Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > I've committed the two fixes for Qt4.5. thanks. > Are we set now or are there still more issues open ? no, we are ready now. I'll set up the final tarball now. > By the way, note that ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx is still not available, so > before releasing 1.6.2, we'll

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-14 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: The test tarball is available here: http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.6.2rc1.tar.gz If no regressions are reported, this will become LyX 1.6.2. Please test. Meanwhile, branch remains frozen until the freeze lift is announced (probably end of next week). Thanks, Jürg

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread rgheck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: (I wonder, however, why no one noticed earlier; am I the only one who uses branch for daily work?) I always do, but I've had so much administrative stuff to do that that kind of daily work hasn't been happening of late rh

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Konrad Hofbauer wrote: In 1.5.7, the screen scrolls half a screen. In 1.6.1, the screen scrolls one line. In most apps (TextEdit, TeXShop, Smultron) it scrolls half a screen. In some other apps (TextWrangler, Word) it scrolls one line. Personally, I prefer the 1.5.7-behaviour (recenter on scree

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: BH wrote: I've applied the equivalent patch to my local copy of 1.6.2. Jürgen: Shall I package up the unpatched version for distribution (and risk complaints) or stick with the current 1.6.2? Uh ... what I meant was Well, you know what I meant. O

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > OK, OK. Since it seems so important to all of you, apply to branch, and > > I'm gonna build another tarball on Friday. > > I did it myself. I probably can build another tarball today. http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.6.2rc2.tar.gz Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > OK, OK. Since it seems so important to all of you, apply to branch, and I'm > gonna build another tarball on Friday. I did it myself. I probably can build another tarball today. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Vincent, I have already copied the content of status.16x to ANNOUNCE. Could > you please add the description to both files? Well, since it's a regression, no description is needed anyway. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-09 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
BH wrote: > > I've applied the equivalent patch to my local copy of 1.6.2. Jürgen: > > Shall I package up the unpatched version for distribution (and risk > > complaints) or stick with the current 1.6.2? > > Uh ... what I meant was Well, you know what I meant. OK, OK. Since it seems so impor

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread BH
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:07 PM, BH wrote: > I've applied the equivalent patch to my local copy of 1.6.2. Jürgen: > Shall I package up the unpatched version for distribution (and risk > complaints) or stick with the current 1.6.2? Uh ... what I meant was Well, you know what I meant. Bennett

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread BH
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Fixed in trunk: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28730 > > Is this better ? > > Vincent Yes -- much. Thanks! (Can it be applied to branch, too?) I've applied the equivalent patch to my local copy of 1.6.2. Jürgen: Shall I package u

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I am going to bet that you will have a lot > of complains... i have the same feeling pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 08/03/2009 16:24, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: BH wrote: It used to be (with 1.6.1) that when the cursor was at the bottom of the screen and was pressed, the screen would scroll down one line, leaving the cursor still at the bottom. Now, pressing will scroll a f

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: It used to be (with 1.6.1) that when the cursor was at the bottom of the screen and was pressed, the screen would scroll down one line, leaving the cursor still at the bottom. Which is both expected behavior and desired when one is reading throug

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 08/03/2009 16:24, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: BH wrote: It used to be (with 1.6.1) that when the cursor was at the bottom of the screen and was pressed, the screen would scroll down one line, leaving the cursor still at the bottom. Now, pressing will scroll a full screen, so that the cur

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
BH wrote: It used to be (with 1.6.1) that when the cursor was at the bottom of the screen and was pressed, the screen would scroll down one line, leaving the cursor still at the bottom. Now, pressing will scroll a *full* screen, so that the cursor is at the next line in the document but at the

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
BH wrote: > It used to be (with 1.6.1) that when the cursor was at the bottom of > the screen and was pressed, the screen would scroll down > one line, leaving the cursor still at the bottom. Now, pressing > will scroll a full screen, so that the cursor is at the > next line in the document but a

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread BH
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > The test tarball is available here: > http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.6.2rc1.tar.gz > > If no regressions are reported, this will become LyX 1.6.2. Please test. > > Meanwhile, branch remains frozen until the freeze lift is announced (prob

LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

2009-03-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
The test tarball is available here: http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.6.2rc1.tar.gz If no regressions are reported, this will become LyX 1.6.2. Please test. Meanwhile, branch remains frozen until the freeze lift is announced (probably end of next week). Thanks, Jürgen