Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 19.11.2015 um 04:00 schrieb PhilipPirrip :
>
>> I had a similar issue a month or so ago, what helped was a clean cloning
>> of LyX source. Now even that doesn't work, and it's been like that for 2
>> or 3 weeks. It might be due to newest Qt libraries that came with Fedora
rgheck wrote:
>>> Are there command-line ways of doing this, or do we have to link to a
>>> ton of things here?
>>>
>> Yes, just look at xdg-mime which attempts to do precisely that.
>>
>>
> Unfortunately, here on Fedora 11 it just hangs if you type e.g.
> xdg-mime query defaul
rgheck wrote:
> On 12/10/2009 09:43 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda writes:
>>
>>
>>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
I thought about using "xdg-mime query default application/rtf", e.g.,
but this simply hangs on my system. (There are similar reports on
Ubuntu.) Is
For some time, quite a few ttf fonts have been distributed along with lyx in
it's tarball. Now, an added wrinkle is
http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/Qt
which references what seems to be a slightly older separate copy of these
same fonts.
Allow me to humbly request that these fonts (continue) to be
dist
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Been working on some fruitful work on standardizing distro spelling
>> dictionaries (fedora and hunspell), lyx is one of the last users of
>> aspell, so I was wondering if anyone has thought about or (ideally)
>> worked
Been working on some fruitful work on standardizing distro spelling
dictionaries (fedora and hunspell), lyx is one of the last users of aspell,
so I was wondering if anyone has thought about or (ideally) worked on
adding support for other spelling-engines.
If not, any preferences for what to look
Richard Heck wrote:
>
> As said...after upgrading to Fedora 11, I can no longer compile either
> branch or trunk. The error is in boost:
or just build --without-included-boost
-- Rex
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/06/2009 15:01, Rex Dieter a écrit :
>>> to sum it up: i'm completely against that "for majority of users this
>>> works others will fix it themselves."
>>
>> It's fair to say that we agree to disagree
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > are the xdg devs open to natively assimilate some basic mime table?
>>
>> I'd venture that's out of scope for the tool, imo.
>
> which implies we are back to the old year flame with no new arguments and
> pr
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> I'd continue to argue that should not be a prerequisite, as it is
>> preferable
>> (for a vast majority of users) to lyx's current handling of this. A
>> further testiment is how many downstreams are already patching-
list.
>
> According to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8158
> Rex Dieter commited the patch to make use of run-mailcap if available.
> Now the only missing part is that all distributions agree on some process
> to manage the mime types correctly and use run-mailcap or something
> simi
Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> not regress for everyone. imo.
>
> well now the status is we have regression of 1.5.3 to 1.5.2 for some
> users.
some = (small) minority, as well as creating a much better user-experience
for the rest. ok, I'm done (I think I've made my point/opinion as clearly
as I can n
Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> I don't think that it would help a lot to hack parts of the mime
>> detection
>
> DE detection will solve it, but it would uglify the code and could break
> anytime DE change something etc.
>
>> > So the only to viable options I see are
>> > a) remove the xdg-open calls
Rex Dieter wrote:
> fwiw, mimeopen support was added to fedora's xdg-utils, and I had the
> intention of pushing that upstream, but never got round-tuit. My bad.
FYI, xdg-utils: perl-mimeinfo support
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13953
-- Rex
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> I don't know how long it will take to puch some of the mime stuff
> integrated in Debian and Fedora(?) and maybe others upstream.
I plan on finishing this by the end of the week.
As an aside, while I'm working on this anyway, anyone with any other
xdg-utils-related patche
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> what i see know is that simple xdg-open runs just in case you use one of
> the three dm or have the luck of having the distro which patches it
perl-mimeinfo and/or run-mailcap looks like a winner for you then. That's
primarily why I'll be working to get these both integrated
Per Olofsson wrote:
> Well, I submitted the patch over a year ago:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8158
I'll (help) take care of it, looks nice, btw. :)
-- Rex
Per Olofsson wrote:
> rgheck wrote:
>> Per Olofsson wrote:
>>> There is no mention of mimeopen in copy of xdg-open. Could it be another
>>> distro-specific patch?
