Re: Minor LyX comments

Pavel Sanda skrev: Paul A. Rubin wrote: I was thinking along the lines of Insert -> Figure -> Floating and Insert -> Figure -> Static (or something like that). Insert -> Figure -> Floating Good idea. Inserting a floating figure becomes as easy as a non-floating one, and the user see that th

Re: Minor LyX comments

Paul A. Rubin wrote: > I was thinking along the lines of Insert -> Figure -> Floating and Insert > -> Figure -> Static (or something like that). Insert -> Figure -> Floating this unfortuntely breaks the logic of the menu, where floats have their own subcategory. pavel

Re: Minor LyX comments

Will Robertson wrote: On 23/07/2008, at 12:55 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Will Robertson wrote: I've been meaning to pass on a few comments that I've collected over the years, but have hardly ever found the time. I took a look a

Re: Minor LyX comments

On 23/07/2008, at 12:55 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Will Robertson wrote: I've been meaning to pass on a few comments that I've collected over the years, but have hardly ever found the time. I took a look at Will's list, and in

Re: Minor LyX comments

Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: But I don't advocate that figure float are always created with an empty graphics inside. On the other hand combining the LFUN into a new action that do that would be very nice. for this you dont need new lfun, just combination of the existi

Re: Minor LyX comments

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > But I don't advocate that figure float are always created with an empty > graphics inside. On the other hand combining the LFUN into a new action > that do that would be very nice. for this you dont need new lfun, just combination of the existing will do. the real ques

Re: Minor LyX comments

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: Will Robertson wrote: I've been meaning to pass on a few comments that I've collected over the years, but have hardly ever found the time. I took a look at Will's list, and in se

Re: Minor LyX comments

Will Robertson wrote: Hi, I'm a LaTeX user that has to debug other people's LyX documents :) The work you guys do is great; every now and again I run into problems that perhaps could do with a fresh set of eyes, especially from the LaTeX side of the fence. Anyway, if it weren't for LyX then

Re: Minor LyX comments

Paul A. Rubin wrote: Will Robertson wrote: I've been meaning to pass on a few comments that I've collected over the years, but have hardly ever found the time. I took a look at Will's list, and in self-defense I have to vote

Re: Minor LyX comments

Will Robertson wrote: I've been meaning to pass on a few comments that I've collected over the years, but have hardly ever found the time. I took a look at Will's list, and in self-defense I have to vote against his first s

Re: Minor LyX comments

Will Robertson wrote: > I've been meaning to pass on a few comments that I've collected over   > the years, but have hardly ever found the time. >     Thanks indeed, Will. Your feedback is appreciated. Jürgen

Minor LyX comments

Hi, I'm a LaTeX user that has to debug other people's LyX documents :) The work you guys do is great; every now and again I run into problems that perhaps could do with a fresh set of eyes, especially from the LaTeX side of the fence. Anyway, if it weren't for LyX then I doubt I'd be able