Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Rex Dieter wrote:
| > Looks familiar. That's most likely a gcc-4.0.2 "anonymous namespace"
| > bug (exposed mostly by boost):
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
|
| Aha! Thanks for pointing to this.
|
| > Apparently to be fixed in gcc-4.0.3 (when released... soon I hope).
So probably redhat/fedora has patched gcc to fix this then.
Nope, that's why I knew about the problem due to build failures I saw on
fc4/gcc-4.0.2
| Hmm. Looks like I'm out of business until then.
Compile your own gcc ... put it in /opt f.ex. I do that all the time.
AFAIK, A newer/fixed gcc-4.0.x isn't available, yet.
-- Rex
