stefano franchi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Georg Baum > <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: >> >> I'd use the AMS math test document testmath.tex, this one does not >> contain too much fancy text stuff. I just fixed some obvious bugs in the >> LyX math parser. > > testmath.tex looks very very complicated to me. Are we sure we want to > set the bar that high?
I don't mean that all of testmath.tex needs to be supported. I suggested it as an alternative to amsldoc and the short math guide if one wants a comprehensive test of mathematical equations. We still need to decide what part of math should be supported for the round trip, but for this decision you can assume that all amsmath commands work in LyX (if not I'll fix them), and only concentrate on what is problematic in docx/odt and what is needed. > And do you get it to compile in LyX? Removing all the /verbatim > environments, dissolving the Ert insets that those environment contain > and manually changing the font? I did not try yet. I imported it, and looked at the result (and the errors it produces), and this made me confident that I can fix the math parser without much work so that all mathematical formulas work. I did not look at the text (and I don't think that the text in this document is relevant at all), but if the mathematical formulas are correctly parsed, and possible errors in the text are fixed, then the result will be compilable. Georg
