Bo Peng wrote:
>> No, I want to have compressed files (.gz or .zip, I don't care) but
>> without being forced to embed all figures inside.
>
> Document -> Embedded Files -> Enable Embedding. Select all emdedded
> files -> select 'External'. You will get a zip file with file.lyx and
> manifest.txt
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 16:53:59 Bo Peng wrote:
> I see. Please allow me to more or less finish the embedding feature
> before we polish it. There are tones of undecided issues with this
> feature.
OK.
One advantage of placing everything in the main lyx file is that you can
have a compr
> That is either we go with the previous lyx way or we go full odf where each
> section is a file in the upper directory. And sooner or later we need to
> tackle the lyx2lyx subject.
I see. Please allow me to more or less finish the embedding feature
before we polish it. There are tones of undec
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 16:27:36 Bo Peng wrote:
> Because a) I do not want to mess with lyx2lyx now,
I knew that. :-)
> b) this does not really belong to the main document.
> This is why ODF also has this manifest file.
Then if want to do this you should rename the main file content.lyx
> I understand this. What I do not understand is why this is an external file
> and not a section of the main file header.
Because a) I do not want to mess with lyx2lyx now, b) this does not
really belong to the main document. This is why ODF also has this
manifest file.
Bo
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 16:06:56 Bo Peng wrote:
> All bundled files have this manifest.txt and this fact is used to
> judge if a file is in bundled format. In this particular case, all
> embedded files will be listed in this manifest.txt, with status
> 'EXTERNAL'. Then, next time when this fil
On 9/4/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 September 2007 15:29:20 Bo Peng wrote:
> > Document -> Embedded Files -> Enable Embedding. Select all emdedded
> > files -> select 'External'. You will get a zip file with file.lyx and
> > manifest.txt.
>
> Why do we need this manif
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 15:29:20 Bo Peng wrote:
> Document -> Embedded Files -> Enable Embedding. Select all emdedded
> files -> select 'External'. You will get a zip file with file.lyx and
> manifest.txt.
Why do we need this manifest.txt? It seems redundant to me.
> Bo
--
José Abílio
> No, I want to have compressed files (.gz or .zip, I don't care) but without
> being forced to embed all figures inside.
Document -> Embedded Files -> Enable Embedding. Select all emdedded
files -> select 'External'. You will get a zip file with file.lyx and
manifest.txt.
Bo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> So you agree that, if .zip embedding is implemented, compressed lyx
>>> file has no big enough advantage to justify its existence? Or you want
>>> to add bzip2-compressed lyx files and rot13 versions too?
>>
>> As
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So you agree that, if .zip embedding is implemented, compressed lyx
>> file has no big enough advantage to justify its existence? Or you want
>> to add bzip2-compressed lyx files and rot13 versions too?
>
> As long as we don't lose the ability to h
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Monday 03 September 2007 13:34:52 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Are you getting nervous about 126 bytes?
>
>> Surely not, but you asked for one advantage and I gave it. ;-)
>
> So you agree that, if .zip embedding is
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 03 September 2007 13:34:52 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Are you getting nervous about 126 bytes?
> Surely not, but you asked for one advantage and I gave it. ;-)
So you agree that, if .zip embedding is implemented, compressed lyx
file has no b
On Monday 03 September 2007 13:34:52 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Are you getting nervous about 126 bytes?
>
> JMarc
Surely not, but you asked for one advantage and I gave it. ;-)
--
José Abílio
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> At lot of people who do not understand the .lyx format, appreciate to
>> be able to change \alpha to \beta throughout the file.
>
> That is orthogonal to our discussion. If people do not use compress or
> embedded they will still be able to do that as t
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 01 September 2007 15:31:28 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> Cite one advantage of compressed vs zipped.
>
> Compression rate. You asked. ;-)
>
> Compare gzip -9 with zip. :-)
So:
pegase: gzip -c9 UserGuide.lyx >ug.lyx.gz
pegase: zip -9 ug
> I think that we can distribute a set of tools to work outline with zip
> and
btw one of the nice features of .odt is that you can use just unzip
to look into without anything special to download/learn.
pavel
On Saturday 01 September 2007 15:30:47 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Because this feature more or less duplicates with embedding, and if we
> >> decide to go with .lyz for lyx bundle format, .lyx will always be a
> >> plain text file.
> >
> > I think th
On Saturday 01 September 2007 15:31:28 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Cite one advantage of compressed vs zipped.
Compression rate. You asked. ;-)
Compare gzip -9 with zip. :-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Because this feature more or less duplicates with embedding, and if we
> >> decide to go with .lyz for lyx bundle format, .lyx will always be a
> >> plain text file.
> >
> > I th
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> LyX supports compressed files in a clean way, so let us leave that way.
> I don't want to appear rude but we should be very cautious about removing
> features, and in this case the feature is well written and robust. How many
> bug reports did we had ab
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Because this feature more or less duplicates with embedding, and if we
>> decide to go with .lyz for lyx bundle format, .lyx will always be a
>> plain text file.
>
> I think that the dos time is gone long ago and a lyx suffix should stand
> for
> lyx f
> I think that the dos time is gone long ago and a lyx suffix should stand for
> lyx files no matter what the internal format used.
This can be done easily later after you and JMarc (and others) reach
an agreement. I personally like a unique .lyx extension, even if
compression is removed.
> > Y
On Saturday 01 September 2007 03:14:11 Bo Peng wrote:
> Because this feature more or less duplicates with embedding, and if we
> decide to go with .lyz for lyx bundle format, .lyx will always be a
> plain text file.
I think that the dos time is gone long ago and a lyx suffix should stand for
ly
On 8/31/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2007 18:02:13 Bo Peng wrote:
> > 1. remove of the compression feature (Jose, JMarc?)
> Why?
> LyX supports compressed files in a clean way, so let us leave that way.
> I don't want to appear rude but we should be very caut
José Matos wrote:
e) embed layout file
f) modules
g) latex classes
There's a very general solution to this: Write the ENTIRE layout to a
single file and them embed that. This is not hard conceptually. It just
needs the work to be done. The only thing you really need is a
Tex
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:02:13 Bo Peng wrote:
> 1. remove of the compression feature (Jose, JMarc?)
> a) lyx2lyx convert: decompress file
> b) remove menu item and read/write of compressed file in Buffer.cpp.
> c) remove boost iostreams and gzstream
Why?
LyX supports compressed files
Dear all,
The core and basic gui of the embedding feature is there. Lot of
things need to be done before this feature becomes usable. I can do
them slowly, but experts in related areas are certainly welcome to
jump in and help me implement them in a more efficient and elegant
manner.
1. remove of
28 matches
Mail list logo
