Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 08:57:38PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 21:50 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Tested, works, committed. Pavel > > Thank you. Thanks, José! Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.ly

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 21:50 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Tested, works, committed. Pavel Thank you. -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 07:47:04PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > What about this change? With the attached patch I get: Tested, works, committed. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 11:13 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:45:22AM +, José Matos wrote: > > > Python detected: python3 -tt > > > > Thinking aloud... here we could also output the Python version, for > > consistency sake... > > +1 > > Scott What about this change

Re: Beta 2?

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 08:33:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The level of warnings is now much mower, but I still see some about the > deprecation of std::unary_fonction and std::binary_function. We could either > backport the 4 patches below or keep things as they are, since the functor

Re: Beta 2?

Le 10/01/2023 à 22:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Right. Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings these days. So, I upgraded boost to 1.81 (latest) in master and 1.75 in stabl

Beta 2 Preview

Source and binaries for LyX 2.4 Beta 2 are now available here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ These are provided for testing purposes only. That said, many of the developers (including me) have been using 2.4 for daily work, without serious problems. But you should expect some bugs

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On 1/22/23 13:37, José Matos wrote: On Sun, 2023-01-22 at 11:46 +, José Matos wrote: This is not a difficult problem but it takes time to get all the packages right. It would be nice to have an automatic way to do this but for now I settled for the manual solution. @Riki since you also use

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview

On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 2:47 PM Eric Barkan wrote: > As requested, I've compiled the user guide with 2.4.0-beta2 on Fedora 37. > The compile succeeds and the resulting PDF looks perfect, at least on a > quick scan-through. However, I noticed that instant preview is not working > for the UserGuid

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview

As requested, I've compiled the user guide with 2.4.0-beta2 on Fedora 37. The compile succeeds and the resulting PDF looks perfect, at least on a quick scan-through.  However, I noticed that instant preview is not working for the UserGuide.lyx file, similarly to my originally posted bug, and th

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Sun, 2023-01-22 at 11:46 +, José Matos wrote: > This is not a difficult problem but it takes time to get all the > packages right. It would be nice to have an automatic way to do this > but for now I settled for the manual solution. @Riki since you also use Fedora, but this also applies to

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Sat, 2023-01-21 at 17:19 -0800, Eric Barkan wrote: > Success!  I tried installing texlive-cprotect per @nealbecker and the > problem was fixed.  Thanks to you both. > Just in case it's still of interest I ran lyx-devel -dbg graphics in > the repaired system.  All earlier error messages are gone.

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

11, 2022) Qt Version (run-time): 5.15.8 on platform xcb Qt Version (compile-time): 5.15.8 OS Version (run-time): Fedora Linux 37 (Thirty Seven) Python detected: python3 -tt Python --version gives "Python 3.11.1" Also, I've tried running beta-2 from a terminal and I find that "

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

> > > > Qt Version (run-time): 5.15.8 on platform xcb > > Qt Version (compile-time): 5.15.8 > > OS Version (run-time): Fedora Linux 37 (Thirty Seven) > > Python detected: python3 -tt > > > > Python --version gives "Python 3.11.1" > > > > Als

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

15.8 > OS Version (run-time): Fedora Linux 37 (Thirty Seven) > Python detected: python3 -tt > > Python --version gives "Python 3.11.1" > > Also, I've tried running beta-2 from a terminal and I find that > "Error: > No DVI or PDF output. latex failed."

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

I have some new information.  I did a clean install of F37 on a virtual machine.  Although I usually use KDE, I used the vanilla Fedora iso install which uses Gnome, so as to avoid any non-standard surprises.  At first, I didn't even update the system before doing the following. I installed ly

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

om "Copy version info": Version 2.4.0-beta2 (Sunday, December 11, 2022) Qt Version (run-time): 5.15.8 on platform xcb Qt Version (compile-time): 5.15.8 OS Version (run-time): Fedora Linux 37 (Thirty Seven) Python detected: python3 -tt Python --version gives "Python 3.11.1" Also,

