Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Bo Peng a écrit :
>> What do you think?
>
> Great Job!
> I am convinced and I will certainly use with minimal capability
> (building LyX is enough).
I fear you both underestimate the amount of work that is needed to replace
the auto stuff. After all, there is a reson w
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> That's the same as for SVG-images. But the bitmap looks readable.
> Nervertheless the Imagemagick people are working on a vector graphics
> rendering engine but this is at the moment "far from beeing complete".
> Also Acrobat can't handle WMF. Do you know a program that could co
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I reproduced the bug by editing the LyX file with a text editor to
> generate the linebreak. I wonder that a linebreak in the path is
> produced by LyX. If yes we should avoid this.
I would be really surprised if it where produced by LyX. A linebreak in an
image path is not all
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> The way I am using QPixmap and QImage is probably not very optimal on
> X11 when the server and the client is on the same machine but it should
> be very efficient when they are not.
I don't think so. AFAIK the X server and client can use shared memory when
running on t
Edwin Leuven a écrit :
patch attached
this is what is left:
// pref dialog
QPrefColorsUi.ui: q3listbox.h
qcoloritem.h:#include
QPrefConvertersUi.ui: q3listbox.h
QPrefCopiersUi.ui: q3listbox.h
QPrefFileformatsUi.ui: q3listbox.h
QPrefsDialog.C: Q3ListBoxItem * const item =
// more t
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
addCheckedLineEdit is used indeed in some widgets but I don't really
know what it is doing.
One place this stuff *is* used is to check that the contents of two, tied
widgets are mutually consistent. Things like LaTeX glue le
Edwin Leuven a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
you might have noticed that i am avoiding the complicated things for
the moment...
I noticed but any little effort is well spent effort ;-)
a little cleaning never hurts (and i need to get a bit familiar again
with this stuff...)
consolidat
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:44:41PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
- connect(okPB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
+ connect( okPB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
The '-' version is the prefered style in LyX.
If you want to make it more readable, implement a
connect(QObject *, QString const &,
Bo Peng a écrit :
Urm... does one need to shout all the time when talking to cmake?
Pretty much looks like a argument with a senile FORTRAN compiler.
You have to agree that the following (src/support/SConscript) at least
looks better:
I agree Bo :-)
See, I knew you would beat me at this ;-)
Michael Gerz a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Unicode has to go forward anyway. I'd think that 1.5 now would not
make sense (since qt4 and gtk are not ready). When they are ready,
we'll see how far the unicode work has gone.It may be that the LyX
meeting is what we need to get unicode goin
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:37:10AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
>
> >Scientific Workplace.
>
> Ah, thanks.
>
> >>LyX with Imagemagick can handle wmf-images. I attached a LyX file and
> >>a wmf-image to test this.
> >
> >WMF is a vector format. ImageMagick can only convert this
I have to admit that a problem I have with these local layout files is
that we are going to loose all control over our files. Currently, if
there is a bug in article.layout, we can correct it. If we make local
versions of these files easy to handle, we are going to see everybody
using a file with
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
That's the same as for SVG-images. But the bitmap looks readable.
Nervertheless the Imagemagick people are working on a vector graphics
rendering engine but this is at the moment "far from beeing complete".
Also Acrobat can't handle WMF. Do you know a program that could convert
patch attached
this is what is left:
// pref dialog
QPrefColorsUi.ui: q3listbox.h
qcoloritem.h:#include
QPrefConvertersUi.ui: q3listbox.h
QPrefCopiersUi.ui: q3listbox.h
QPrefFileformatsUi.ui: q3listbox.h
QPrefsDialog.C: Q3ListBoxItem * const item =
// more tricky?
QLyXKeySym.C:#in
I think that you're in danger of spreading yourself too thin and would counsel
doing one thing at a time and doing it well. We know from experience that a big
You asked ;-)
I am glad you said this.
My whole work around lyx is making lyx more user-friendly. At least
presently, I am not touchi
Joost Verburg wrote:
Scientific Workplace.
Ah, thanks.
LyX with Imagemagick can handle wmf-images. I attached a LyX file and
a wmf-image to test this.
WMF is a vector format. ImageMagick can only convert this to a bitmap,
so you loose all quality.
That's the same as for SVG-images. But
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What is SWP?
Scientific Workplace.
