> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I don't get what you are aiming at. hmmm I thing you are reading
Lars> me wrong, what I am saying that when override_deadkey == false
Lars> _then_ there are no other way to make dead_keys work than
Lars> binding them to the app
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
| Lars> Lars> I thought you said that it wor
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> I thought you said that it work when you flipped the |
Lars> Lars> overide_deadkey? | | La
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I thought you said that it work when you flipped the
| Lars> overide_deadkey?
|
| Lars> to have it working you must bind the deadkey to accent-XX.
|
| With 1.1.5, both m
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I thought you said that it work when you flipped the
Lars> overide_deadkey?
Lars> to have it working you must bind the deadkey to accent-XX.
With 1.1.5, both methods did work. Therefore, there should be a way to
make it work
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I still do not understand why dead keys do not work with 0.88.1, but
| maybe I will find out :) What would you try to look for? The
| differences in lyxlookup.C are really minor.
I thought you said that it work when you flipped the overide_dead
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Lars> | BTW, how do you intercept deadkeys with 0.89? It seems
Lars> to me | Lars> that you | do not. | | Lars> in 0.89 deadkeys are
Lars> handled by xforms. | | I though
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | BTW, how do you intercept deadkeys with 0.89? It seems to me
| Lars> that you | do not.
|
| Lars> in 0.89 deadkeys are handled by xforms.
|
| I thought you much prefered to intercept the deadkeys and handle them
| via LyX?
I have chan
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lars> writes: | | Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gull
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
| Lars> Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test. | | It
Lars> still does not work with 0.8
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test.
|
| It still does not work with 0.88.1
Works in 0.89 so looks like a problem with lyxlookup.
Override-X-deadkey?
|
| L
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test.
It still does not work with 0.88.1
Lars> For all I know, KP_x have also been fixed by this.
Yes, these work.
JMarc
PS: here is the output when typing dead_acute and 'e'.
Wo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.171
| diff -u -p -r1.171 lyxfunc.C
| --- lyxfunc.C 2000/12/18 14:21:57 1.171
| +++ lyxfunc.C 2000/12/18 22:04:19
| @@ -273,10 +273,16 @@ int LyXFunc::proces
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I see that I have some more fixing to do...
|
| I would say that you are on the rigth track. Thanks.
Please try this (untested) patch.
Lgb
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C,v
retrieving revision 1.171
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 10:37:13PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | The result is funny, but it shouldn't surprise you. :-)
> | Next table gives the key in the first column, and the output in the
> | second, for the numerical keypad
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:25:41PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > Can you check the current CVS and see if the problem has been fixed?
| > (I know that XForms 0.89 are not handled correctly currently)
|
| The result is funny,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:25:41PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Can you check the current CVS and see if the problem has been fixed?
> (I know that XForms 0.89 are not handled correctly currently)
The result is funny, but it shouldn't surprise you. :-)
Next table gives the key in th
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I had open a new document, typed every key in the number pad area,
| including enter (as you can see) and exited after that.
|
| I looked for forms.h and I am using 0.88 fixlevel 1. I don't have any
| problem changing to 0.89.x but I a
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dead keys are working (hard ;-).
good.
| But you also said previously:
|
| > For all I know, KP_x have also been fixed by this.
|
| And I interpreted that as the numerical key pad keys. Ok, I was wrong :),
| it happens.
No, not
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:12:01PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Those are not dead keys.
> Are _dead_ keys working?
Dead keys are working (hard ;-).
But you also said previously:
> For all I know, KP_x have also been fixed by this.
And I interpreted that as the numerical ke
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 06:54:19AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | >
| > | > Can you enable action too?
| > | >
| > | >-dbg key,action
|
| > I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test.
|
| I tested and still no output
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 06:54:19AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | >
> | > Can you enable action too?
> | >
> | >-dbg key,action
> I belive I have fixed this bug now. Please test.
I tested and still no output. I noticed that the debug output is richer so
I am sending again the repo
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 02:26:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > | > Until then I will ju
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Is this the "use std::container in kbsequence" patch that did
| Lars> this or is it that we somewhere use kbsequence incorrectly...
|
| I tried to replace the kbsequence.
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Is this the "use std::container in kbsequence" patch that did
Lars> this or is it that we somewhere use kbsequence incorrectly...
I tried to replace the kbsequence.[Ch] from 1.1.5 in 1.1.6cvs (I just
had to add a parse(string
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 02:26:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > | > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
> |
> | ;-)
>
> Can you enable a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Run with -dbg key,action
|
| Lars> and you will see something interesting.
|
| Nothing very exciting here. I begin to suspect something goes wrong in
| kbsequence (or so
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Run with -dbg key,action
Lars> and you will see something interesting.
Nothing very exciting here. I begin to suspect something goes wrong in
kbsequence (or somewhere else?). Anyway the problem as I report it has
nothing to d
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> something must have changed... do others also see this problem
| Lars> with dead keys and XForms 0.88?
|
| In fact, with latest cvs, I am not able to use the accent-acute
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> something must have changed... do others also see this problem
Lars> with dead keys and XForms 0.88?
In fact, with latest cvs, I am not able to use the accent-acute
function. It produces stupid input. I thought I was supposed
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
|
| ;-)
Can you enable action too?
-dbg key,action
Lgb
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
;-)
Workarea event: KEYBOARD
XLookupBoth/
WorkArea: Key is slash' [47]
WorkArea: Keysym is KP_Divide' [65455]
Workarea Diff: 1698151594
KeySym is KP_Divide[65455]
Key [9
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> _or_ really since this is supposed to be handled by lyxlookup,
Lars> something has changed there?
No, I had reverted lyxlookup mostly to the state it was in 1.1.5 (I
remove dependency on xforms headers, since it does not make
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I began looking at this... but I am not going too look any further
| > until I get a good bug report.
| >
| > Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
|
|
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I began looking at this... but I am not going too look any further
> until I get a good bug report.
>
> Until then I will just put it down as "not-a-bug".
Ok, I got the point. Do you see this behaviour?
> Lgb
--
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > something must have changed... do others also see this problem with
| > dead keys and XForms 0.88?
| >
| > Lgb
|
| Not directly related I know, but in
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > something must have changed... do others also see this problem with
| > dead keys and XForms 0.88?
| >
| > Lgb
|
| Not directly related I know, but in
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> something must have changed... do others also see this problem with
> dead keys and XForms 0.88?
>
> Lgb
Not directly related I know, but in pre2 (I have not tried the more recent
cvs) I am unable to use the numer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars,
|
| I am not able to make dead keys work with xforms 0.88. Here is the
| output I get when typing dead_acute+e:
|
| Workarea event: KEYBOARD
| XLookupBoth ´
| WorkArea: Key is `acute' [180]
| WorkArea: Keysym is `dead_acute' [65105]
| W
Lars,
I am not able to make dead keys work with xforms 0.88. Here is the
output I get when typing dead_acute+e:
Workarea event: KEYBOARD
XLookupBoth ´
WorkArea: Key is `acute' [180]
WorkArea: Keysym is `dead_acute' [65105]
Workarea Diff: 1596210107
KeySym is dead_acute[65105]
Key [-1][dead_acut
41 matches
Mail list logo