>>>
>>>
>> Sounds like it.
>
> Seems like a good patch, I should add it to the Debian package. Which
> distribution are you running
Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Yes, but the point is that by using xdg-open, we use whatever the user
>> has set as default, rather than (say) using acroread when they've set
>> kpdf. The
>
> afaik the problem is that there is no unified system how to handle file
> types in linux. xdg-open is just script
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Timothy Reaves wrote:
>
>>> There are several classes in the preferences, and I'm sure several
>>> 'features' no one will be able to use unless these third-party files are
>>> added. A lot of users that would otherwise use LyX won't; they'll give
>>> it a try, see s
Subject says it all. lyx window outline appears on screen, busy cursor,
hang/crash. I see empteen (literally 100's/1000's) of Qt errors spewed :
...
QWidget::repaint: Recursive repaint detected
...
(I'm testing this on Fedora Core 6).
Not necessarily lyx to blame, but was wondering if anyone had
José Matos wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 4:05:38 pm Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Attached is a first crack at patching lyx-1.5 to prefer using xdg-open
>> (1) to open external files/urls from lyx.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> Should we consider it for all formats or just fo
Attached is a first crack at patching lyx-1.5 to prefer using xdg-open (1)
to open external files/urls from lyx.
Comments?
-- Rex
(1) from xdg-utils http://portland.freedesktop.org/, in particular,
http://portland.freedesktop.org/xdg-utils-1.0/xdg-open.html
--- lyx-1.5.0beta1/lib/configure.py.xd
Rex Dieter wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
>> The code is improving (slowly) but we don't yet have a target date for
>> 1.5.0.
> OK, your opinion whether we should try to get lyx-1.5.0(beta
> or not) into Fedora 7:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/7
>
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2007 5:41:26 pm Rex Dieter wrote:
>> José Matos wrote:
>> > Public release of LyX version 1.5.0 (beta 1)
>> > ===
>> >
>> > We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.5.0 (bet
José Matos wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 1.5.0 (beta 1)
> ===
>
> We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.5.0 (beta 1).
Are target release date for 1.5.0 (final)?
-- Rex
Shu Li wrote:
> I don't know if that's the problem of QT4 or Lyx
It's QT4
-- Rex
Is there any inkling of a target date for a lyx-1.5.x release?
http://www.lyx.org/devel/roadmap.php
doesn't mention it yet.
Or is it too far tell atm?
I ask mainly to gauge whether to consider the possibility of including it in
Fedora 7 (due in April).
-- Rex
John Levon wrote:
>
> Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/qm2ts from install of
> qt4-devel-4.1.4-11.fc4.2 conflicts with file from package
> qt-devel-3.3.4-15.5
Oops, to be fixed in qt4-4.1.5-2 real soon.
-- Rex
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> In order to build the qt4 front-end, you should either define QT4DIR on
> the command line before configure, or use the --with-qt4-dir switch. I
> haven't checked John's patch, but I hope it makes this unnecessary.
Doesn't lyx use pkg-config to determine qt4 config'ness?
Georg Baum wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Georg Baum wrote:
>>> Slightly bigger patch.
>>
>> Why
>> +StartupNotify=false
>
> I don't know. I got the files from bugzilla. Should I set this to true, or
> just leave it out?
I'd recommend just leaving it out.
-- Rex
Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. September 2006 15:59 schrieb Neal Becker:
>
>> I know. But my point is that on a system that has kpdf, I think lyx
> should
>> choose it as the default viewer without the user having to do this.
>
> I see it slightly different: LyX should use kpdf in a KDE en
Georg Baum wrote:
> Slightly bigger patch.
Why
+StartupNotify=false
?
-- Rex
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 15:11, Rex Dieter wrote:
Can you try out the -O0 binary and see if it helps?
The problem remains.
The easier way to trigger it is to load the User Guide, then go
Navigate->List of Figure->... any figure.
It crashes with
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 14:48, Rex Dieter wrote:
Yeah it does, IMO, it points to a (likely) compiler bug or a very
obscure coding error exposed only by gcc-4.1.x's optmizations.