LyX with Imagemagick can handle wmf-images. I attached a LyX file and a
wmf-image to test this.
WMF is a vector format. ImageMagick can only convert this to a bitmap,
so you loose all quality.
Joost
Dear LyX developers,
On the LyX homepage, www.lyx.org, yhe LyX Roadmap and Task list:
http://www.lyx.org/devel/tasks.php and the LyX Wanted Features list:
http://www.lyx.org/devel/roadmap.php have not been updated since September
2005.
It would be nice if these could be updated, and especial
Bo Peng wrote:
This is perhaps unrelated. The biggest advantages of SWP, according to
one of my friends, is that one can paste windows wmf figures directlry
to SWP.
What is SWP?
I do not know how SWP is handling that, but from what I
searched last time, there is no usable WMF->whatever conv
Bo Peng wrote:
This is perhaps unrelated. The biggest advantages of SWP, according to
one of my friends, is that one can paste windows wmf figures directlry
to SWP.
What is SWP?
I do not know how SWP is handling that, but from what I
searched last time, there is no usable WMF->whatever conv
Hanke, Alex wrote:
>> Can anyone explain why an eps figure inserted into my article using
>> the following code don't work:
>> \begin{figure}
>> \centering
>> \includegraphics[bb=162 252 450 540]{/Alex/Decision
>> Support/Figures/ExcurModelb.eps}
>> \caption{White Head Island}
>> \end{figure}
>
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:22:52PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I have lived without jpg->ps and gif->pdf conversions for the bigger
> > > part of my life and did not really miss
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have lived without jpg->ps and gif->pdf conversions for the bigger
> > part of my life and did not really miss that functionality.
>
> Ahhh, but that's because you're all of:
> * cleve
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Unicode has to go forward anyway. I'd think that 1.5 now would not
make sense (since qt4 and gtk are not ready). When they are ready,
we'll see how far the unicode work has gone.It may be that the LyX
meeting is what we need to get unicode going.
Abdel, do you have
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So,
> * if you guys want a bare build system that you can build lyx faster,
> I can provide one in a few days. You will have to tweak a few
> parameters for your system.
> * if you want a cross-platform build system with all the current
> options and autoconf
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have lived without jpg->ps and gif->pdf conversions for the bigger
> part of my life and did not really miss that functionality.
Ahhh, but that's because you're all of:
* clever
* a mathematician
* someone whose æsthetics allow him to use one of the
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> addCheckedLineEdit is used indeed in some widgets but I don't really
> know what it is doing.
One place this stuff *is* used is to check that the contents of two, tied
widgets are mutually consistent. Things like LaTeX glue lengths can be input in
a
Urm... does one need to shout all the time when talking to cmake?
Pretty much looks like a argument with a senile FORTRAN compiler.
You have to agree that the following (src/support/SConscript) at least
looks better:
# ---
# SConscript
#
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The attached was posted on bugzilla to fix the problem when people press
| Enter before or after an inset (inside float) in the hope of getting a
| caption in the right place. It is an incomplete fix but will work for
| the most common use cases, includ
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
you might have noticed that i am avoiding the complicated things for
the moment...
I noticed but any little effort is well spent effort ;-)
a little cleaning never hurts (and i need to get a bit familiar again
with this stuff...)
consolidated patch attached:
Inde
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't think so, as it is a very particular switch. Here is the
> pertinent comment in src/lyxfunc.C:
>
> void actOnUpdatedPrefs(LyXRC const & lyxrc_orig, LyXRC const & lyxrc_new)
> {
> // Why the switch you might ask. I
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> >You're correct. LyX will function perfectly well without ImageMagick.
>
> How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
> JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
>
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:45:59PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Index: src/frontends/qt4/Qt2BC.C
> ===
> --- src/frontends/qt4/Qt2BC.C (revision 13787)
> +++ src/frontends/qt4/Qt2BC.C (working copy)
> @@ -36,13 +36,7 @@
>
> void Qt2
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:20:32PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >>http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_do_I_use_CMake_to_build_LaTeX_documents.3F
>
> Cited piece of code:
>
> IF(LATEX_COMPILE)
> ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(
>OUTPUT${Document_BINARY_DIR}/TDocument.dvi
>DEPENDS ${Document_BINAR
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:44:41PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>
> - connect(okPB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
> + connect( okPB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
The '-' version is the prefered style in LyX.
