On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 02/27/2014 01:29 PM, stefano franchi wrote: >> >> I'd like to hear other people's opinions on this. Here is what I think: >> >> - Bibliography support with suitable styles is a must. This feature is as >> crucial to someone working in the Humanities, as math support is for someone >> working in the sciences. With the difference that scientists can often avoid >> conversion to Word, while Humanists just can't. > > > Perhaps it would help to distinguish two projects: (i) Round-trip, for > collaboration; (ii) Export, for sending to a publisher, or whatever. If we > don't want to lose data, then we presumably have to save bibliographic info > as metadata we can reread on import. But if we're only exporting, then we > can either use ODT's bibliography support, e.g., or do the kind of thing we > do with XHTML.
Richard, how does the XHTML export deal with bibliographic references currently? Am I correct that it does not support bst styles at all? At least I could see no differences with a simple document using bibtex+natbib and switching between plainnat and humannat. S. -- __________________________________________________ Stefano Franchi Associate Research Professor Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125 Texas A&M University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421 College Station, Texas, USA stef...@tamu.edu http://stefano.cleinias.org
