work. Cheers, Abdel. i hope that this is not the last thing we see of you

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Hello, I have committed the updated attached patch in the "younes" branch in case someone would like to continue the clean up work. Cheers, Abdel. Index: src/BufferView.C === --- src/BufferView.C(revision 14280) +++ src/Buffer

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Helge Hafting
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > We cannot continue to have this battle every time you create a new | > patch. | | Right, trusting me a tiny more bit would help. It is not about trust. It is about not doing too many changes at the same time. Actual

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > We cannot continue to have this battle every time you create a new | > patch. | | Right, trusting me a tiny more bit would help. It is not about trust. It is about not doing too many changes at the same time. Actually, I do trust you, your code

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | * frontends/Timeout: | > |- emit() renamed to emitSignal() to avoid compiler confusion with Qt | > | emit() function (change prop

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Georg Baum
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Because this change will have to be done on all qt code and the > resulting patch will be bigger than this one. IMO, those changes are > really minimal, nothing to fuss about. Well, you see that they create fuss, so why not solve the problem once and forever? Nobody wou

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Georg Baum wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: No, there is a boost macro compatibility flag that I plan to use in the future for that. This flag will need a change of the "emit", "signals" and "slot" macros to "Q_EMIT", "Q_SIGNALS" and "Q_SLOT" or something like that. In the mean time, please acce

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | * frontends/Timeout: | > |- emit() renamed to emitSignal() to avoid compiler confusion with Qt | > | emit() function (change propagated to all frontend). | >

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Georg Baum
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > No, there is a boost macro compatibility flag that I plan to use in the > future for that. This flag will need a change of the "emit", "signals" > and "slot" macros to "Q_EMIT", "Q_SIGNALS" and "Q_SLOT" or something > like that. In the mean time, please accept my timeout

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | * frontends/Timeout: |- emit() renamed to emitSignal() to avoid compiler confusion with Qt | emit() function (change propagated to all frontend). This I do not like. I agree on the principle but, come on, we d

Re: [Patch] WorkArea eradication from BufferView: THE DEATH SENTENCE

2006-06-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | * frontends/Timeout: |- emit() renamed to emitSignal() to avoid compiler confusion with Qt | emit() function (change propagated to all frontend). This I do not like. Qt deserves a lot of flak for pushing such common names into the global n