On 2016-04-08, Richard Heck wrote: > On 04/08/2016 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:39:55AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: >>>>> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>>>> Still, the noncontroversial patch for aastex was put on hold. >>>> Please commit that. Thanks for the patch. >>> Here is the complete patch. OK so? >> It looks good. Thanks for updating the tests also.
>> Please commit. >> If I remember correctly, we did not arrive to an agreement for what to name >> the template file, right? In this example, we did not decide whether the >> template for aastex6 should be aastex.lyx or aastex6.lyx? I am just asking >> for my own memory, not that you should change it to aastex6.lyx. > In this case, since the class has a completely new name, it seems > reasonable for the template to have that name, too. In the case where > the class has the same name, but it's been updated, it seems reasonable > for the template to keep the same name, and not to be versioned. > Richard Changed and committed. Günter
