Re: New PR interim as attachment

[Alejandro Aguilar Sierra]

In general I agree with Jean Marc, except:

> Martin> 4. Comparison with Word and WP -- hesitant.
> 
> I am hesitant about the principle, but the paragraph is
> interesting. You could change the beginning to ``Compared to classical
> Word Processors like WordPerfect or Microsoft Word,...''.

If you mention those wps you have to give more details to compare, as
Larry suggested. Just describing them as "classical wps" is not fair.
As I said already, that goes better in a review article. IMO don't
mention them at all.

> - add the bit about WP and Word (if it does not take too much precious
>   space).

This supports my opinion against mentioning them. Why to waste valuable
space?  I insist in that the PR should be as short as possible. 

Greets,

Alejandro