[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
For me, it is clear that debug.[Ch] should go to support. Even though
there's some lyx-related constant definitions in there, this thing is
clearly _independent_ from the rest of LyX. I just don't understand
why we make our lives complicated by maintaining three different
versions of the same thing.
Is there some way to work around this. E.g renaming the constants to
something generic, or is that way too much work?
As Andre' said: "this could -in theory- be worked around by letting the
application 'register' its channels."
AFAIU, this means that we must rework the lyx_debug_trait class so that
we pass the lists of debug types at construction. Then we have two
choices for the LyXErr instance:
1) We instantiate the LyXErr object in the Singletons framework instead
of using the static instance.
2) We continue with the static instance but we create a static method to
register the debug trait.
Both solutions are doable but over the top and not worth it IMHO. AFAIU,
both solutions require that LyXErr becomes a class instead of a typedef.
Abdel.
