On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:55:32PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > https://snapshot.debian.org/ is another option.
>
> Sorry for my ignorance---it's another option intead of docker, or for the
> archive of packages?
The latter. Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://li
Congratulations and our gratitude for the magnificent team of developers!
Best regards to all.
Murat
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On 5/31/24 14:55, José Matos wrote:
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 12:54 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
One question I had, though, was whether the formatted string changes
in the lyx2lyx code are necessary. Or whether they're safe enough
that I shouldn't worry.
Those changes have been done automat
Public release of LyX version 2.4.0
===
We are proud to announce the release of the new LyX 2.4 series.
After long 6 years of development the 2.4 series has a rich set
of new features compared to the current stable series.
An overview of the new features can be fo
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:38:04PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:22:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Thanks, this is all very helpful. Another question: for "build-dep lyx",
> > the image will need to download packages from a repository. But for old
> > Debian, are th
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 22:38 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> If it's not on mirrors anymore it get's moved to archive.debian.org
> and stays there forever. So you need to change URL for apt.
> https://snapshot.debian.org/ is another option.
>
> Pavel
FWIW the same applies for Fedora after the releases
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:22:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Thanks, this is all very helpful. Another question: for "build-dep lyx", the
> image will need to download packages from a repository. But for old Debian,
> are there still repositories that have the right packages for it?
If it'
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 09:49:01PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:14:38PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I don't know anything about containers but I want to learn. From what I
> > understand of your description, the docker image you started with was a
> > docker image of
On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 12:33 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> This does look powerful. But it's unclear to me whether it's worth
> requiring. I don't have a strong view.
>
> Riki
FWIW worth the choice of 3.10 is not arbitrary on my part.
A new Python parser was introduced in Python 3.9:
A
Can't reproduce in an MWE myself, so maybe I made a mistake somewhere
somehow to remove trailing spaces before the insets.
Will figure out how to add missing spaces with a perl script :-)-O
el
On 31/05/2024 16:44, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:20:16AM +0200, Dr Eberhard Lisse w
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:14:38PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I don't know anything about containers but I want to learn. From what I
> understand of your description, the docker image you started with was a
> docker image of very old debian and, it had nothing to do specifically with
> LyX
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:49:18PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 02:27:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > I have also docker image with the lyx tree which I was using while ago
> > > when bisecting some gcc compatibilty issue heading back into qt4
> > > territory...
> >
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 12:54 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> One question I had, though, was whether the formatted string changes
> in the lyx2lyx code are necessary. Or whether they're safe enough
> that I shouldn't worry.
Those changes have been done automatically through pyupgrade:
https:/
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 02:27:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I have also docker image with the lyx tree which I was using while ago when
> > bisecting some gcc compatibilty issue heading back into qt4 territory...
>
> I'm very interested in the details of this. Did you do the actual bisec
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:16:43PM GMT, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:05:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Thinking ahead, how can I run 2.4.0 in several years when it will be hard
> > to compile it (because of changes to compilers or available Qt versions)?
>
> For the 2.4
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:05:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Thinking ahead, how can I run 2.4.0 in several years when it will be hard to
> compile it (because of changes to compilers or available Qt versions)?
For the 2.4 there was recent flatpack package build. I did not try on my own
bu
On 5/31/24 10:40, José Matos wrote:
This is the code that I intend to submit to remove Python 2 support.
I am also using formatted strings heavily, so in this case I am using
Python 3.8 syntax.
FWIW this patch is a mix between manual changes and using
$ pyupgrade --py38-plus file.py
I am put
Le 31/05/2024 à 18:19, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Le 31/05/2024 à 18:01, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 5/31/24 02:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, dem 30.05.2024 um 21:59 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
I'm happy to keep doing it. If anyone would like to take over,
th
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 12:01 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> It's such a milestone that I thought about suggesting we call it 3.0.
>
> Riki
Naturally I am all for it. :-D
Jokes aside I agree with you.
--
José Abílio
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/ma
Le 31/05/2024 à 18:01, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 5/31/24 02:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, dem 30.05.2024 um 21:59 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
I'm happy to keep doing it. If anyone would like to take over,
though, I'd be happy to pass the baton.
Excellent. You a
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 12:05 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I'm guessing the answer has to do with containers?
>
> Scott
I have also thought about this a lot (because of the file format and to
have the original lyx to generate it) and my conclusion is similar to
yours.
Apologies for not adding f
Occassionally I see someone (maybe Enrico or JMarc?) mention they checked
something on a very old version of LyX to see if some behavior is how it's
always been. How do you do that? Does that version fun on your current
operating system? Do you have a virtual machine with an old version of your
On 5/31/24 02:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, dem 30.05.2024 um 21:59 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
I'm happy to keep doing it. If anyone would like to take over,
though, I'd be happy to pass the baton.
Excellent. You are doing an outstanding job.
And congrats to the releas
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:58:45AM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 30.05.2024 um 21:59 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
> Heck:
> > I'm happy to keep doing it. If anyone would like to take over,
> > though, I'd be happy to pass the baton.
>
> Excellent. You are doing an outstandi
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:20:16AM +0200, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Can someone try to reproduce?
Can't reproduce. Perhaps you could share MWE?
Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:31:39PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> PS: if I can get constexpr to work, I will probably ask for C++14 so that we
> can change things like
> static docstring foo = from_ascii("foo");
That means gcc >= 5 (or >=6.1 if we want to presume it's default).
Given
Le 31/05/2024 à 13:19, José Matos a écrit :
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 11:47 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Another important distinction to make here is in these arguments are if
the issues are related to the users or to the developers?
For my part, I am stuck at work with Ubuntu 20.04 and python 3.8.
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:19:53PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> It is important to distinguish in this conversation two aspects of LTS:
>
> * servers;
> * desktop computers.
>
> Or else with the last round of supports we will feel bounded to support
> +15 year distributions. :-(
Right, we don't ha
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 11:47 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:51:31AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
>
>
> By *old* LTS I meant something like 16.04/18.04.
>
> > In October of 2026 Python 3.10 will no longer be supported even in
> > terms of security releases:
>
> Sure, but LTS d
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:51:31AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 00:02 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > The research which should be done is to pair aprox. versions
> > of Qt, gcc & python in some still alive oold LTS ubuntu/redhat + 2.5
> > years.
> > It does not make sense to inve
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 00:41 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I updated some dev stats for 2.4 series (
> https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Statistics )
> and when looking on the obviously most important indicator, oh boy,
> we are getting old and grumpy :) Our all-time star Jose dropped below
> 0.5 emoticons p
On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 19:10 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I'd suggest AM_PATH_PYTHON now that we do not have 2 versions
> anymore.
> https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Python.html
Does that means that the code can be simplified like this?
# Find a suitable python interp
On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 17:48 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I've uploaded everything to the FTP server and will now wait the
> usual
> 24 hours or so for the mirrors to sync. Official release will be done
> some time tomorrow, but those who are impatient can find the tarballs
> and binaries
33 matches
Mail list logo
