> On Jul 25, 2018, at 1:01 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 24.07.2018, 16:05 -0700 schrieb list_em...@icloud.com:
>> This is an old problem that I know I filed a ticket on years ago.
>
> You remember which?
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9316
>
>> The dialog for Cross Re
Am Dienstag, den 24.07.2018, 16:05 -0700 schrieb list_em...@icloud.com:
> This is an old problem that I know I filed a ticket on years ago.
You remember which?
> The dialog for Cross References attempts to display the entire path
> to the file in a pop-up menu, regardless of how long the file pa
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars> |
Lars> | > Ok, using Opera I get the same problem
Lars> |
Lars> | This is now bug 2260
Lars> |
Lars> | http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2260
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| > Ok, using Opera I get the same problem
|
| This is now bug 2260
|
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2260
Nothing has changed on the server...
--
Lgb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, using Opera I get the same problem
This is now bug 2260
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2260
regards Uwe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you give a link I can test this from Opera (I need the link to be sure
I'm testing the right thing:)
Download for example the attached zip-file from bug2176
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2176
regards Uwe
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If you give a link I can test this from Opera (I need the link to be sure
> > I'm testing the right thing:)
>
> Download for example the attached zip-file from bug2176
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2176
Ok, u
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Whenever I want to download an attachment of a bug, my browser wants to
> save it as "attachment.cgi" and says the type is "CGI file", no matter
> what the real type is. That means the original attachment name an
Whenever I want to download an attachment of a bug, my browser wants to
save it as "attachment.cgi" and says the type is "CGI file", no matter
what the real type is. That means the original attachment name and the
information if it is "application/x-lyx" or e.g
Recipient of the infected attachment: Sun, Wei\Inbox
Subject of the message: %n!! whats up
One or more attachments were deleted
Attachment Out.bat was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus W32.Klez.H@mm was found.
The following message contained an attachment type which is not permitted
by the BSOS email system and was removed.
Information about the problem message:
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO: [No To Addresses]
Subject: %n!! whats up
Attachment Name: Out.bat
The following message contained an attachment type which is not permitted
by the BSOS email system and was removed.
Information about the problem message:
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO: [No To Addresses]
Subject: %n!! whats up
Attachment Name: Out.bat
dition necessary to eliminate bug 59 attachment 37
+ if (baseline > 0) clearInset(bv, baseline, cleared);
}
top_x = int(x);
msg31021/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 01:05:08PM -0600, Michael Polevoy wrote:
> #26 0x4012e507 in __libc_start_main (main=0x80e9200 , argc=1,
> ubp_av=0xb324,
Could this be because of the recently noticed glibc buff overflow bug?
Mate
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 01:05:08PM -0600, Michael Polevoy wrote:
> 4. Place the cursor into the second column
> 5. Using "Tabular Layout", add the column
> 6. Close "Tabular Layout"
> 7. If you're using wheelmouse, scroll the wheel, or simply click on the
> window scrollbar
> 8. In my setting
Sorry guys, when I sent my first mail to you I noticed that my stupid
Netscape inlined attached text file, which is 300+kb long. This e-mail
is exactly the same but attached file iz zipped for your convenience.
Sorry again
=
Hi everyone!
I've found a very reliab
--
André Pönitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? :w
? .array.C.swp
? mathed27.diff
? mathed39.diff
? delim.diff
? bigop.diff
? to_check.diff
? mathed37.diff
? mathed38.diff
? mathed40.diff
? .ChangeLog.swp
? mathed41.diff
Index: ChangeLog
===
And of course I forgot the attachment again...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/mathed/ChangeLog,v
retri
Oops here it comes...
--
André Pönitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? mathedbug2.diff
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/mathed/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> What we need really is not so much NUMERICALLY more classes
Martin> and layouts, but ways to tailor the ones we have in many small
Martin> ways. Like the "geometry" package does already for the margins
Martin> and the Allan Rae
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> As I said in my last e-mail, I don't think we even want to be in
Amir> the mainstream press right now. Give LyX some time to grow. And
Amir> I think open source is becoming a bit over-hyped too. Yes,
Amir> definitely say open source at
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Garst> Any user who can compile a program probably knows what this
Garst> means. To those who don't know what compile means, it is all a
Garst> mystery. Are there binaries available for other systems?
