Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Lars Gullik Bjønnes ...> writes: | > > | Can someone explain how this "embedding" works? LyX itself understands | > > | LFUNs not Python so we'll still need to translate the python to a | > > | series of LF

Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes ...> writes: > > | Can someone explain how this "embedding" works? LyX itself understands > > | LFUNs not Python so we'll still need to translate the python to a > > | series of LFUNs, no? > > > > Yes. So imho it is simpler to write

Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Can someone explain how this "embedding" works? LyX itself understands > | LFUNs not Python so we'll still need to translate the python to a > | series of LFUNs, no? > > Yes. So imho it is simpler to write a lib python/ruby/java/whatever > that c

Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | André Pönitz wrote: | > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:24:18AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: | >> There's lots that is a mess about the LFUN language (ad hoc, | >> no formal grammar, etc) but it is powerful and will become | >> more so if someone adds the abil

Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:24:18AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: | > That use the LyXServer? There are a number of bibliography database | > programs. Pybliographer is the one I'm familiar with but there are | > others. | > | > There's also the LyXSocket

Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Angus Leeming
André Pönitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:24:18AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> There's lots that is a mess about the LFUN language (ad hoc, >> no formal grammar, etc) but it is powerful and will become >> more so if someone adds the ability to return queried-for >> information like these L

Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 17:46, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Shouldn't we simply embed Python now that it has become de facto the > Chosen Scripting Language? No, no, we will start the LI (Language Independent) sub-project since we don't want to alienate the perl, ruby, lua and scheme developers in

Re: [PATCH] remove redrawGUI

2006-07-13 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:24:18AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > That use the LyXServer? There are a number of bibliography database > programs. Pybliographer is the one I'm familiar with but there are > others. > > There's also the LyXSocket stuff which is conceptually similar (uses > sockets ra

Re: 1.4.2 windows installer does not recognize pre-installed miktex

2006-07-13 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 13 July 2006 18:56, Bo Peng wrote: > Didn't I said that normal windows users do not read any instruction or > documentations  :-) Could you please remove the word windows there, the sentence is still true without it. ;-) > Bo -- José Abílio

Re: 1.4.2 windows installer does not recognize pre-installed miktex

2006-07-13 Thread Bo Peng
On 7/13/06, Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bo Peng wrote: > The installer recognizes miktex after I gave it the path. It might be > helpful to say "enter the path to latex.exe" though, since I provided > c:\texmf first. It says exactly that :) Didn't I said that normal windows users

Re: Changes in the installed files from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2006-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
Some of the additions are obvious replacements to the removed ones (like configure), but I'm unsure about others. Could someone, please, confirm, that I'm building/installing correctly? Thanks! It looks correct. Joost

Changes in the installed files from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

2006-07-13 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Hello! I'm about to update the FreeBSD port print/lyx from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2. I notice, that the following files are no longer installed (relative to the ${PREFIX}): share/lyx/configure share/lyx/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx share/lyx/lyxrc.defaults share/lyx/packages.lst

Re: 1.4.2 windows installer does not recognize pre-installed miktex

2006-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
Bo Peng wrote: The installer recognizes miktex after I gave it the path. It might be helpful to say "enter the path to latex.exe" though, since I provided c:\texmf first. It says exactly that :) Joost

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Abdelrazak Younes wrote: | > Hello, | > As the title says... | > If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow. | | Please find attached the updated patch that I will commit now. I have | corrected Lars merge

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Abdelrazak Younes wrote: | > Hello, | > As the title says... | > If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow. | | Please find attached the updated patch that I will commit now. I have | corrected Lars merge issues and updated to latest

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello, As the title says... If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow. Please find attached the updated patch that I will commit now. I have corrected Lars merge issues and updated to latest trunk. Abdel. Index: BufferView.C

Re: 1.4.2 windows installer does not recognize pre-installed miktex

2006-07-13 Thread Bo Peng
This means that the MiKTeX registry key is missing. Did you install MiKTeX using the standard installer? You can of course locate it manually. I think (I am not quite sure) that I installed miktex separately, using the standard installer. The installer recognizes miktex after I gave it the path

Re: 1.4.2 windows installer does not recognize pre-installed miktex

2006-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
Bo Peng wrote: When I upgrade from 1.4.2svn to 1.4.2-1: the installer does not recognize my miktex installation in c:\texmf. It recognized all other components though. This means that the MiKTeX registry key is missing. Did you install MiKTeX using the standard installer? You can of course loc

1.4.2 windows installer does not recognize pre-installed miktex

2006-07-13 Thread Bo Peng
Hi, Joost, When I upgrade from 1.4.2svn to 1.4.2-1: the installer does not recognize my miktex installation in c:\texmf. It recognized all other components though. Bo

