Enrico Forestieri schrieb: >> If you are sure that there is at least one catcode greater than 128 is >> classified as something other than catOther, I'll do the change. But >> from what I read about TeX catcode since then, I doubt it. > > Maybe you are right as, from what I can see, only the catcode of '@' is > ever changed in the LyX sources. However, if proper support for catcodes > will be implemented, we should mimic what TeX does, and TeX can deal > with 256 characters and not 128 as the comment you added implies -- please > change that. Quoting the very beginning of chapter 7 in the TeXbook: > > There are 256 characters that TeX might encounter at each step, > in a file or in a line of text typed directly on your terminal. > These 256 characters are classified into 16 categories numbered > 0 to 15. > > I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree, > then please also make the corresponding changes to texparser.C
only the characters 0,13,32,35-38,65-90,92,94,95,97-123,125-127 have a catcode other than 12. All others from the 256 possible ones have 12. Herbert