If you want to make it more readable, implement a
connect(QObject *, QString const &, QObject *, Q
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:04:09PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know LyX can be used with
> limited graphic support without ImageMagick.
That's correct.
> It should of course be recommended to let the installer download
> ImageMagick for you if it's not
Edwin Leuven a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hey man, at this pace I think we could soon justify for a 1.5 release.
you might have noticed that i am avoiding the complicated things for the
moment...
I noticed but any little effort is well spent effort ;-)
consolidated patch attached:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hey man, at this pace I think we could soon justify for a 1.5 release.
you might have noticed that i am avoiding the complicated things for the
moment...
consolidated patch attached:
Index: src/frontends/qt4/ui/QErrorListUi.ui
Index: src/frontends/qt4/ui/QExternalUi
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Edwin Leuven a écrit :
i have the impression that this can simplified. am i right?
I guess so. IMHO this whole button controller thing should disappear.
Hum... just for clarification, I was of course meaning that this whole
button controller machinery should disa
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> So, if you can retain the functionality and flexibility
Angus> of the current solution but with nicer code that you can
Angus> understand, go for it!
Abdel> Actually, that's what I did in the Toc and Citation
Abdel> dia
Edwin Leuven a écrit :
these dialogs + associated files
Hey man, at this pace I think we could soon justify for a 1.5 release.
Good stuff.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> So, if you can retain the functionality and flexibility
Angus> of the current solution but with nicer code that you can
Angus> understand, go for it!
Abdel> Actually, that's what I did in the Toc and Citation
Abdel> dialog. My solution is very s
Helge Hafting a écrit :
I was asked to redo my test with a newer lyx 1.5, now
I have finally done it:
Small test of lyx qt3 and lyx qt4 revision 13787
Both executables use the same config and display.
Both apps have the exact same window size in pixels, and the main
windows happened to have the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Joost> No, see the debug output I mailed earlier today.
This one misses the ... part. Could you add it?
That part is totally normal, see below.
Joost> I have no configuration files (except lyxrc.dist) at all in
Joost> both the LyX Resources directory and the user
Edwin Leuven a écrit :
getting rid of qt3 convenience classes
ok?
If you tested it in it works the same, OK for me.
Abdel.
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin Leuven a écrit :
i have the impression that this can simplified. am i right?
I guess so. IMHO this whole button controller thing should disappear.
To quote a recent reply of yours to Bo, "it's always nicer to try t
Bo Peng wrote:
This is perhaps unrelated. The biggest advantages of SWP, according to
one of my friends, is that one can paste windows wmf figures directlry
to SWP. I do not know how SWP is handling that, but from what I
searched last time, there is no usable WMF->whatever converters.
SWP has
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Right, but the installer is for all users. Only a few users know the
details about graphics. Most of my collegues for example used EPS-images
because they didn't know that PDF can embed JPG, PNG and PDF-images
directly. So the installer must include Imagemagick by default (perh
Btw. It's one of LyX's strengths that you can use every kind of image
formats directly in LyX - there's no other text program who can do this.
When I want to advertise LyX this is a killer argument, because users
don't want to convert images from various sources to a certain format to
be able to u
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Uwe> How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
Uwe> JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
Uwe> GIF-images and export to PDF, etc. That isn't "function perfectly
Uwe> well" in my opinion.
Some functions do not work,
On Monday 01 May 2006 13:09, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:35:32PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > PS: FWIW, Susana completed with success her PhD. :-)
>
> So you've finally got one in the family. Or did I miss anything?
I hope to do the same next September/October. :-)
So
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:35:32PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> PS: FWIW, Susana completed with success her PhD. :-)
So you've finally got one in the family. Or did I miss anything?
Andre'
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:34:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Index: text3.C
> | ===
> | --- text3.C (revision 13775)
> | +++ text3.C (working copy)
> | @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is it that you have lyxrc.defaults, but not textclass.lst in your
>> user directory. In this case, the following should help.
Joost> No, see the debug output I mailed earlier today.
This one misses the ... part. Could you add it?
Jo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Joost> Still no difference, same error. Note that it does reconfigure
Joost> when I put some old textclass.lst in Resources\lyx. So it
Joost> probably looks for textclass.lst before it gets to this code in
Joost> lyx_main.C.
Is it that you have lyxrc.defaults, but not
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> You're correct. LyX will function perfectly well without
>> ImageMagick.