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Bo Peng
Bo> I can do that this weekend, if you think the python scripts are Bo> stable enough. Hmm, I thought you thought they were stable :) I do think they are stable. If you think they need more testing, there is no hurry. However, having the scripts in svn will speed up testing. Then I will b

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> - backport the no-sh set of patches from Bo, so that minsys is not >> needed anymore in windows. Bo> I can do that this weekend, if you think the python scripts are Bo> stable enough. Hmm, I thought you thought they were stable :) If you think

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Bo Peng
- backport the no-sh set of patches from Bo, so that minsys is not needed anymore in windows. I can do that this weekend, if you think the python scripts are stable enough. Bo

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Georg Baum wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: As a side note, I really think the coordcache concept is flawed. Well, I guess should be a bit more diplomatic in my words. I meant that the way the coordCache is used is flawed. What is problematic is it's use all other the place in LyXCode withou

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Bo Peng
Bo> Forget about configure, try scons now. :-) I do not think scons is immune to such errors. Well, there is no configure step in scons (it configures each time) so if you get a correct build, it is correct, unless you use tricks like rebuild=components, in which cases other components are not

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> No, I am not saying that. I was just clarifying the Abdelrazak> matter. I think there are two solutions: Abdelrazak> 1) make sure that the coordCache is up to date at the end Abdelrazak> of an

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Georg Baum
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > As a side note, I really think the coordcache concept is flawed. IIRC it was introduced as part of the two-step drawing scheme that helped to get rid of lots of hacks that were present in 1.3. If it is not properly documented somewhere please get Andre to write a short

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> No, I am not saying that. I was just clarifying the Abdelrazak> matter. I think there are two solutions: Abdelrazak> 1) make sure that the coordCache is up to date at the end Abdelrazak> of any user action. This was p

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.4.2 is released

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joost> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Public release of LyX version 1.4.2 Joost> Great! The Windows version will be available later today. It is in ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.4.2/ now. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Maybe, but I don't think this is related to this Abdelrazak> re-ordering in that particular case. FYI, it's Lars that Abdelrazak> changed the calls to updateMetrics, not me. I have to admit

Re: qt4(?) cursor/scrolling weirdness

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Edwin Leuven wrote: CASE 1: the visible cursor moves (to a strange spot), the document cursor stays put... 1. open userguide 2. move cursor to end (ctrl+end) 3. close 4. open userguide 5. click in the middle of the scrollbar then the cursor jumps to the top of the document and blinks (partly

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Maybe, but I don't think this is related to this Abdelrazak> re-ordering in that particular case. FYI, it's Lars that Abdelrazak> changed the calls to updateMetrics, not me. I have to admit that I did not follow the

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdel, I suspect it is related to your changes. Abdelrazak> Could be but not certain. I'll investigate. Abdelrazak> As a side note, I really think the coordcache concept is Abdelrazak> flawed. Or mayb

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Abdel, I suspect it is related to your changes. Abdelrazak> Could be but not certain. I'll investigate. Abdelrazak> As a side note, I really think the coordcache concept is Abdelrazak> flawed. Or maybe your reordering of how

qt4(?) cursor/scrolling weirdness

2006-07-13 Thread Edwin Leuven
CASE 1: the visible cursor moves (to a strange spot), the document cursor stays put... 1. open userguide 2. move cursor to end (ctrl+end) 3. close 4. open userguide 5. click in the middle of the scrollbar then the cursor jumps to the top of the document and blinks (partly invisible) in the t

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > I think the coordCache is guilty of most (all?) the crashes we see > > either on trunk or in 1.4.2. This concept is very fragile. > > OK. The problem is that I cannot reproduce most of the crashes yet. If I > can, I'll check if your patch i

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Did you test my patch fixing three map search related bugs, Jurgen? Not yet. > I think the coordCache is guilty of most (all?) the crashes we see > either on trunk or in 1.4.2. This concept is very fragile. OK. The problem is that I cannot reproduce most of the crashes

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: it is perhaps more the redraw_needed thing I am wary about. As I said in a previous mail, I am sure this is _the_ correct solution Hum... I am _not_ sure this is _the_ correct solution. Abdel.

