No advance after removing the ~/.lyx folder.
2011/4/20 LyX Ticket Tracker
> #7474: "False" entries in textclass.lst
>
> ---+
> Reporter: grangouze | Owner: lasgouttes
> Type: defect | Status: new
>
Yes!
2011/4/20 LyX Ticket Tracker
> #7474: "False" entries in textclass.lst
>
> ---+
> Reporter: grangouze | Owner: lasgouttes
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: high | Milestone:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:45 AM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>> I thought gdb only works for gcc compiled binaries (not e.g. MSVC).
>> Are we using gcc to compile the Windows binaries?
>>
> I'm not familiar with these details. I would guess
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:45 AM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> I thought gdb only works for gcc compiled binaries (not e.g. MSVC).
> Are we using gcc to compile the Windows binaries?
>
I'm not familiar with these details. I would guess LyX is built with
MSVC. How would one get to debug these binari
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:01 AM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>> Do you have a backtrace? (If not you could perhaps make a habit of
>> running LyX through a debugger so you can backtrace when it crashes.)
>>
> You would need to install gdb (w
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:01 AM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> Do you have a backtrace? (If not you could perhaps make a habit of
> running LyX through a debugger so you can backtrace when it crashes.)
>
You would need to install gdb (which is available for Win) and make a
habit of starting LyX via
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
>> Well that just proves Pavel's point that the bug won't be fixed unless you
>> report it!
> C'mon, it is not that easy to report a bug. ;\
>> As for the lack of reports for windows - people are generally shy in
>> this regard, especially non
> Well that just proves Pavel's point that the bug won't be fixed unless you
report it!
C'mon, it is not that easy to report a bug. ;\
> As for the lack of reports for windows - people are generally shy in
> this regard, especially non-programmers.
You're absolutely right.
While using LyX I even
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:29:30 +0200
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> [...]
> also the "interesting" bugs are those which starts with "using
> official installer". yes, i know, only rc2 is available now...
I've just remembered something.
Last time I've tried the official installer (I think it was for
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 23:20:31 -0300
Diego Queiroz wrote:
> Well.
> Let's not start the endless discussion of "what's the better OS",
> right? :-) However, of course there will be volunteers interested in
> Windows if you decide to move to Linux. I'm one of them.
Just to be clear: even after fu
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> $ svn up
> Alla revisione 38459.
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep 'libqt.*-dev'
> ii libqt4-dev 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4.3
> ii libqt4-opengl-dev 4:4.7.0-0ubuntu4.3
> ii libqtwebkit-dev 2.0.
Well that just proves Pavel's point that the bug won't be fixed unless you
report it!
What do you mean by the installer being less stable anyway? Do you mean the
version of LyX that gets installed is less stable? Or do you literally mean
that
the installer crashes/installs LyX incorrectly?
I
On Apr 19, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 20/09/2009 15:10, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
>> Just a simple button that creates an empty drawing copying a template
>> from a folder (and opening an external editor on it) seems really the
>> right way to go, it would solve your part
> i dont see another people to report this. so your problems are not going
to
> disappear unless we have a way how to reproduce them or at least have a
> bactrace.
I think you're right.
But I also question myself how much people are really using/testing LyX 2.0
in Windows.
My guess is that only f
Am 20.04.2011 um 16:02 schrieb BH:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:54 AM, BH wrote:
>>> Which Qt version are you using? I want to give it a try...
>>
>> 4.7.2. (I'll try with 4.4.2 in a bit.)
>
> I'm not finding either bug with 4.4.2. And now, switching back, I'm
> not finding the crashing bug with
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:54 AM, BH wrote:
>> Which Qt version are you using? I want to give it a try...
>
> 4.7.2. (I'll try with 4.4.2 in a bit.)
I'm not finding either bug with 4.4.2. And now, switching back, I'm
not finding the crashing bug with 4.7.2 at all, and the "annoying bug"
happens on
Why don't you open a ticket for this issue?
---
Diego Queiroz
2011/4/20 Diego Queiroz
> I don't experience this problem in Windows.
>
> ---
> Diego Queiroz
>
>
>
>
> 2011/4/19 Tommaso Cucinotta
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> if I try to exit LyX via Alt+F4 with unsaved changes, then the question
>> dialog (
I don't experience this problem in Windows.
---
Diego Queiroz
2011/4/19 Tommaso Cucinotta
> Hi,
>
> if I try to exit LyX via Alt+F4 with unsaved changes, then the question
> dialog (save ?) pops up *without focus*, i.e., typing Enter or moving the
> cursor will not help in selecting/pressing
Diego Queiroz wrote:
> But my vote is to wait until LyX is stable in both OS, so we guarantee the
> support for both platforms.
i dont see another people to report this. so your problems are not going to
disappear unless we have a way how to reproduce them or at least have a
bactrace.
also the "i
On 04/19/2011 02:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
next week (~27-8) i plan to make final 2.0.0 tarballs.
OK. LyX 1.6.10 will follow soon after. This means that if you want to get some
fix into branch yet, you should act soon. Once 2.0 is tagged, I will try to
close the 1.6 br
> Which Qt version are you using? I want to give it a try...
4.7.2. (I'll try with 4.4.2 in a bit.)
BH
21 matches
Mail list logo
