Re: Multiple extensions and backward compatibility ?

2011-09-15 Thread Julien Rioux
On 15/09/2011 10:15 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 09/15/2011 03:58 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Il 15/09/2011 14:08, Richard Heck ha scritto: Are you using the same user directory for trunk and branch? I have to confess I never cared about this, however once I believed that the system-wide lyx

Re: Multiple extensions and backward compatibility ?

2011-09-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 09/15/2011 03:58 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Il 15/09/2011 14:08, Richard Heck ha scritto: > >> Are you using the same user directory for trunk and branch? > > I have to confess I never cared about this, however once I believed > that the system-wide lyx was using ~/.lyx, whilst the svn versi

Re: Multiple extensions and backward compatibility ?

2011-09-15 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Il 15/09/2011 14:08, Richard Heck ha scritto: On 09/15/2011 05:31 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Hi, I just noticed I cannot start anymore the system-provided LyX on my Ubuntu 11.04. It say "Cannot read the configuration file". AFAICGuess, this might be due to the new multi-format-extension pat

Re: Multiple extensions and backward compatibility ?

2011-09-15 Thread Julien Rioux
On 15/09/2011 11:31 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Hi, I just noticed I cannot start anymore the system-provided LyX on my Ubuntu 11.04. It say "Cannot read the configuration file". AFAICGuess, this might be due to the new multi-format-extension patch. The problem is that I cannot start LyX anym

Re: Multiple extensions and backward compatibility ?

2011-09-15 Thread Richard Heck
On 09/15/2011 05:31 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed I cannot start anymore the system-provided LyX on my > Ubuntu 11.04. > > It say "Cannot read the configuration file". > > AFAICGuess, this might be due to the new multi-format-extension patch. > The problem is that I cannot s

Multiple extensions and backward compatibility ?

2011-09-15 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Hi, I just noticed I cannot start anymore the system-provided LyX on my Ubuntu 11.04. It say "Cannot read the configuration file". AFAICGuess, this might be due to the new multi-format-extension patch. The problem is that I cannot start LyX anymore, so I cannot reconfigure (of course I can

Re: Backward Compatibility.

2007-07-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would appreciate it if someone can tell me why the > backward-compatibility is broken. Your problem is bug 4037: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4037 Jürgen

Re: Backward Compatibility.

2007-07-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Attached is an example I cut down to something simple. > I hope you accept attachments otherwise I will put it on one of my sites. Attachments are fine, as long as they aren't too big. There seem to be several problems in your file, the most severe is that the paragrap

Re: Backward Compatibility.

2007-07-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? The problem is that I have hundreds of LyX files that cannot be processed with the newer LyX versions anymore and that creates some headaches for me. Also note that I used a STANDARD template Din-brief_en. I would appreciate it if someone can tell me why the backward-compatibility is broken

Re: Backward Compatibility.

2007-07-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
example.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: Backward Compatibility.

2007-07-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lventer" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] us <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lventer> My problem is that I have hundreds of Letters that I cannot Lventer> open anymore as the new versions object compiling them. Lventer> If there is something simple you know of how to fix this, let Lventer> me know, otherw

Backward Compatibility.

2007-07-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use Lyx quite extensively to write most of my letters. Reason is I use LaTeX in my work so it is a nice compliment. However, I found that the last two versions of Lyx could not process any of my older lyx files. The error I get was that something needs to be inserted. DVI files could obvious