Stephen
> There was a version for LaTeX
> http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/info/latex4wp/latex4wp.pdf
>
>
This looks useful, thanks.
Graham
OK, it seems most of us think that the toolbar changes are a bit too
sensitive. Even Joost agrees that there is some post-2.0 code needed.
And I tend to agree that we shouldn't change the UI twice.
On the other hand. I really like the new Libre icons, I would like to
have them as the default.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:33:22PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
> news:20110325162427.gn29...@sirio.sssup.it...
> >Hmmm... the artifacts are now gone, but the toolbars are still
> >unrensposive.
>
> No problems here. Did you try a clean user directory? Perha
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
> news:20110325143448.ge29...@sirio.sssup.it...
> >I don't agree. As you can see, additional icon sets may simply subsitute
> >some icons. If an icon is missing, the one from the default set will
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Why is this post-2.0 stuff. This is not so difficult ?
It's not a matter of difficulty. It's a matter of sane release principles. My
point is that we should respect the release cycles, and a release candidate is
a release candidate.
UI changes might look "trivia
"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message
news:4d8cd11d.8000...@lyx.org...
Why is this post-2.0 stuff. This is not so difficult ?
I think Jurgen's concern is the RC status.
As a final suggestion for 2.0: Maybe the UI file could be linked to an
icon directory (instead of the preferences which
Now having the same item twice (even if one toolbar can be disabled) is
*really* bad UI design. A better idea would be to introduce OptItem for the
toolbar to let the master-buffer-* items disappear if the document in question
is no child.
But this is all post-2.0 stuff.
Why is this post-2.0
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
news:201103251812.22547.sp...@lyx.org...
The whole thing is not for 2.0. Bad luck. People had two years time to
come up
with UI proposals.
Perhaps it's better to postpone all the UI stuff to a future release.
It seems like discussions with a bit of contro
Joost Verburg wrote:
> The alternative is to keep the current ad-hoc design with e.g. thesaurus
> next to paragraphs settings.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm opting for.
> New code will allow for more improvements, however that's definitely is
> not for 2.0.
The whole thing is not for 2.0. Bad l
"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message
news:201103251748.53062.sp...@lyx.org...
Now having the same item twice (even if one toolbar can be disabled) is
*really* bad UI design. A better idea would be to introduce OptItem for
the
toolbar to let the master-buffer-* items disappear if the document i
Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Yep, that did the trick. However, it is going to surprise many people.
> > BTW, why the "View" button appears twice? Even if it is in two different
> > toolbars, they are the default ones.
>
> Because many users don't need the advanced view/update features.
> With the "Vie
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110325143448.ge29...@sirio.sssup.it...
I don't agree. As you can see, additional icon sets may simply subsitute
some icons. If an icon is missing, the one from the default set will be
used. So, there's no maintaining burden as only those icons that don
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110325162427.gn29...@sirio.sssup.it...
Hmmm... the artifacts are now gone, but the toolbars are still
unrensposive.
No problems here. Did you try a clean user directory? Perhaps there's still
some session info left.
Joost
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110325161616.gm29...@sirio.sssup.it...
Yep, that did the trick. However, it is going to surprise many people.
BTW, why the "View" button appears twice? Even if it is in two different
toolbars, they are the default ones.
Because many users don't need
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:16:16PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> > "Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
> > news:20110325142851.gd29...@sirio.sssup.it...
> > >On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> > >>W
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
> news:20110325142851.gd29...@sirio.sssup.it...
> >On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> >>Why did you revert this? What was broken?
> >
> >See attached screen shot. Mor
"Ola Ringdahl" wrote in message
news:4d8c95d6.7080...@cs.umu.se...
There seems to be an error in clean_dvi.py in the windows version of Lyx
2.0 RC1. When trying to produce a dvi output (ctrl-D, dvipdfm or
ps2pdf) Lyx gives an error (see the atached screenshot). Replacing
clean_dvi.py with the o
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110325142851.gd29...@sirio.sssup.it...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
Why did you revert this? What was broken?
See attached screen shot. Moreover, the toolbars where unrensposive and
only through the main menu I coul
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110325144230.gj29...@sirio.sssup.it...
