On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:23:24PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> This seems pretty straightforward: Alignment, line spacing, and such
> can't be set in captions; it leads to invalid LaTeX output. This
> disables it. Will commit unless someone objects.
>
> Richard
I like small patches ;-)
Are c
This seems pretty straightforward: Alignment, line spacing, and such
can't be set in captions; it leads to invalid LaTeX output. This
disables it. Will commit unless someone objects.
Richard
--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Ph
Richard> Here's a guide to the patch, as it's large because of all the
Richard> moving around.
Thanks for the explanations. I won't have much time to comment now, in
particular because I will be in vacation next week and I go to some
meeting tomorrow that requires some preparation.
Enjoy th
> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> Here's a guide to the patch, as it's large because of all the
Richard> moving around.
Thanks for the explanations. I won't have much time to comment now, in
particular because I will be in vacation next week and I go to some
mee
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
I already know this is the case for MikTeX, but I do not think the
same holds for other distributions.
We don't loose anything because currently it also doesn't work with the existing cv.layout so
removing this is in every case an advantage.
regards Uwe
The attached patch addresses some output errors connected with paragraph
parameters as set through the paragraph settings dialog. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg113940.html
for some earlier remarks. Another version of this bug is that if the
user tries to single space (s
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On the other hand, this is on Qt-4.2.3. If you really want, I can
try Qt-4.3, but not today!
Whenever you have time. We are not in a hurry don't worry. Before
1.5.0 is enough ;-)
I tried it, and compilation fails for me. I don't have ti
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I suggest to list what this cleanup is bringing to the table.
iconpanels and menu's on the toolbar
This is _very_ _very_ nice!!!
compared to the previous one, the attached patch adds a bit of code to
mainly QLToolbar.C, and is biggish because
Is it really normal that, when one asks for a glossary (list of
words), LyX uses nomencl.sty for a nomenclature (list of symbols)?
This seems very fishy to me. A document may want to have both a
glossary and a nomenclature.
JMarc
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But the file will not be magically be available to everybody right
>> now.
Uwe> No, why do you think so. I can only speak for MiKTeX: Wehn there
Uwe> is a stndardCV.layout, the corresponding class file will be
Uwe> downloaded and installed
Create a file A
SaveAs to B
Export xxx exports to A.xxx, instead of B.xxx.
Cheers
Bo
Try the attached. It retains the existing layout but sets a different
size policy. But I can do a grid if you prefer.
rh
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Attached is a patch fixing bug 1550. It pre-empts my previous effort,
>> using radio buttons, as suggested by Abdel a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Uwe> I would also replace the cv.layout with the simpleCV.layout in
Uwe> LyX 1.5. The current situation is quite confusing for the users
Uwe> and they should benefit from your efforts.
But the file will not be magically be available to everybody right
now.
No, wh
Richard Heck wrote:
> Attached is a patch fixing bug 1550. It pre-empts my previous effort,
> using radio buttons, as suggested by Abdel and JMarc, among others,
> rather than a combo box, as previously.
Could you please layout the dialog in a grid? As it is now, it can be shrinked
to almost zero
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> That was my thought for later. The idea is that we stop to distribute
> our own cv.cls, but do not distribute the new simplecv.cls (because we
> want it in tex distributions). So we cannot change name right now.
IMHO the earlier we change name the better. Now is an i
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> And finally, this new option I had forgotten about, that
Jean-Marc> allows to give a particular font to the first paragraph
Jean-Marc> after an \item (so that it acts as a kind of title). The
Jean-Marc> code that is i
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The question then is to know what to do on the LyX side. For 1.4, I
>> propose to add simplecv.layout alongside with cv.layout. For 1.5, I
>> am not sure what the best strategy is. Maybe do the same, and
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>> This is mostly what I intend to upload to CTAN (although the
>> .layout file for LyX would be packaged with LyX only). I would
>> appreciate all input before I send this.
Uwe> What's the difference to the e
On Thursday 12 April 2007 1:01:08 pm Georg Baum wrote:
> It is easy: increment the LyX file format number, and let lyx2lyx convert
> all cv files to simplecv. That will not help for 1.4, but will be a perfect
> solution for 1.5 (unless somebody has a home made layout for the 'other' cv
> package, b
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The question then is to know what to do on the LyX side. For 1.4, I
> propose to add simplecv.layout alongside with cv.layout. For 1.5, I am
> not sure what the best strategy is. Maybe do the same, and remove
> cv.layout in 1.6.
>
> Thoughts welcome.
It is easy: inc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
This is mostly what I intend to upload to CTAN (although the .layout
file for LyX would be packaged with LyX only). I would appreciate all
input before I send this.
What's the difference to the existing cv.cls btw.?
The question then is to know what to do on the
Hello,
I finally decided to do what is needed to have the cv class
distributed on CTAN (and thus hopefully most TeX distributions). Since
the name cv.cls is already taken, I decided to use simplecv.cls. The
new package contains proper documentation generated from a dtx file
(combined source+docum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
For me, it is clear that debug.[Ch] should go to support. Even though
there's some lyx-related constant definitions in there, this thing is
clearly _independent_ from the rest of LyX. I just don't understand
why we make ou
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
For me, it is clear that debug.[Ch] should go to support. Even though
there's some lyx-related constant definitions in there, this thing is
clearly _independent_ from the rest of LyX. I just don't understand why
we make our lives complicated by mai
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| PS: I am really tired of such ivory tower type discussions. src/support
| is not used by anything outside LyX. So why the f*** would it be
| absolutely necessary to not have constants named LYXRC and MATHED there.
|
| PPS: E
25 matches
Mail list logo
