Am Donnerstag 27 Februar 2014, 12:29:36 schrieb stefano franchi:
> - Bibliography support with suitable styles is a must. This feature is as
> crucial to someone working in the Humanities, as math support is for
> someone working in the sciences. With the difference that scientists can
> often avo
Am 27.02.2014 03:19, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
GPL statement missing. P
I know and I already contacted him yesterday to send us a mail.
regards Uwe
Am 21.02.2014 21:55, schrieb Georg Baum:
-- Documentation:
Uwe updated it a lot. Is this finished, or are any updates still missing?
There is still some work to do.
I guess I will need at least 2 more weeks and I guess I will uncover further
bugs.
regards Uwe
Hi Georg,
here are some comments/answers on your questions:
On 27 Feb 2014, at 22:36 , Georg Baum wrote:
> Benjamin Piwowarski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX
>> on OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes: - QT5 is required (as
Do you mean a native LyX file format which would be the primary format, or
an auxiliary format for interfacing with external tools?
I mean xml as primary format.
The native file
format would need to be non-static and would need format changes as LyX
develops (so would face similar problems to
Benjamin Piwowarski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX
> on OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes: - QT5 is required (as
> discussed on the mailing list) - libc++ (instead of libstdc++) is used by
> default systemwide
>
> So here are som
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 01:29 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd like to hear other people's opinions on this. Here is what I think:
>>
>> - Bibliography support with suitable styles is a must. This feature is as
>> crucial to someone work
Richard Heck wrote:
> Some of this stuff will have to be exported as comments that we can
> reparse on import. I believe that is already done with some math stuff
> in TeX export.
Really? Do you have an example? I always thought LyX math is 100% equivalent
to LaTeX math (with the exception of ma
stefano franchi wrote:
> The mentioned fixes are fixes to tex2lyx?
No, the math parser in LyX (2.1 of course). tex2lyx did not need any fixes
regarding the math.
Georg
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> As I've followed the pandoc conversation, I've been concerned about the
> introduction of another dependency. If the import/export tools can be
> kept to LyX and some processing script, that seems easier to maintain
> than a complex chain of to
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 11:27 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
>>
>> I´m a LyX enthusiast and I can see how great this software is because
>> I have used it for 5 years by now. I´ve always asked in this list for
>> a static target lyx format that should be an intrinsic xml format,
>> which
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM, stefano franchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 02/27/2014 03:47 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/27/2014 01:29 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>
> I'd l
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 03:47 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/27/2014 01:29 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
I'd like to hear other people's opinions on this. Here is what I think:
On 02/27/2014 03:47 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/27/2014 01:29 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
I'd like to hear other people's opinions on this. Here is what I think:
- Bibliography support with suitable styles is a must. This feature is as
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> We still need to decide what
>> part of math should be supported for the round trip, but for this decision
>> you can assume that all amsmath commands work in LyX (if not I'll fix
>> them), and only concentrate on what is
Georg Baum wrote:
> We still need to decide what
> part of math should be supported for the round trip, but for this decision
> you can assume that all amsmath commands work in LyX (if not I'll fix
> them), and only concentrate on what is problematic in docx/odt and what is
> needed.
Proof: With
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 01:29 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to hear other people's opinions on this. Here is what I think:
>>
>> - Bibliography support with suitable styles is a must. This feature is as
>> crucial to someone working in the H
On 02/27/2014 01:29 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
I'd like to hear other people's opinions on this. Here is what I think:
- Bibliography support with suitable styles is a must. This feature is
as crucial to someone working in the Humanities, as math support is
for someone working in the scien
On 02/27/2014 11:23 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they are converters from
Latex,i feel we should only consider them as secondary options.
I bel
On 02/27/2014 11:08 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they are converters from
Latex,i feel we should only consider them as secondary options.
I bel
On 02/27/2014 01:47 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Rainer M Krug wrote:
I assume that in LyX, there is an API which could be used to convert
*independent* from the file format?
The closest to this are probably the different writing methods of each
individual inset, e.g. Inset::latex(), Inset::xhtml() e
On 02/27/2014 11:38 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
The downside to any python-based approach, though, is that the LyX format is
a moving target. The script would need to be updated with every syntax
change.
Or could just rely on lyx2lyx.
Yes
On 02/27/2014 11:27 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
The downside to any python-based approach, though, is that the LyX
format is
a moving target. The script would need to be updated with every syntax
change.
I assume this problem would persist with a pandoc approach, isn't it?
The Lyx reader mod
Dear Developers,
I've been following this conversation from the shadows, but I had one
thought that they be relevant.
I think everyone agrees that we want to avoid reimplementing the
internal logic of a LyX document. While thinking about what might be
the best way to implement a converter, it
The downside to any python-based approach, though, is that the LyX format
is
a moving target. The script would need to be updated with every syntax
change.
I assume this problem would persist with a pandoc approach, isn't it?
The Lyx reader module would still be format-dependent, unless we go
Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Richard Heck writes:
>
>> The downside to any python-based approach, though, is that the LyX
>> format is a moving target. The script would need to be updated with
>> every syntax change.
Not necessarily - one could use lyx2lyx to convert to a fixed format.
