Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
|
| As the title says...
|
| If I don't get any objection, I'll do the merge tomorrow.
Your branch does not look to be up to date wrt trunk.
(Or perhaps it is your working copy)
The patch dates from yesterday before some changes from Michael G. were
committed. I'll of course update the patch before merging.
You also seems to have some mis-merge from trunk to branch.
If they are not related to the above please tell me what they are.
And I am not sure that your change to a synchronous calling
frontend<->kernel is good. However it can be put back later.
In this case this is a change to frontend<->frontend because the code I
moved really belonged to the frontend and not to the kernel.
And I still belive there are two many separate changes, but as nobody
seems to agree with me on the 'split-changes-into-independent-parts'
way or working I might just as well hold my tongue.
Please count the number of patches in my branch. I _have_ split the
changes into different commit. Of course the merge patch is gathering
everything. Are you saying that I should also split the merge patch?
If yes, I really don't understand what the branches are used for... and
I really don't want to do this additional work that is worth nothing IMO.
Abdel.