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Hello, | > | | As the title says... | > | | If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow. | > Your branch does not look to be

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Hello, | > | | As the title says... | > | | If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow. | > Your branch does not look to be up to date wrt trunk. | > (Or

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Thoughts? There are still some unresolved, tricky crashes (see bugzilla). We should try especially to track down the ones related to gcc-4.1 (boost?). Did you test my patch fixing three map search related bugs, Jurgen? I think the coo

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: There is a crash on trunk, but I check it is unrelated to the patch: Yes, and another one 1/ Help>User Guide 2/ Enter the note inset with the arrow cursor 3/ go out the inset with the down arrow cursor 1/ Help>Introduction 2/ Shift-PageDown 3/ crash! Assertion

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | As the title says... | | If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow. Your branch does not look to be up to date wrt trunk. (Or perhaps it is your working copy) The patch dates from yesterday

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Since you are the release manager you can decide what is the best >> schedule for those releases. If you do that we have a known >> timeframe to work the fixes, instead of trying to push every >> forgotten fix at the last minute. Georg> M

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > I like this plan, I think that we should try to do time schedule > releases > for the stable branch. Not a bad idea actually. > Since you are the release manager you can decide what is the best > schedule > for those releases. If you do that we have a known timeframe

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Georg Baum wrote: > Do you have a list of the gcc4.1 related crahes? I'll need to check them at > home, where I compile with gcc 4.1. - 2414 - 2459 and probably - 2662 - 2677 It seems that the situation improved in general (for me with SuSE 10.1/gcc-4.1), the testcases do not crash anymore immed

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Georg Baum
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > There are still some unresolved, tricky crashes (see bugzilla). We should > try especially to track down the ones related to gcc-4.1 (boost?). Do you have a list of the gcc4.1 related crahes? I'll need to check them at home, where I compile with gcc 4.1. Georg

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 13 July 2006 10:15, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We could even release 1.4.3 in September with these features. > > Thoughts? I like this plan, I think that we should try to do time schedule releases for the stable branch. Since you are the release manager you can decide what is

Re: Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Thoughts? There are still some unresolved, tricky crashes (see bugzilla). We should try especially to track down the ones related to gcc-4.1 (boost?). Jürgen

Re: Metakey binding for LyX

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Sven" == Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sven> Hello guys, while working through the Debian BTS I've found a Sven> wishlist bug with a patch attached to make use of the Metakey Sven> within LyX. I donno if you like the patch nor if it's correct. I applied the patch to 1.4.3svn too

Re: [Patch] GUI API cleanup step 3: the MERGE patch to trunk

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | As the title says... | | If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow. Your branch does not look to be up to date wrt trunk. (Or perhaps it is your working copy) You also seems to have some mis-merge from trunk to branch.

Re: [PATCH] more xforms cleanup

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Andre Poenitz wrote: | | >On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 09:39:39PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: | > | >>Subject says it all. | >> | >>Michael | >> | >>Index: SConstruct | >>=== | >>--- SConstruct (

Plans for 1.4.3

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Besides all the usual small fixes we might stumble on, I plan to do two main things in 1.4.3: - backport the no-sh set of patches from Bo, so that minsys is not needed anymore in windows. - backport the outline feature. Martin told me he has a patch ready. We could even release 1.4.3 in Septe

Re: [Patch] Fix crash in rowpainter.C: paint

2006-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:28:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 04:05:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > | Nope there is a big difference. You are basically

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.4.2 is released

2006-07-13 Thread Joost Verburg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Public release of LyX version 1.4.2 Great! The Windows version will be available later today. Joost

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: OK. Since we have our 3rd tester Juergen> now, I'll propose that you shove your fix into branch and Juergen> trunk then. >> This is done now. Juergen> Thanks. BTW the crash was bug 2683. Oop

Re: Please to not commit to 1.4 branch

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I am doing the release. Georg> One last bit: I think you should update RELEASE-NOTES. I did it. It is very small now :) JMarc

ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.4.2 is released

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Public release of LyX version 1.4.2 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.4.2. This is a bug fix release that improves performance, stability and native OS support. Notable new features include: - LyX now automatically uses file viewers and editors s

Re: Please to not commit to 1.4 branch

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Marc> I am doing the release. OK, do what you want now. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> OK. Since we have our 3rd tester now, I'll propose that you > Juergen> shove your fix into branch and trunk then. > > This is done now. Thanks. BTW the crash was bug 2683. Jürgen

Re: Please to not commit to 1.4 branch

2006-07-13 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I am doing the release. One last bit: I think you should update RELEASE-NOTES. Georg

Please to not commit to 1.4 branch

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
I am doing the release. JMarc

Re: Broken MSVC project files in 1.4 branch

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joost> Should the broken MSVC project files stay in the 1.4 branch Joost> (development/Win32)? I don't think anyone is going to fix them Joost> now the SCons build system is available. Please remove them in trunk (and in branch after 1.4.

Re: [PATCH] unify/fix some cursor moving routines.

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I just noticed that I did not reconfigure using frontend=qt3. This >> means that make did not really rebuild lyx :) Juergen> I'm glad to hear that even you make such errors. >> I'll report

Re: [PATCH] Re: bug(?): strange behavior after ctrl-shift-left

2006-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Given that it fixes 3 bugs, one of it critical, another Juergen> pretty annoying, it would be nice to have. Jean-Marc> I think so too. Let's say that if we find a 3rd party Jean-Marc> tester before I release, it'll go