Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> 1) Is it correct to use a static object? In particular, there are no
>> modifications of the locale in LyX initialization?
>> 2) Would it make sense to have it as a non-static member of the class, or
>> is it expensive to build?
>
> its easy to make it nonstatic member and i
Joost Verburg wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I agree with Edwin personally. I would also agree with
o Justified (Default)
o Left
o Center
o Right
But we can change that later if we reach consensus.
I think default should be an additional option. There may be good
reasons to set the alignme
Richard Heck wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
What happends if the user moves the cursor when the dialog is open,
does it
get updated?
The dialog is presently modal, precisely because there's no reliable
trigger right now to do the update. Making this work involves re-working
the controlle
Mostafa Vahedi wrote:
What is the internal encoding of a LyX file?
UTF8, in any case and whatever encoding is used for LateX. UTF32 (aka
ucs4) is used internally.
Abdel.
Hi!
Once we do the ArabTeX / Arabi separation, the Wiki page will have to be
updated (if you want, I can try to make the changes myself, but I didn't
want to do it without your OK, Uwe):
* the cuaArab.bind file should have for the F12 key: "language
arabic_arabtex" or "language arabic_arabi
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mael> Le 23 juin 07 à 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> As far as I know, it is supposed to output the list in the correct
>> language.
Mael> I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be
Mael> something like '\listof {a
I'm getting this message:
No rule to make target `de/ExternesMaterialQt4.png', needed by `all-am'.
Stop.
I did a distclean and reconfigured, but still doesn't help...
Thanks!
Dov
Oliver Johns
Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:04:50 -0700
Folks,
LyX 1.5.0rc1 is a tremendous improvement. But:
Text entry in the middle of a paragraph is unusably slow. My typing
(not great) gets far ahead of the screen. The screen catches up at
a rate of about one character every 1/2 second. Glacial.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Attached is Dov's latest patch. I added the font encoding stuff and the
fileformat change. It is furthermore needed to load arabtex in the
preamble when the language is arabic_arabtex, I added this to the patch.
Please test.
Thanks for taking care of the lyx2lyx stuff! I adde
Folks,
LyX 1.5.0rc1 is a tremendous improvement. But:
Text entry in the middle of a paragraph is unusably slow. My typing
(not great) gets far ahead of the screen.
The screen catches up at a rate of about one character every 1/2
second. Glacial. Cursor shift using right or left arrows is
Le 23 juin 07 à 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
As far as I know, it is supposed to output the list in the correct
language.
I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be something
like '\listof {algorithm}{\listalgorithmname}'.
Did you install LyX before trying?
I get
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mael> The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated)
Mael> into the output.
Mael> 1. Create a new document 2. Choose a non english language 3.
Mael> Insert a list of algorithms (Insert > List / TOC > List of
Mael> Algori
Bernhard Roider schrieb:
Hello,
there are some problems with math preview (1.5rc1 and earlier):
1. When undoing something in a paragraph then all formulas in this
paragraph are not previewed anymore until i click into the formula and
outside again. Moreover this click into and outside does no
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
It has become sort of a religious issue
lyx has a tendency to put a stupid button, checkbox you name it for
whatever stupid thing that is around. in the end you get a bad,
cluttered ui...
(i this respect i think i compared lyx to a x-mas tree once)
so it has nothi
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
i also think that non-latex users have a reflex to set things explicitly
and will therefore abuse the dialog to set paragraphs to justified even
though it is the default etc.
In that sense maybe the old interface ("Default" checkbox + the rest) was
better? (*ducks*
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio
buttons now
instead of a combobox?
Another reason is that you can see at a glance what the permissible
alignments are. Yet another is that enabling and disabling com
Michael Gerz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QParagraph.cpp
URL:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QParagraph.cpp?rev=18860
==
--- lyx-deve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QParagraph.cpp
URL:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/QParagraph.cpp?rev=18860
==
--- lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/
On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:29:38 Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> What do we celebrate? %^}
Winter/Summer Solstice. :-)
> A/
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:01:41 Mael Hilléreau wrote:
>> > The attached patch solves the problem. Please tell me if it's
>> > sufficient as I'm note sure if things are done in the right way...
>>
>> No feedback on this?
>
> We are on a weekend with celebrations going aroun
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> be the Default for that paragraph. The reason to make this distinction
>> is that it is one thing to say, "Give this paragraph the default
>> alignment, whatever that is" and another to say, "Make this paragraph
>> fully justified, no matter what". The
On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:01:41 Mael Hilléreau wrote:
> > The attached patch solves the problem. Please tell me if it's
> > sufficient as I'm note sure if things are done in the right way...
>
> No feedback on this?
We are on a weekend with celebrations going around so please be patient. :-)
Le 22 juin 07 à 19:21, Mael Hilléreau a écrit :
The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated)
into the output.
1. Create a new document
2. Choose a non english language
3. Insert a list of algorithms (Insert > List / TOC > List of
Algorithms)
4. View the source (View > V
On Saturday 23 June 2007 10:32:07 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> If the room is there, radiobuttons are easier to use than comboboxes.
>
> Andre'
I agree.
--
José Abílio
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:21:03AM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> >Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >>>Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio buttons now
> >>>instead of a combobox?
> >>1 click instead of 2?
> >
> >I'd prefer two clicks over the waste of space.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio
> > > buttons now instead of a combobox?
> >
> > 1 click instead of 2?
>
> I'd prefer two clicks over the waste of space. But I have no stro
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > I've committed this now, with a reference to this discussion.
>
> Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio buttons now
> instead of a combobox?
If the room is there, radiobuttons ar
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio buttons now
instead of a combobox?
1 click instead of 2?
I'd prefer two clicks over the waste of space. But I have no strong opinion on
this.
the current dialog is ugly as hell.
the
Richard Heck wrote:
be the Default for that paragraph. The reason to make this distinction
is that it is one thing to say, "Give this paragraph the default
alignment, whatever that is" and another to say, "Make this paragraph
fully justified, no matter what". The difference will only show up in
c
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio buttons now
> > instead of a combobox?
>
> 1 click instead of 2?
I'd prefer two clicks over the waste of space. But I have no strong opinion on
this.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I've committed this now, with a reference to this discussion.
Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio buttons now
instead of a combobox?
1 click instead of 2?
Richard Heck wrote:
> I've committed this now, with a reference to this discussion.
Could you remind me again about the reason why we use 5 radio buttons now
instead of a combobox?
Jürgen
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> This whole current_layout business smells bad though...
Indeed.
Jürgen
33 matches
Mail list logo
