On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 10:37:13PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |   The result is funny, but it shouldn't surprise you. :-)
> |   Next table gives the key in the first column, and the output in the
> | second, for the numerical keypad.
> |   
> |   / KP_Divide
> |   * KP_Multiply
> |   - KP_Subtract
> |   + KP_Add
> |   Enter     KP_Enter
> |   . KP_Decimal
> |   0 KP_0
> |   1 KP_1
> |   2 KP_2
> |   3 KP_3
> |   4 KP_4
> |   5 KP_5
> |   6 KP_6
> |   7 KP_7
> |   8 KP_8
> |   9 KP_9
> 
> :-)

  :-)
  
> Isn't that what you wanted?

  No quite, I am a very demanding person, what would my students say if for
test I replaced all those keys? A riot, at least...

> I see that I have some more fixing to do...

  I would say that you are on the rigth track. Thanks.
  
>         Lgb

-- 
José

Reply via email to