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:45:22AM +, José Matos wrote: > Python detected: python3 -tt > > Thinking aloud... here we could also output the Python version, for > consistency sake... +1 Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 08:45 +, José Matos wrote: > What do you get from Help -> About LyX, in the Version tab you have > an > option to "Copy Version Info". In my case I have: > > Version 2.4.0-beta2 > (Sunday, 11 December 2022) FWIW, and unrelated to this case it would be also probably nice

Re: 2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 18:06 -0800, Eric Barkan wrote: > As a long time user of LyX, I want to thank you all for this awesome > piece of software.  Couldn't live without it! Thank you. :-) > I installed lyx-devel-2.4.0~beta2-1 and its dependencies from the > jamatos copr lyx-devel repository for F

2.4.0-beta-2 possible regression: Float inset stops instant preview functionality in Fedora 37 X86_64

As a long time user of LyX, I want to thank you all for this awesome piece of software.  Couldn't live without it! I installed lyx-devel-2.4.0~beta2-1 and its dependencies from the jamatos copr lyx-devel repository for Fedora 37 X86_64 using dnf.  The program starts and functions normally as f

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 13:44 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Please produce binaries. > > Riki I build it for several architectures and base OS, Fedora and RHEL compatible. I will probably ignore RHEL-7 because it is becoming too

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Got it thanks. On 1/11/23 19:22, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 11.01.2023 um 19:44 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : Here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Please produce binaries. I’ve built the binaries for Mac and put them here: https://my.hidrive.com/share/ydfg5l8ppq * build on B

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Mi., 11. Jan. 2023 um 19:45 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Please produce binaries. Done and uploaded to google drive. -- Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-d

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On 1/12/23 05:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 11/01/2023 à 19:44, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Please produce binaries. What git commit is this? Not a 2022-12-11 version as configure.ac says, I guess, but tagging it may be useful.

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:44:37PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Here: > >     http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Seems to work on debian stable. P -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Le 11/01/2023 à 19:44, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Here:     http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Please produce binaries. What git commit is this? Not a 2022-12-11 version as configure.ac says, I guess, but tagging it may be useful. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lis

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am 11.01.2023 um 19:44 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Please produce binaries. I’ve built the binaries for Mac and put them here: https://my.hidrive.com/share/ydfg5l8ppq * build on BigSur for Intel and Apple chips (minimum macOS

Beta 2 Tarballs

Here:     http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Please produce binaries. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Beta 2?

On 1/10/23 16:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Right. Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings these days. I'll build beta 2 in the next couple days. When that's done, t

Re: Beta 2?

Right. Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings these days. JMarc Le 10 janvier 2023 21:50:06 GMT+01:00, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >Seem like a good time to do bet

Beta 2?

Seem like a good time to do beta 2? Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Fr., 16. Dez. 2022 um 00:46 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@gmail.com>: > On 12/15/22 13:25, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Do., 15. Dez. 2022 um 06:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin >: > >> Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : >> >>> So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work?

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On 12/15/22 13:25, Yu Jin wrote: Am Do., 15. Dez. 2022 um 06:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work? Yes Actually, if you are going to make these again, can you please include the atta

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Do., 15. Dez. 2022 um 06:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > >> So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work? >> >> >> Yes > Actually, if you are going to make these again, can you please include the attached patch? It fixes the QtZlib issue w

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work? > > > Yes -- Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

vel Sanda wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >>>> Tarballs for beta 2 are at: >>>> >>>> http://www.frege.org/transfer/ >>>> >>>> Let's test these a bit

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

> > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > > > > >

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

t; > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > > > > > > > > > > Let's test these a bit before pr

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

; On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >>>> Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > >>>> > >>>> Let's test these a bit before proceeding to

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

wrote: > >>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >>>> Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > >>>> > >>>> Let's test these a bit before

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On 12/12/22 04:01, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Tarballs for beta 2 are at: http://www.frege.org/transfer

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > > > > > http://www.fr

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > > > http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > > > > Let's test these a bit before proceeding to b

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > > Let's test these a bit before proceeding to binaries. (Also, of course, we > have 2.3.7 to deal with.) On a first sight seem to wo

