On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:58:28AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > >>> I think that we should leave the 256, but if you and others don't agree, > >>> then please also make the corresponding changes to texparser.C > >> Abdel is right that a table of 256 is not needed, since we never set the > >> catcode of any character above 256 to something else than 256, and we need > >> the if anyway. I have changed the comment accordingly, but if anybody else > >> prefers 256 I have no problem with that either. > > > > I am trying to say that, currently, LyX is not correctly tracking catcodes > > and if we want to improve on that, then we should maintain the 256. > > > > As an example, try importing in LyX the attached valid latex file and you > > will see what I mean. This is a bug, IMO. > > Are you saying that it is allowed to create new catcodes in a latex file?
Try to latex that file and you will have the answer ;-) This is also what \makeatother and \makeatletter do, i.e., change the catcode of '@'. And this is tracked in tex2lyx. -- Enrico
