Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 08/10/11 09:30, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes a écrit : >>> | What happens with Trac integration ? We used to refer to commits >>> | from the wiki, from other commits, from tickets, in terms of revision >>> | number. >>> >>> That is a good reason to keep revision numbers in the git commits, but >>> of course after a svn2git conversion things will be a bit more >>> cumbersome for older stuff. Trac has git support, so new tickets (but >>> now using git sha as identifiers) will be in the same system as before. >> >> If we are not able to find a commit from its svn revision, we could keep >> the reference in commits maybe with a less ugly wording. > | +1. "@" is not nice character and must be escaped in some scenarios. | i would suggest to use rXXXX string in commit message. more about this | in a separate thread.
I really do not want to rewrite that. (Takes a lot of time and how to be done "flag-day" style.) In what cases would the git-svn created urls be a problem. | <silly idea> | pruning most of the strings remerge commits in trunk could substantially | decrease the size of the repo, and has nice side effect for searching | in history via git log -p. would it make sense to play with it? | </silly idea> I do not get what you mean at all? Are you talking about po-files? I do not think we should do that either. -- Lgb
