Branch Open Again

2013-05-07 Thread Richard Heck
Branch is open again for commits. The official release of 2.0.6 will be tomorrow. Richard

Branch OPEN

2012-02-28 Thread Richard Heck
The release of 2.0.3 will be announced once the webserver changeover is complete. But everything is uploaded to ftp and being propogated. So branch is open again. Richard

branch open again

2009-09-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Now that the Mac binary is ready, the freeze is lifted. Thanks for your patience, Jürgen

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Bennett testing would be welcome of course but you don't need him to > know if performance is better (especially since he's got is much > powerful box now). "-dbg painting" will tell you all. Compare the > console output of the patched and unpatched version while typing i

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:13:58 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't > > see any problem. > > It looks good on a first glance, and it seems to work fine on my box. > However, > I'd

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't see any problem. It looks good on a first glance, and it seems to work fine on my box. However, I'd like it to be tested a bit. Expecially, I'd like a Mac user (Bennett?)

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't > see any problem. It looks good on a first glance, and it seems to work fine on my box. However, I'd like it to be tested a bit. Expecially, I'd like a Mac user (Bennett?) to test whether this has

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't see any problem. It's on my list. Please give me some time to look through it. No problem. Maybe some other volunteers would like to test it too? Abdel.

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't > see any problem. It's on my list. Please give me some time to look through it. Jürgen

wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: the remaining po and doc changes can immediately be committed. What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't see any problem. Abdel. Index: BufferView.cpp === --- BufferView.cp

branch open again

2007-10-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
the remaining po and doc changes can immediately be committed. Jürgen P.S.: even though I was added to the whitelist, my announcement mail to lyx-announce bounced. I contacted Mate and I try to send out another announcement mail later today.