Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Because this change will have to be done on all qt code and the > resulting patch will be bigger than this one. IMO, those changes are > really minimal, nothing to fuss about.
Well, you see that they create fuss, so why not solve the problem once and forever? Nobody would look at such a mechanical patch. When you say "I am only going to replace emit by QEMIT all over in qt4" everybody would trust you that you would not do anything else. > Oups, right, tanks, I'll change that. Who is responsible for this > commented out code anyway? Alfredo according to svn blame. It would be good if you could figure out whether it can be deleted or reactivated. Georg
