On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:58:28AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>>I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
> >>>then please also make the corresponding changes to texparse
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:33:42PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Georg Baum schrieb:
> > Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 19:22 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> >> I am interested in seeing how someone will parse a tex source, where
> >> _every_ macro or environment can be hide after several other macros
> >> or
Georg Baum schrieb:
> Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 19:22 schrieb Herbert Voss:
>> I am interested in seeing how someone will parse a tex source, where
>> _every_ macro or environment can be hide after several other macros
>> or catcode changes ...
>
> Impossible IMHO. It is possible to create a te
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 19:11 schrieb José Matos:
> On Sunday 05 November 2006 4:36 pm, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Tex2lyx is currently several file format versions behind LyX, but I
don't
> > know if it makes sense to work on that. If José is really serious with
> > reimplementing it in python th
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 19:22 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> I am interested in seeing how someone will parse a tex source, where
> _every_ macro or environment can be hide after several other macros
> or catcode changes ...
Impossible IMHO. It is possible to create a tex2lyx that works perfectly
f
Georg Baum schrieb:
> Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 17:25 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
>> Maybe tex2lyx should be updated to take into account the fact that
>> the latex file could be utf8 encoded?
>
> Yes, as I wrote: tex2lyx almost completely ignores encodings.
>
>> If I am not wrong, now LyX c
On Sunday 05 November 2006 4:36 pm, Georg Baum wrote:
> Tex2lyx is currently several file format versions behind LyX, but I don't
> know if it makes sense to work on that. If José is really serious with
> reimplementing it in python then it does not make sense to do anything
> else than simple bugf
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:07:20PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
> > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >
> >> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
> >>
> > I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
> > then pleas
Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
>>
> I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
> then please also make the corresponding changes to texparser.C
only the characters
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 17:51 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 17:25 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> >
> > > Maybe tex2lyx should be updated to take into account the fact that
> > > the latex file could b
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 17:25 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
> > Maybe tex2lyx should be updated to take into account the fact that
> > the latex file could be utf8 encoded?
>
> Yes, as I wrote: tex2lyx almost completely ignores en
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 17:25 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Maybe tex2lyx should be updated to take into account the fact that
> the latex file could be utf8 encoded?
Yes, as I wrote: tex2lyx almost completely ignores encodings.
> If I am not wrong, now LyX could output such encoding.
Yes,
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:58:28PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 16:51 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
> > Then I'll shut up. However, I think that the same change from 256 to 128
> > should also be done in texparser.C, for consistency.
>
> That would introduce an extra if
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 16:51 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Then I'll shut up. However, I think that the same change from 256 to 128
> should also be done in texparser.C, for consistency.
That would introduce an extra if clause.
Georg
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 15:46 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > I am trying to say that, currently, LyX is not correctly tracking
> > catcodes
> > and if we want to improve on that, then we should maintain the 256.
>
> Yes, I unders
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 15:46 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> I am trying to say that, currently, LyX is not correctly tracking
catcodes
> and if we want to improve on that, then we should maintain the 256.
Yes, I understood that, but I don't think that this will be improved in the
near future
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
>
> >>> I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
> >>> then please also make the corresponding changes to texparser.C
> >> only the characters 0,13,32,35-38,65-90,92,94,95,97
Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:58:28AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
> then please also make t
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:58:28AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>> I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
> >>> then please also make the corresponding changes to texp
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 16:00 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Are you saying that it is allowed to create new catcodes in a latex file?
No. You can not create new catcodes, but you can change the catcode of
characters. That is what Enrico did.
Georg
Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
>>> I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
>>> then please also make the corresponding changes to texparser.C
>> only the characters 0,13,32,35-38,65-90,92,94,95,97-123,125-127
>> have a catcode other than 12. All others from the 256 pos
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:58:28AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree,
then please also make the corresponding changes to texparser.C
Abdel is right that a table of 256 is not needed, since we never set the
c
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
>
> >> If you are sure that there is at least one catcode greater than 128 is
> >> classified as something other than catOther, I'll do the change. But
> >> from what I read about TeX catcode since then,
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:58:28AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 00:19 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:27:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> > > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > This is wrong because \catcode works on 8-bit numbers. Plea
Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
>> If you are sure that there is at least one catcode greater than 128 is
>> classified as something other than catOther, I'll do the change. But
>> from what I read about TeX catcode since then, I doubt it.
>
> Maybe you are right as, from what I can see, only the ca
Am Sonntag, 5. November 2006 00:19 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:27:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > This is wrong because \catcode works on 8-bit numbers. Please, change
> > > the 128 to 256.
It was from memory. Obviously I am be
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:27:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:03:16AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Author: younes
> >> Date: Sat Nov 4 12:03:14 2006
> >> New Revision: 15728
> >>
> >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changese
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:03:16AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sat Nov 4 12:03:14 2006
New Revision: 15728
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15728
Log:
Convert to unicode.
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed/MathParser.C
Modified:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:03:16AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Sat Nov 4 12:03:14 2006
> New Revision: 15728
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15728
> Log:
> Convert to unicode.
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed/MathParser.C
>
> Modified: lyx-
29 matches
Mail list logo
