On 19/10/2011 11:31 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Making all in po
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/stefano/builds/lyx-2-svn/lyx-devel/po'
make lyx-2-svn.pot-update
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/stefano/builds/lyx-2-svn/lyx-devel/po'
sed -e '/^#/d' remove-potcdate.sin> t-remove-potcdate.sed
On 20/10/2011 12:14 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bj?nnes) writes:
This second bundle is _really_ close to what I think could be used as a
starting point for a git lyx repo. One thing missing is pruning of empty
c
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 08/10/11 09:30, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes a écrit :
>>> | What happens with Trac integration ? We used to refer to commits
>>> | from the wiki, from other commits, from tickets, in terms of revision
>>> | number.
>>>
>>> That is a good reason to k
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bj?nnes) writes:
>> This second bundle is _really_ close to what I think could be used as a
>> starting point for a git lyx repo. One thing missing is pruning of empty
>> commits, and fixing up the author names tha
On 19/10/2011 11:31 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
1. I upated to r39890, and now configure finds the correct python2 executable:
checking for a Python interpreter with version>= 2.4.0... python2
checking for python2... /usr/bin/python2
checking for python2 version... 2.7
checking for python2 plat
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
>> All good.
>>
>> 2.0.0
>> 2.0.0alpha1
>> 2.0.0alpha2
>> 2.0.0alpha3
>> 2.0.0alpha4
>> 2.0.0alpha5 - tag missing in svn repo. added
>
| this is perhaps missing because its the famous point where i succeeded to
| remove whole svn trunk (r34985
On 10/19/2011 05:31 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
> 1. I upated to r39890, and now configure finds the correct python2
> executable:
>
>
> checking for a Python interpreter with version >= 2.4.0... python2
> checking for python2... /usr/bin/python2
> checking for python2 version... 2.7
> checking fo
On 10/19/2011 04:58 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 19/10/2011 9:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> We should definitely fix these sorts of silly print issues.
>>
>
> It won't be only print issues, python 2 and 3 are a lot uncommon. You
> can put a google summer of code student on the porting task.
>
I act
On 10/19/2011 04:50 PM, jri...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: jrioux
> Date: Wed Oct 19 22:50:58 2011
> New Revision: 39890
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/39890
>
> Log:
> Provide our own patched AM_PYTHON_CHECK_VERSION that requires python <3.0
>
This should probably go also to branch once sui
jri...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: jrioux
> Date: Wed Oct 19 22:50:41 2011
> New Revision: 39889
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/39889
>
> Log:
> We nowadays require python >=2.4
this should be kept in sync with UPGRADING file...
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/configure.ac
>
> Modifi
1. I upated to r39890, and now configure finds the correct python2 executable:
checking for a Python interpreter with version >= 2.4.0... python2
checking for python2... /usr/bin/python2
checking for python2 version... 2.7
checking for python2 platform... linux2
checking for python2 script direc
On 19/10/2011 9:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
We should definitely fix these sorts of silly print issues.
It won't be only print issues, python 2 and 3 are a lot uncommon. You
can put a google summer of code student on the porting task.
Here's a silly idea: Create a new user and make ~/bin/py
Hello
Two notes: 'lyx-devel' is not the appropriate forum for usage
questions; you would better address them to 'lyx-users'. However, both
these lists are in English. If you want to write in French, do so on
'lyx-fr' [1].
[1] http://www.lyx.org/MailingLists#toc11
2011/10/19 jlg :
> Bonsoir
>
> j
Il 19/10/2011 15:06, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
+ LFUN_BUFFER_EXPORT_AS, // tommaso 20111006
just a glitch but unless this is intended for branch backporting its good
to keep RELEASE-NOTES in sync...
Done in r39888.
T.
On 10/19/2011 12:40 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
So my problem is getting worse. Compilation of the svn tree fails even
earlier, and because of the same python issue, I guess (see below).
It seems I cannot remove python 3, since the Arch package management
system depends on it. Do I have any alter
Bonsoir
je veux obtenir ceci par section (donc redémarrage de la numérotation à
chaque nouvelle section dans le format simple Exercice i et non Exercice
i.j )
soit
Exercice 1 :mknmlnl
knkn
Exercice 2 :moihjmnhd
kjblkb
--
Exercice 1 : solution de l'énoncé de l'Exercice 2
E
Il 19/10/2011 04:02, Richard Heck ha scritto:
This fixes the assertion,
yes, I thought this was priority #1 for stability reasons, that's why I
committed without discussing on the list.
but isn't the layout combo still out of sync with the Advanced F&R
dialog's work area? In the test case,
So my problem is getting worse. Compilation of the svn tree fails even
earlier, and because of the same python issue, I guess (see below).
It seems I cannot remove python 3, since the Arch package management
system depends on it. Do I have any alternatives? Is there anyone
building lyx on the Arch
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bj?nnes) writes:
> This second bundle is _really_ close to what I think could be used as a
> starting point for a git lyx repo. One thing missing is pruning of empty
> commits, and fixing up the author names that were noted as lacking last
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/10/11 09:30, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes a écrit :
>> | What happens with Trac integration ? We used to refer to commits
>> | from the wiki, from other commits, from tickets, in terms of revision
>> | number.
>>
>> That is a good reason to keep revision numbers in the gi
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> All good.
>
> 2.0.0
> 2.0.0alpha1
> 2.0.0alpha2
> 2.0.0alpha3
> 2.0.0alpha4
> 2.0.0alpha5 - tag missing in svn repo. added
this is perhaps missing because its the famous point where i succeeded to
remove whole svn trunk (r34985). it was resurrected by svn copy in r
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 16-10-2011 16:50, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
>> Am 16.10.2011 14:17, schrieb Georg Baum:
>>
>>> some time ago we discussed the removal of scons, and somebody mentioned
>>> that
>>> you use it for the installer. Could you please make a list of features
>>> that
>>> you n
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 11-10-2011 19:11, Julien Rioux schreef:
>> On 07/10/2011 7:24 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> Yes, it was probably wrong to introduce LFUNs that need newlines. And
>>> maybe we should allow escaping or something. Anyway, I've been
>>> instructing people in t
tomm...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: tommaso
> Date: Thu Oct 6 15:47:42 2011
> New Revision: 39805
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/39805
> + LFUN_BUFFER_EXPORT_AS, // tommaso 20111006
just a glitch but unless this is intended for branch backporting its good
to keep RELEASE-NOTE
24 matches
Mail list logo