Because it was broken. Apart from artifacts in the upper left corner,
after starting LyX with no document open, the toolbars where not
responding when clicked.
That's probably because your session file contained
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:26:32PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Why did you revert this? What was broken?
> >
> > See attached screen shot. Moreover, the toolbars where unrensposive and
> > only through the main menu I could open a new file.
>
> This is again
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Why did you revert this? What was broken?
>
> See attached screen shot. Moreover, the toolbars where unrensposive and
> only through the main menu I could open a new file.
This is again the case here after r38046. Was the stdtoolbars.inc part of that
commit intention
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I am not familiar with it (I don't even know what you are talking about).
> If you know a better approach, please apply it. Anyway, I took that route
> in order to have an actual icon set name written in the preferences file
> instead of a number. In this way, the order o
On 25/03/2011 9:20 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Could someone with TeXLive 2009 try if the attached patch works (i.e.,
reports that LuaTeX is not usable and does not set it up)?
here's a slightly enhanced patch. This also considers the case where fontspec
is not ins
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:34:42PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> forenr wrote:
> > Author: forenr
> > Date: Fri Mar 25 15:21:28 2011
> > New Revision: 38046
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38046
> >
> > Log:
> > Move to PrefUi the icon set choice and solve problem with translation
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:49:01PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Edwin Leuven" wrote in message
> news:AANLkTi=+t2HRjX4oZCoozDFo760_Mo0uVPZ4j5C_x=k...@mail.gmail.com...
> >i guess only the new toolbar layout is left...
>
> Yes. I did upload the new toolbar (with optional "classic" toolbars
> in
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:54:13PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> "Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
> news:20110324030315.ga29...@sirio.sssup.it...
> >Here is another possible set of icons to be considered.
>
> I just noticed the last minute work on the new "liber" icon set.
> Perhaps we should
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:36:33AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Also, this
>
> + default:
> + rc.icon_set = fromqstr(iconSetCO-
> >currentText().toLower());
> + break;
>
> will break as soon as these strings are translated, or more l
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > These icons (and also the oxygens) are not being installed yet.
>
> I think Stephan solved this issue.
Yes.
Jürgen
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:36:45AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Display is the wrong section. This should go to PrefUI.
OK, done.
--
Enrico
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> for...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: forenr
> > Date: Fri Mar 25 03:21:17 2011
> > New Revision: 38039
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38039
> >
> > Log:
> > Add libreoffice based icons
>
> These icons (and also the oxy
forenr wrote:
> Author: forenr
> Date: Fri Mar 25 15:21:28 2011
> New Revision: 38046
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38046
>
> Log:
> Move to PrefUi the icon set choice and solve problem with translation
> of icon set names.
GuiPrefs.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void
lyx::frontend:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:00:07PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> I also just noticed that you designed a new icon set as well.
> If you're happy with the liber icons as default perhaps we should remove the
> "old" and "oxygen" icons so there's no need for switching code and multiple
> icon sets to
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Why did you revert this? What was broken?
See attached screen shot. Moreover, the toolbars where unrensposive and
only through the main menu I could open a new file.
--
Enrico
<>
Julien Rioux wrote:
> Perhaps we can just check on the file extension
> formats.extension(inc_format).
>
> Call the converter only when it is not ".tex"
OK. If this suits your (i.e., literate's) needs. Go for it.
Jürgen
On 25/03/2011 10:09 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Thanks. But actually won't we need to special case all three of:
pdflatex, lualatex, xelatex?
Yes, bufferFormat() actually does not return the adequate information.
The attached patch will do (although I do not like this sp
Julien Rioux wrote:
> Thanks. But actually won't we need to special case all three of:
> pdflatex, lualatex, xelatex?
Yes, bufferFormat() actually does not return the adequate information.
The attached patch will do (although I do not like this special casing).
Jürgen
Index: src/insets/InsetIn
Am Freitag, 25. März 2011 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> "Kornel" wrote in message
> news:201103250733.23097.kor...@lyx.org...
>
> > Why everything instead of adding only *.R?
> > lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib lyx2lyx *.py .)
> > +lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib scripts *.R .)