Beta 2 Tarballs

Tarballs for beta 2 are at: http://www.frege.org/transfer/ Let's test these a bit before proceeding to binaries. (Also, of course, we have 2.3.7 to deal with.) Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.2.0 (beta 2)

Public release of LyX version 2.2.0beta2 We are proud to announce the second public beta release of the new LyX 2.2 series. With this release, LyX celebrates 20 years of existence. The 2.2 series has a rich set of new features compared to the current stabl

RE: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 2)

ncent van Ravesteijn > Sent: zondag 24 november 2013 20:18 > To: lyx-devel; LyX User; lyx-annou...@lists.lyx.org > Subject: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 2) > Importance: Low > > Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta2 > > >

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 2)

Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta2 We are proud to announce the second public beta release of the new LyX 2.1 series. With this release, LyX celebrates 18 years of existence. The 2.1 series has a rich set of new features compared to the current stab

Re: single instance issues (was 'Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)')

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > You must have a working lyxpipe. See Section 5.2 of the > > "Additional Features" manual for how to set up it. > > > Nice, it works now. Thanks a lot for implementing th

Re: single instance issues (was 'Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)')

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > You must have a working lyxpipe. See Section 5.2 of the > "Additional Features" manual for how to set up it. > Nice, it works now. Thanks a lot for implementing this feature. If I understand correctly, LyX cannot (or doesn't want to) aut

Re: single instance issues (was 'Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)')

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:28:01PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: > Dear all > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2) > > == > > > [..] > > * externally launche

single instance issues (was 'Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)')

Dear all On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2) > == > [..] > * externally launched documents are now possible to load in an already >  running LyX instance > I cannot get this

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: > I have installed the Beta2 in Mac OSX. It just works out of the box. > Magnificent! > I have also read in detail the WhatsNew page and the additions are really > impressive (I love many of them: Sweave support, inline spell-check, native > sp

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

2.0.0 (beta 2) == We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0. Due to the many reports we received, support for polyglossia, XeTeX's new language interface and babel replacement, has been added. In the same vein we added basi

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2) > == > > We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0. > A lot of nifty features and fixes! Thanks for letting in s

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 12/07/2010 05:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> >> We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0. > > Is there a Windows version of LyX 2 somewhere? > Yes. Uwe usually announces the availability of Win binaries severa

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

On 12/07/2010 05:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0. Is there a Windows version of LyX 2 somewhere?

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2)

Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 2) == We are pleased to announce the second public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0. Due to the many reports we received, support for polyglossia, XeTeX's new language interface and babel replacement, has been added. I

Re: Freezing trunk for beta 2

Am 05.12.2010 um 00:50 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > hi, > > as announced we enter soft freeze of trunk at the deepest night sunday 7am CET > (or in other words if you are still awake now feel free to finish stuff you > are working on). > > sun/mon we should touch code only when some critical or embar

Freezing trunk for beta 2

hi, as announced we enter soft freeze of trunk at the deepest night sunday 7am CET (or in other words if you are still awake now feel free to finish stuff you are working on). sun/mon we should touch code only when some critical or embarrassing bug appears otherwise only doc/translations(po/ is

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

eta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta >>> 2). >>> >>> As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that >>> there are no embarrassing bugs. I mean in this case a failure to >>> compile, on any of our traditional platforms, o

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Typically -j3 is a better choice than -j2 on dual core machines, as not everything is processor-bound. Sure, maybe the reason. Note that multiple concurrent processes intensively accessing one res

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > Typically -j3 is a better choice than -j2 on dual core machines, as not > > everything is processor-bound. > > Sure, maybe the reason. Note that multiple concurrent processes intensively > accessing one resource (say memory or

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >> > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > writes: >> > >> >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now >> >> renamed to note that it's explicitly

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed > >> to note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > > > Note that compil

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Le 6 juin 08 à 23:12, Alfredo Braunstein a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core machines. faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Yes, it is a bit faster. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Alfredo Braunstein wrote: José Matos wrote: On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. Good to know... I wonder why. My understanding is that launching 2 compilat

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> faster than -j2 or was it a typo? > > Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. Good to know... I wonder why. A/