Nevertheless I had to turn graphics display off to be able to do some wo
Neal Becker wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
I was afraid of that. What about compile with -O0?
OK, wanna try it out?
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/lyx/
Let me know if this helps.
Acutally, since I suggested this I've realized tha
Neal Becker wrote:
I was afraid of that. What about compile with -O0?
OK, wanna try it out?
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/lyx/
Let me know if this helps.
-- Rex
Rex Dieter wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is anyone currently (or will soon) looking at lyx-1.4.0 crashes
| (fc5/gcc-4-1):
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2376
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2414
| |
Neal Becker wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is anyone currently (or will soon) looking at lyx-1.4.0 crashes
| (fc5/gcc-4-1):
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2376
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2414
|
| I need to know if
Is anyone currently (or will soon) looking at lyx-1.4.0 crashes
(fc5/gcc-4-1):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2376
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2414
I need to know if a fix is on the horizon or not.
-- Rex
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>>>> "Rex" == Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rex> Neal Becker wrote:
>>> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>>>> On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
>>>>> https://
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Rex" == Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rex> And here it is (sorry for not mentioning it here/upstream
Rex> earlier). Should be pretty self-explanatory.
Rex> In particular, adds usage for htmlview, evince, gsview...
Rex> re-ar
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:33:28AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
The latter is not possible, because x64 requires
--with-qt-includes=/usr/lib64/qt3/include
--with-qt-libraries=/usr/lib64/qt3/lib64
Georg Baum wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
The latter is not possible, because x64 requires
--with-qt-includes=/usr/lib64/qt3/include
--with-qt-libraries=/usr/lib64/qt3/lib64.
These shouldn't be necessary, provided that your linux/os vendor/distro
properly defines QTDIR,
Georg Baum wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So you did some modifications... Would it be better to host just the
spec files, or is it possible to have just one src.rpm (per
frontend?)?
The latter is not possible, because x64 requires
--with-qt-includes=/usr/lib64/qt3/include
--with-qt-lib
EUGENE MURPHY wrote:
Using the AMS document classes, a file including the "Current address"
and "Dedication" layouts causes a Latex error due to a double
declaration of
\newcommand{\lyxaddress}[1]{
\par {\raggedright #1
\vspace{1.4em}
\noindent\par}
}
This arises because the file amsdefs.inc
Neal Becker wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:18, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Turns out the existing builds (lyx <= 1.4.0-3) were still using
>>> -fexceptions in the compiler flags, so we'll rebuild with that fixed to
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 09 March 2006 17:47, Neal Becker wrote:
| > I tried 1st to compile lyx-1.4.0 using --without-included-boost, since I
| > have boost-1.33.0 already installed. Before long I hit an error. Anyone
| > have patches?
W
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 09 March 2006 15:22, Rex Dieter wrote:
Pretty sure it's not a x86_64 thing, but something particular to
fc5(gcc-4.1?) as lyx configured the same way, but built/run on my
rhel4/x86_64 fc4/i386 boxes runs like a champ.
Yesterday while doing so
Neal Becker wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
If anyone is curious, the report above includes a backtrace, with many
boost references:
call_notification (this=0x7fe1ee40, [EMAIL P
Rex Dieter wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:42, Bo Peng wrote:
I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to
be working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just
doing something wrong?
Please try the attached layo
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:42, Bo Peng wrote:
I have a beamer.layout that works for lyx 1.3, but it doesn't appear to
be working with 1.4. Do I need an updated beamer.layout or am I just
doing something wrong?
Please try the attached layout file. I remember that I did s
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Nope, that's why I knew about the problem due to build failures I saw
| on fc4/gcc-4.0.2
Hmm... so why doesn't I see the same errors?
I don't now either with the lyx-1.4.0 (release candidate). yay.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Rex Dieter wrote:
| > Looks familiar. That's most likely a gcc-4.0.2 "anonymous namespace"
| > bug (exposed mostly by boost):
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
|
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
This is boot::bind stuff, most probably from the old boost version.
Delete your build directory and recompile everything, then it should
work.