Uwe> How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
Uwe> JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
U
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Try these updated patches. This is really embarassing, Georg
>> pointed out the bug a long time ago, but for some reason I did not
>> look at it at the time.
Joost> Still no difference, same error. No
Angus Leeming wrote:
You're correct. LyX will function perfectly well without ImageMagick.
How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
GIF-images and export to PDF, etc.
That isn't "function perfectly wel
Hello,
I would like to suggest an improvement to the beamer.layout file: Add
support for fragile frames (like plain, but fragile). These are needed
when including verbatim material or lstlisting code snippets. I tried
to mimic BeginPlainFrame, but it did not work. Somehow I had to use
\begin{f
Actually, configure.py emulates sed to use the information in
chkconfig.sed (like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!yes!g"). Bo, if you can think of
a format that would be easier for python, we have no reason to stick
to this weird syntax. A possibility would be to replace it by lines
like
chk_article=yes
tha
Hi, JMarc,
As you wish, I have added support for "none". Updated patch is attached.
However, the trunk is totally messed up now in that lyxrc.default can
not be loaded at all, so I can not test. (It compiles OK, and 'auto'
was tested before.
OK to apply?
Bo
Index: src/graph.C
==
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> LOL! chkconfig.sed? Do we retain a dependency on sed still?
Angus> Why?
Actually, configure.py emulates sed to use the information in
chkconfig.sed (like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!yes!g"). Bo, if you can think of
a format that would be e
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> Committing soon.
Done.
JMarc
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> There was a removeExtraFiles at the end of configure.py. Someone
Bo> removed it with reasons I can not remember.
Jean-Marc> I suspect it is my fault. I'll check.
Indeed :(
On May 3, 2006, at 2:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I have the same. (I've been accessing other languages by
Bennett> doing "export LANG=FR_fr" and running LyX from the same
Bennett> terminal session.
What happens if you do
e
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> There was a removeExtraFiles at the end of configure.py. Someone
Bo> removed it with reasons I can not remember.
I suspect it is my fault. I'll check.
JMarc
Why do you need configure.py to set "auto" entries? Isn't it enough to
rely on canOpenFile in LyX itself?
'' means no menu item, even if a viewer exists (for example, html
viewer without a broken converter should not appear)
'auto' means menu item if a view exists.
'specific viewer' means menu
On 5/3/06, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> After running configure.py, I find the following files that should not
> be there unless --keep-temps is specified:
>
> chkconfig.sed
> wrap_chkconfig.log
> chkconfig.vars
> wrap_chkconfig.ltx
> chklatex.log
> chkla
The attached was posted on bugzilla to fix the problem when people press
Enter before or after an inset (inside float) in the hope of getting a
caption in the right place. It is an incomplete fix but will work for
the most common use cases, including the one Uwe described.
BTW shouldn't we be mov
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I am not going for another round of being release manager for a
| Lars> release, se we need to appoint one. I think we should take turns
| Lars> on being release for differ
Joost Verburg wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
So at least python.exe, sh.exe etc will be in, right? Installing full
python and msys is unacceptable even if they are downloaded
automatically.
Yes, these very essential GPL-compatible things (LyX won't configure or
run without them), will be bundled. It i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
After running configure.py, I find the following files that should not
be there unless --keep-temps is specified:
chkconfig.sed
wrap_chkconfig.log
chkconfig.vars
wrap_chkconfig.ltx
chklatex.log
chklatex.ltx
chklayouts.tex
Could someone who knows about python (Bo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Weird. Could you send the result of "lyx -dbg init,tclass"?
Initializing LyX::init...
About to read lyxrc.dist... Found in c:/Program
Files/LyX14/Resources/lyxrc.dist
About to read lyxrc.defaults... Not found.
About to read preferences... Not found.
About to read e
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:56:29PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >
> >I was able to configure LyX on Cygwin for the official qt3 by simply
> >
> >../configure --with-frontend=qt --with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/qt3 \
> > --with-qt-includes=/usr/include/qt3
> >
>
> Qt is indeed found. However, with this simple co
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Try these updated patches. This is really embarassing, Georg
>> pointed out the bug a long time ago, but for some reason I did not
>> look at it at the time.