Yes, there are 13 binaries of 0.12.0
> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alejandro> In general I agree with Jean Marc, except:
Martin> 4. Comparison with Word and WP -- hesitant.
>> I am hesitant about the principle, but the paragraph is
>> interesting. You could change the beginning to ``Compa
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 10:40:07AM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> We could target a press release
> and ship it off to all the authors of recent media pieces about open
> source and WordPerfect coming to Linux (lexis-nexis: .ns;open source or
> Wordperfect w/i 5 linux).
This is, potentially, a *r
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 01:33:18PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> Without active leadership, net projects die quickly. Remember the doc
> project? Other than Mike, who (including me!) has written any docs lately?
> And yet I could've sworn the idea was to have the docs set up perfectly for
> v1.0.
>
Okay, here's that letter with some ideas/suggestions.
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 12:14:25AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> LyX -- The Ultimate Document Processor
> --
Bzzzt. Definitely nix the "Ultimate" --- too braggadocio. I also
think calling it "The OpenSou
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Martin> ... more convenient for some of you.
> >
> > I read it, and I like what I saw, beside some comments from Larry with
> > which I happen to agree (see my answer to him). I think this language
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 01:58:26PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 11:32:05AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > 3. Mention Linux and Open Source. (LyX AND LaTeX) Yes. (But remember,
> > LyX is not ONLY for Linux).
I'm a FreeBSD user, and haven't had a Linux partition for tw
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 11:32:05AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> Anyway, I am rather lost now. So how to continue?
>
> 1. Which text to use as basis for further work. Mine, or Larry's?
Yours. Larry's can go into an article an
Larry, you've made some very good points. Most of the folks on the devel
list have been using LyX for a long time, and it's hard for us to look at it
from the perspective of new users, especially ones who don't even know
LaTeX.
That said, I think it's too late to stop 1.0. The LyXers have been sa
In general I agree with Jean Marc, except:
> Martin> 4. Comparison with Word and WP -- hesitant.
>
> I am hesitant about the principle, but the paragraph is
> interesting. You could change the beginning to ``Compared to classical
> Word Processors like WordPerfect or Microsoft Word,...''.
If yo
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 09:35:16PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> What we need really is not so much NUMERICALLY more classes and layouts, but
> ways to tailor the ones we have in many small ways.
You've captured the distinction between new classes and layouts ("Cs/Ls"),
verses what I'd call
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 21:33:31 +0200
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The question most interesting to me is whether there is interest in
> treating the 1.0 release as a major breakpoint, a time to attract (and
> assist) new users for the LyX platform.
>
> A formal effort would certainly require a
The question most interesting to me is whether there is interest in
treating the 1.0 release as a major breakpoint, a time to attract (and
assist) new users for the LyX platform.
A formal effort would certainly require a period of time set aside to
the task of preparing new accompanying materia
> I've asked the list a couple of times whether there was sufficient interest
> in collecting together examples documents, for us to establish an ftp site
> where people could post their efforts. There has never been much of a
> response, which I suggests my views are atypical.
This is a great i
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 12:03:51PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin> 1. Which text to use as basis for further work. Mine, or
> Martin> Larry's?
>
> Yours, of course. I think the latest version is pretty good and was
> rather surprised to see Larry qualify it as 'weak'...
Certainly,
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> ... more convenient for some of you.
I read it, and I like what I saw, beside some comments from Larry with
which I happen to agree (see my answer to him). I think this language
draws a reasonable line between boring technical
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Martin> ... more convenient for some of you.
>> I read it, and I like what I saw, beside some comments from Larry
>> with which I happen to agree (see my answer to him
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> ... more convenient for some of you.
>
> I read it, and I like what I saw, beside some comments from Larry with
> which I happen to agree (see my answer to him). I think this language
Which are those?
> draws a reasonab
... more convenient for some of you.
Martin
Public release of LyX version 1.0.0
===
LyX -- The Ultimate Document Processor
--
LyX is a free document processor providing a structure based approach
to writing documents on your
40 matches
Mail list logo
