On 2016-04-11, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 09.04.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> But more importantly: agutex2015.cls is obsolete:
...
>> However, on the first URL, there is a link called
>> "zip file"
>> https://publications.agu.org/files/2016/03/AGUJournal_Feb18_2016.zip
>> which downloads
Am 09.04.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Guenter Milde:
AGUTeX was not discussed yet, did I miss a +1?
I always talked about these 2 layouts, ACm and AGU.
There are just 3 new styles and not any removed one. So instead of
literally copying the layout, we can Input agutex.layout and use just 46
lines o
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:25:41AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:18:43PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 10. April 2016 um 11:26:51, schrieb Richard Heck
> >
> > > On 04/10/2016 03:53 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:16:32PM +00
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:18:43PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. April 2016 um 11:26:51, schrieb Richard Heck
> > On 04/10/2016 03:53 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:16:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > >> I believe,
> > >>
> > >> * there is no point
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2016 um 11:26:51, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 04/10/2016 03:53 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:16:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> I believe,
> >>
> >> * there is no point in providing a new layout for an obsoleted class file,
> > +1
>
> Just to
On 04/10/2016 03:53 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:16:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I believe,
>>
>> * there is no point in providing a new layout for an obsoleted class file,
> +1
Just to be clear: There's no point providing a NEW layout for an
obsolete class file.
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:16:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-04-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Am 07.04.2016 um 18:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >>> I'd ask Uwe first to comit his patch -- it is his layout and he has done
> >>> more work.
>
> >> Makes sense. Uwe, can you please commit? Th
On 2016-04-09, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 07.04.2016 um 18:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>>> I'd ask Uwe first to comit his patch -- it is his layout and he has done
>>> more work.
>> Makes sense. Uwe, can you please commit? Thanks for your patch.
> It is in now. AGUTeX is in now as well accordingly.
Am 07.04.2016 um 18:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I'd ask Uwe first to comit his patch -- it is his layout and he has done
more work.
Makes sense. Uwe, can you please commit? Thanks for your patch.
It is in now. AGUTeX is in now as well accordingly.
So from my side everything is in shape for
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:43:39PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > I'd ask Uwe first to comit his patch -- it is his layout and he has done
> > more work.
>
> Makes sense. Uwe, can you please commit? Thanks for your patch.
>
> >
On 2016-04-08, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:39:55AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wr
On 04/08/2016 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:39:55AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Still, the noncontroversial pat
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:39:55AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> >> Still, the noncontroversial patch for aastex was put on hold.
>
> > Plea
On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Still, the noncontroversial patch for aastex was put on hold.
> Please commit that. Thanks for the patch.
Here is the complete patch. OK so?
Gü
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Still, the noncontroversial patch for aastex was put on hold.
Please commit that. Thanks for the patch.
> > Please go ahead and commit the needed changes.
>
> I'd ask Uwe first to comit
On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:06:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> I agree. I actually don't think there is a need for a vote because the
>> majority of those who took part in the discussion prefer for a new
>> layout file. I'm glad that we took the time to
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:06:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> I agree. I actually don't think there is a need for a vote because the
> majority of those who took part in the discussion prefer for a new
> layout file. I'm glad that we took the time to discuss this issue (and
> we have been w
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:37:00PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> It seems to me that, despite Guenter's recent change of mind, there is a
> clear majority in favor of the policy that was proposed some time ago,
> discussed on the list, and then documented, in draft form, in
> Development.lyx, nam
It seems to me that, despite Guenter's recent change of mind, there is a
clear majority in favor of the policy that was proposed some time ago,
discussed on the list, and then documented, in draft form, in
Development.lyx, namely:
> Every now and then, there are changes to LaTeX document classes
19 matches
Mail list logo