Joost> Still no difference, same error. No
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> This would not make sense if the child document has a different
Georg> document class. Some time ago I proposed to create a special
Georg> child document format that has a reference to the master. This
Georg> lead to a heavy discussion
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> This is not the supposed way to use a local layout file. The basic
Bo> idea of this patch is to make working on an existing lyx document
Bo> with foreign layout easier.
Agreed.
Bo> With a was-coming but stopped second patch, users can create
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Try these updated patches. This is really embarassing, Georg pointed out the
bug a long time ago, but for some reason I did not look at it at the
time.
Still no difference, same error. Note that it does reconfigure when I
put some old textclass.lst in Resources\lyx
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Hello LyXers, under
Uwe>
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=9951
Uwe> you can find the fixed version 2.01 of the windows installer for
Uwe> LyX 1.4.1.
The files are now on ftp.lyx.org, except the
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> I do not get it. Files opened through session are indeed "files
Bo> opened via command-line or File->Open", just that they are opened
Bo> last time, and are *already* in the lastfiles list. Re-adding
Bo> these filenames will not change anything
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am not going for another round of being release manager for a
Lars> release, se we need to appoint one. I think we should take turns
Lars> on being release for different releases.
This is a good idea indeed, if you find a vol
After running configure.py, I find the following files that should not
be there unless --keep-temps is specified:
chkconfig.sed
wrap_chkconfig.log
chkconfig.vars
wrap_chkconfig.ltx
chklatex.log
chklatex.ltx
chklayouts.tex
Could someone who knows about python (Bo?) fix it?
JMarc
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Could you try one of the following patches? They make sure that
>> reconfiguration is done if lyxrc.defaults is not found. JMarc
Joost> It still doesn't work on Windows. Again, when no configuration
J
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Or character widths... LyX does a lot of that. Profiling would
Martin> tell.
Yes! Profiling! Profiling!
We really need that. Preferably with oprofile (or sysprof, but only if
pissing John L off does not scare you).
JMarc
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > Unless I find some essential problem with scons, I will not use cmake.
| > > (Of course, if you can rewrite our auto* with cmake, I will cheer like
| > > a real cheerleader. :-)
| > I am sure you will beat me at it and offer us a great lyx integrated
| >
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Nevertheless, the fact that viewer and edito are noz part of the
> format declaration itself is bad conceptually, since it means there is
> no way to change the format without changing the helpe
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 09:56 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> I was asked to redo my test with a newer lyx 1.5, now
> I have finally done it:
>
> Small test of lyx qt3 and lyx qt4 revision 13787
>
> Both executables use the same config and display.
> Both apps have the exact same window size in pixel
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Unfortunately it is not included on several recent Linux distros (but that
| > is beginning to change)
|
| The same as scon.
|
| > Manual installation in a non-standard prefix
| > (not /usr/local) was a bit difficult when I did it (~ a year ago or so),
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Bo> Yes. That was for 1.5. I am interested in this macro since cygwin
| Bo> has boost and I should make use of it instead of the included
| Bo> ones.
|
| The macro really looks very complicat
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Please repost the patch as there are multiple versions from Enrico
>> and you and I don't know which one to apply.
Bo> Attached.
Thanks for the file. I have just one question (you have probably
explained it already, but my skull is thick, so b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 28 Apr 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > I guess we should formalize our release procedure a tiny bit at the same
| > time. (Like a release checklist, pre-release period, getting people to
| > test, primary/secondary platforms/os etc)
|
| What exactly is invol
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Not sure what the appropriate solution is.
Georg> But I am: The currently discussed auto-view patch by Bo. His
Georg> solution is windows only currently, but once it is in it should
Georg> not be difficult to extend that to OS X, too. The
I was asked to redo my test with a newer lyx 1.5, now
I have finally done it:
Small test of lyx qt3 and lyx qt4 revision 13787
Both executables use the same config and display.
Both apps have the exact same window size in pixels, and the main
windows happened to have the same sizes too.
First i
Richard Kleeman wrote:
Interesting follow up on Lxer:
http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/22539/
I liked this part:
Until you free an author from formatting, you and they can have no idea
how much of a dead weight they are carrying around every day, without
realising it. Until they experience w
Bennett Helm wrote:
> On May 2, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Bennett> Am I right in thinking that settings from lyxrc.defaults and
>> Bennett> preferences will overwrite the settings from lyxrc.dist?
>
95 matches
Mail list logo