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. > A/ -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed >> to note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core > machines. faster than -j2 or wa

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed > to > > note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much fa

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

"Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed to > note that it's explicitly for Mac). Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core machines. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed to note that it's explicitly for Mac). Thanks for the cleaning-up! I would suggest the follwing changes (see attached): 1) The HostSystemIntel and HostSystemPPC variables should NOT be changed ever as long as we support 10.4

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure reported some errors. I

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 13:53:39 Pavel Sanda wrote: > for example today is so beautiful sunny day that i can even smell beta3 in > the air don't you think? :)) > pavel I do. :-) I will expand this in a new thread. -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 14:17:56 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > 2) sounds good as it also convey the information as a "mini-freeze". > > +1 Fair enough. I will try this for the next release. :-) > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Te

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When >> executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure rep

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Btw there's one more mall quirk: When opening a new document the top line > is partly hidden by the toolbar, i.e. the crolling i wrong. I think I > remember this being mentioned before, but can't find it in bugzilla. > ht

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On 3 jun 2008, at 18.20, Bennett Helm wrote: - In the tutorial there are some button-figures missing I don't see this. Is it just that the graphics aren't displaying for you? Strange, now it works... Before some figures where replaced by black squares, but now it's fine. Anyway no big deal

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When > executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure reported some > errors. > It seems there were some stray invisible characters in th

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 jun 2008, at 16.15, Bennett Helm wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> Bennett Helm wrote: >>> >>> I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. >>>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On 3 jun 2008, at 16.15, Bennett Helm wrote: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Bennett Helm wrote: I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? Yes. I've posted a Mac package here:

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > >> Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: >> >> LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..> < >> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Universal.dmg> >> >> Konrad and Anders, could you both test it -- r

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..> Konrad and Anders, could you both test it -- running the installer as well -- to see if it works for you? Works fine here on Intel Mac OS

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: > If so, that means that you can (and should) build the release > version yourself again, right? > > > Yes, at least to the "can" part. ... And "should" because of the following reason. > That might also solve the crash occurring with George. > > > I hope so. I'm

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > >> I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. >> > > Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? If so, that means that you can (and should) build the release version yourself again, right? That might also solve the crash occurring with George. /Konrad

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Bennett, Anders, >> >> please find at >> >> a universal binary built

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 2) change the configure.ac to the release tag, and works for some >> days in that state before reverting to svn after tagging the >> release. > > 2) sounds good as it also convey the information as a "mini-freeze". +1 JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> Would it be worth to release beta 3 with this problem fixed or should we >>> publically announce beta 2 remarking the known problems? >>> >> >> i would vote for beta 3 if you are able to prepare it very soon. >> othe

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

problem was the update problem from lyx2lyx. This was fixed by Richard yesterday. Would it be worth to release beta 3 with this problem fixed or should we publically announce beta 2 remarking the known problems? i would vote for beta 3 if you are able to prepare it very soon. otherwise

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

t; > The only glaring remaining problem was the update problem from lyx2lyx. This > was fixed by Richard yesterday. > > Would it be worth to release beta 3 with this problem fixed or should we > publically announce beta 2 remarking the known problems? i would vote for beta 3 if y

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

we are using a beta or svn release. There are two options: 1) to document and use the options used by default for beta. 2) change the configure.ac to the release tag, and works for some days in that state before reverting to svn after tagging the release. 2) sounds good as it also convey

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

from lyx2lyx. This was fixed by Richard yesterday. Would it be worth to release beta 3 with this problem fixed or should we publically announce beta 2 remarking the known problems? -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

beta or svn release. There are two options: 1) to document and use the options used by default for beta. 2) change the configure.ac to the release tag, and works for some days in that state before reverting to svn after tagging the release. I accept other ideas. :-) > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 02 June 2008 17:39:34 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> In the future, I think you should tag a betaXrc1 before tagging >> betaX, as stupid as it may seem (or just package a particular svn >> revision). > > In the past we have never announced beta

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the > developers list. ok, and what do you plan now :) ? pavel

  1   2   3   4   >