On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Daniel Watkins wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Jean-Marc posted a bugzilla URL recently that displayed all 1.4.x bugs
> > with patches. Are you familiar with the "patch" utility to apply a patch
> > to your local copy of the repository? If not, holler :)
>
> I now have the
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc posted a bugzilla URL recently that displayed all 1.4.x bugs
> with patches. Are you familiar with the "patch" utility to apply a patch
> to your local copy of the repository? If not, holler :)
I now have the latest svn sources and have applied the patch to be test
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:17:05PM +, Daniel Watkins wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Jean-Marc posted a bugzilla URL recently that displayed all 1.4.x bugs
> > with patches. Are you familiar with the "patch" utility to apply a patch
> > to your local copy of the repository? If not, holler :)
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc posted a bugzilla URL recently that displayed all 1.4.x bugs
> with patches. Are you familiar with the "patch" utility to apply a patch
> to your local copy of the repository? If not, holler :)
I am. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with Subversion, so have nothing
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| If you look for patches with target 1.4.0, you will find only 4 bugs.
| One of them requires gcc 4.1, another one is trivial (restore banner),
Which one requires gcc 4.1?
| Lars, Jean-Marc, maybe you should list a few additional patches that
| you are w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read that patches need testing but I don't know which patches these
are, and where I could find a list of them.
The patches people talk about might be available through bugzilla - or at
least the should [1]. When someone refers to e.g. bug 2212 you can the bu
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Daniel Watkins wrote:
> The crux of this message is this:
> As a non-programmer, what can I do to help towards LyX 1.4.0 being released.
Testing this would probably be very helpful.
> I've read that patches need testing but I don't know which patches these
> are, and where I
Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hey list,
> I'm a non-programmer (well, I dabble in Python occasionally, but not enough
> to be useful). Despite this, I want to see the release of LyX 1.4.0 as much
> as anyone else (though I'll happily back up on that claim to save
> grief ;) ).
>
Hey list,
I'm a non-programmer (well, I dabble in Python occasionally, but not enough
to be useful). Despite this, I want to see the release of LyX 1.4.0 as much
as anyone else (though I'll happily back up on that claim to save
grief ;) ).
The crux of this message is this:
As a non-programmer, wha