However, the
Hi,
While I was trying to update a patch for LyX, I had troubles compiling LYX on
OS X 10.9 introduces quite some changes:
- QT5 is required (as discussed on the mailing list)
- libc++ (instead of libstdc++) is used by default systemwide
So here are some patches for compiling LyX on OS X 10.9 th
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Prannoy Pilligundla <
prannoy.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ᐧ
>
> stefano franchi wrote:
>>
>> > Well, pandoc handles LaTex already (although not very successfully in
>> > my tests. Management of citation, for instance leaves a lot to be
>> > desired), so all it's mis
Am Donnerstag 27 Februar 2014, 05:00:43 schrieb Mitul Modi:
> I have read IDEA page for GSOC 2014 and I am interested to contribute
> to project : " Implement 3-box drawing of insets". Since it is
> mentioned that C++ and Qt are prerequisites I am looking forward to
> work on this project. If someo
stefano franchi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Georg Baum
> wrote:
>>
>> I'd use the AMS math test document testmath.tex, this one does not
>> contain too much fancy text stuff. I just fixed some obvious bugs in the
>> LyX math parser.
>
> testmath.tex looks very very complicated to m
Thank you sir for your quick reply.
These links will be really helpful to get started.
I will go through tutorials and try to use LyX as end user and also
try to understand structure of LyX code base.
I will try to solve few bugs and will reply you when I will be ready
to go ahead.
regards,
Mitul
ᐧ
stefano franchi wrote:
>
> > Well, pandoc handles LaTex already (although not very successfully in
> > my tests. Management of citation, for instance leaves a lot to be
> > desired), so all it's missing is a docx "reader" to make the
> > back-conversion possible.
> >
> > That is, I understand pa
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, stefano franchi
> wrote:
>
>> Correction after morning coffee:
>>
>> The needed modules would be:
>>
>> 1. a docx|odt reader module
>> 2. (possibly) a LyX reader module
>>
>> No writer module would be nee
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, stefano franchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:23 AM, stefano franchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they a
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, stefano franchi
wrote:
> Correction after morning coffee:
>
> The needed modules would be:
>
> 1. a docx|odt reader module
> 2. (possibly) a LyX reader module
>
> No writer module would be needed, as pandoc has an extensive collection
> already
>
> From Pandoc's
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:23 AM, stefano franchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they are converters from
>>> Latex,i feel we should only consider them as
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> The downside to any python-based approach, though, is that the LyX format is
> a moving target. The script would need to be updated with every syntax
> change.
Or could just rely on lyx2lyx.
Scott
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
>>
>>
>> I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they are converters from
>> Latex,i feel we should only consider them as secondary options.
>
>
> I believe pandoc is pretty modular. One
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> I assume that in LyX, there is an API which could be used to convert
> *independent* from
> the file format? I don't assume they are exposed outside LyX so that
> they can be accessed from e.g. python?
I don't thinks that's the case. Tha
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
>>
>>
>> I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they are converters from
>> Latex,i feel we should only consider them as secondary options.
>
>
> I believe pandoc is pretty modular. One
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Wilfried wrote:
> Wilfried wrote:
>
>> Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>> > stefano franchi wrote:
>> >
>> AOO and LO help contain a comprehensive list of the formula sytax:
>> in Help - Formulas - General Information - Math Features
>> there is a hyperlink pointing to the r
Hi Mitul,
Welcome to LyX!
It's great to hear you're interested in participating in GSOC 2014
with us. First of all, are you familiar with LyX itself as a user? If
not, I would recommend start using it, and perhaps going quickly
through the tutorial. That will give you an idea of its general
str
Richard Heck writes:
> On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
>>
>> I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they are converters
>> from Latex,i feel we should only consider them as secondary options.
>
> I believe pandoc is pretty modular. One would only need to add LyX to
> the
On 02/27/2014 03:44 AM, Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
I also had a look at pandoc and tex4ht but as they are converters from
Latex,i feel we should only consider them as secondary options.
I believe pandoc is pretty modular. One would only need to add LyX to
the list of formats that it handles
Am 26.02.2014 um 22:11 schrieb Georg Baum :
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> On 02/26/2014 08:54 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>>> 2014-02-26 14:12 GMT+01:00 Stephan Witt:
>>>
>>>I don't have a Mac OS X 10.9 retail version.
>>>
>>>
>>> Given the importance of this task and the effort you invest
Wilfried wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > stefano franchi wrote:
> >
> > > Also, I had a quick look at the equation editor for LibreOffice (the
> > > LO's Math component accessible from Insert>>Object>>Formula). It seems
> > > incredibly primitive. But perhaps it's just the interface that gives
Georg Baum wrote:
> stefano franchi wrote:
>
> > Also, I had a quick look at the equation editor for LibreOffice (the
> > LO's Math component accessible from Insert>>Object>>Formula). It seems
> > incredibly primitive. But perhaps it's just the interface that gives
> > that impression. Before I s
Prannoy Pilligundla writes:
> I have been following the discussion going on in this thread and have been
> exploring Lyx at the same time.I understood how to integrate python scripts
> into the editor and all but i have a some queries regarding the round trip
> conversion
>
> Since we have someth
I have been following the discussion going on in this thread and have been
exploring Lyx at the same time.I understood how to integrate python scripts
into the editor and all but i have a some queries regarding the round trip
conversion
Since we have something like eLyxer which parses the Lyx form
49 matches
Mail list logo