> > Kornel
>
> Yes that'
On 25/03/2011 6:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
As of this change, I am bombarded by warnings "Included file xxx was not
exported correctly. Warning: LaTeX export is probably incomplete." when
viewing/updating a master file with children. After I have clicked away
all
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Could someone with TeXLive 2009 try if the attached patch works (i.e.,
> reports that LuaTeX is not usable and does not set it up)?
here's a slightly enhanced patch. This also considers the case where fontspec
is not installed, but the lualatex binary is.
Jürgen
Inde
"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message
news:20110324030315.ga29...@sirio.sssup.it...
Here is another possible set of icons to be considered.
I just noticed the last minute work on the new "liber" icon set.
Perhaps we should delete the "oxygen" and "old" sets so only one style of
icons has to be
"Edwin Leuven" wrote in message
news:AANLkTi=+t2HRjX4oZCoozDFo760_Mo0uVPZ4j5C_x=k...@mail.gmail.com...
i guess only the new toolbar layout is left...
Yes. I did upload the new toolbar (with optional "classic" toolbars in
addition), but Enrico reverted this. I'm not sure why.
Joost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/03/11 13:28, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
>> veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
>>> http://www.poul.org/attivita/conferenze/conferenza-su-lyx/
>>> Maybe Enrico or someone else who speaks Italian can take a look and
>>> tell me if they can be intere
"Kornel" wrote in message
news:201103250733.23097.kor...@lyx.org...
Why everything instead of adding only *.R?
lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib lyx2lyx *.py .)
+lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib scripts *.R .)
Kornel
Yes that's also fine.
Joost
> veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote:
> > http://www.poul.org/attivita/conferenze/conferenza-su-lyx/
> > Maybe Enrico or someone else who speaks Italian can take a look and
> > tell me if they can be interesting for the Wiki.
>
> Maybe the "core" presentation, not the other one :)
Ahah, sure ;)
Well,
> Right. See this example file and revert r37696 locally. The
> bug appear
> because with hyperref activated, psspecials appear and we send the
> numbered equations snippets to legacy method. The legacy
> method doesn't
> handle them well. Previously, the dvipng method was used on such
> snip
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Yes.
>
> And who is gonna do it? ;-)
Always the one who asks ...
Could someone with TeXLive 2009 try if the attached patch works (i.e., reports
that LuaTeX is not usable and does not set it up)?
Jürgen
Index: lib/configure.py
==
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Modified:
> >lyx-devel/trunk/src/LyXRC.cpp
> >lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiPrefs.cpp
> >lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/ui/PrefDisplayUi.ui
>
> Display is the wrong section. This should go to PrefUI.
Also, this
+ default:
+
Enrico comitted:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38038
great! (now i can use "liber")
i guess only the new toolbar layout is left...
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> As of this change, I am bombarded by warnings "Included file xxx was not
> exported correctly. Warning: LaTeX export is probably incomplete." when
> viewing/updating a master file with children. After I have clicked away
> all the warnings, the view is successful.
>
jrioux wrote:
> Author: jrioux
> Date: Thu Mar 24 16:47:40 2011
> New Revision: 38025
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38025
>
> Log:
> handle 'literate' lyx child documents (lilypond and sweave)
>- don't assume that the exported file extension is .tex
>- use converter tool chain t
Am Freitag, 25. März 2011 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> for...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: forenr
> > Date: Fri Mar 25 03:21:17 2011
> > New Revision: 38039
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38039
> >
> > Log:
> > Add libreoffice based icons
>
> These icons (and also the oxygens) are not
for...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: forenr
> Date: Fri Mar 25 03:21:17 2011
> New Revision: 38039
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38039
>
> Log:
> Add libreoffice based icons
These icons (and also the oxygens) are not being installed yet.
Jürgen
forenr wrote:
> Log:
> Preferences for choosing the icon set to use. It works on the fly, but
> the size of icons may be wrong when switching between sets with different
> normal icon size. One needs to save the preferences, restart LyX and choose
> "Normal-sized icons" from the toolbar menu to hav
Georg Baum wrote:
> Thanks for your explanation. After reading it I think that translating
> 'proposition' with 'Satz' is the best option. Jürgen, may I do that?
Go on. I know nothing of math terminology.
Jürgen
54 matches
Mail list logo