I have done that (deleted everything and done svn up) and it still does no
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have put pre6 in ftp.devel.lyx.org, I'd be happy if you could test
it for brown paper bugs.
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.4.0Ãpre6.tar.bz2
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/lyx-1.4.0Ãpre6.tar.gz
Yay, one that finally builds on gcc-4.1. It now builds
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Saturday 04 March 2006 07:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Tomasz" == Tomasz Łuczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tomasz> But configure command check only for a HTML previewer: mozilla
Tomasz> and netscape, why not firefox and konqueror?
Yes, we should fix this in some la
Rex Dieter wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > At ftp.devel.lyx.org. Please test build and install this. If
| > |
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > At ftp.devel.lyx.org. Please test build and install this. If
| > | > everything now se
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > At ftp.devel.lyx.org. Please test build and install this. If
| > everything now seems ok I will announce it to a broader audience.
|
| Build (still) fails with gcc-4.1:
| http://bugz
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
At ftp.devel.lyx.org. Please test build and install this. If
everything now seems ok I will announce it to a broader audience.
Build (still) fails with gcc-4.1:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278
-- Rex
Rex Dieter wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4...
Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial):
FYI, bugzilla'd so I/we can track it:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278
-- Rex
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jose' Matos wrote:
|
| > FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4...
|
| Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial):
To me this looks like a problem with gcc o
Jose' Matos wrote:
FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4...
Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial):
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I../../src -I./.. -I../../boost -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 20 January 2006 17:48, Rex Dieter wrote:
gcc-4.1.0 (Fedora Core soon-to-be 5), lyx-1.3.7
./configure --with-frontend=qt
build fails (in this case on x86_64, but I don't think that's relavent).
Details appended at end. Full build log avail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello christian,
if remember correctly you are the guy who kindly registered the
lyx-mailinglists to gmane.org. Unfortunately gmane.org doesn't show the
mails since monday. Could you have a look at this?
Hmm... no, I
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Friday 20 January 2006 17:48, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> gcc-4.1.0 (Fedora Core soon-to-be 5), lyx-1.3.7
>> ./configure --with-frontend=qt
>> build fails (in this case on x86_64, but I don't think that's relavent).
>> Any ideas/workaro
gcc-4.1.0 (Fedora Core soon-to-be 5), lyx-1.3.7
./configure --with-frontend=qt
build fails (in this case on x86_64, but I don't think that's relavent).
Details appended at end. Full build log available from:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/3124-lyx-1.3.7-1.fc5/
Georg Baum wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I disagree. If LyX is (directly) using freetype/Xft functions, *it*
should link against freetype/Xft, and not rely upon gtk's (or any other
dependant library's) pkg-config to pull it in.
I did not know that LyX uses xft directly. Since that i
Georg Baum wrote:
Martin Dietz wrote:
Someone please take a look at this: I still can't built the GTk version of
LyX using GTK2.8
I upgraded gtk to 2.8 and see now the include and link problems, too. It
seems that the pkg-config files of gtk 2.8 do not list the dependency on
freetype. Pleas
Martin Dietz wrote:
Someone please take a look at this: I still can't built the GTk version of
LyX using GTK2.8
The references the linker complaints about are clearly there:
3(NXDOMAIN):~/lyx-devel # sudo ldconfig -v | grep -i xft
libXft.so.2 -> libXft.so.2.1.2
libXft.so.1 -> l
Angus Leeming wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
But this will involve me in a lot more work with NSIS getting to grips
with optional installation of components. I'm running out of
LyX-time. I'm also running out of NSIS-enthusiasm.
While having any sort of installer
Angus Leeming wrote:
But this will involve me in a lot more work with NSIS getting to grips
with optional installation of components. I'm running out of
LyX-time. I'm also running out of NSIS-enthusiasm.
While having any sort of installer is better than none at all, I'd
suggest future effort
Kazuki,
Per your post
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/immodule-qt/2004-December/000649.html
Have you had any chance of looking-at/fixing lyx + qt-immodule?
FYI, I've filed a bug report in lyx's bugzilla for this too:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830
I ask because I am the lyx pack
74 matches
Mail list logo
