On 8/31/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 31 August 2007 18:02:13 Bo Peng wrote: > > 1. remove of the compression feature (Jose, JMarc?)
> Why? > LyX supports compressed files in a clean way, so let us leave that way. > I don't want to appear rude but we should be very cautious about removing > features, and in this case the feature is well written and robust. How many > bug reports did we had about this? How many email messages? Because this feature more or less duplicates with embedding, and if we decide to go with .lyz for lyx bundle format, .lyx will always be a plain text file. > > 2. lyx2lyx support for embedding (Jose?) > > a) get lyx and/or manifest version from zipped file? > > b) unzip embedded file > > c) copy embedded files to their original places. (Dangerous, not > > sure what to do with files not in or under document directory). > > I think that you mean reverting to previous version here, right? Yes. > a) and b) are immediate, my problem is what to do with c). If the process is > done by lyx2lyx it will not be interactive so we must have a simple policy. Yes. That is why I say it is dangerous. I really do not know how to handle the extraction of files outside of the document directory. Bo
