>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am not going for another round of being release manager for a Lars> release, se we need to appoint one. I think we should take turns Lars> on being release for different releases. This is a good idea indeed, if you find a volunteer :) [I am not] Lars> In that vein I also propose that the release manager, continues Lars> to manage 1.X.x releases. This is indeed possible, although I can continue to be stable maintainer if people want me to. I think the two jobs are a bit different. Lars> On trunk the release manager will not have a lot of power, Lars> except being able to say "stop, we need to stabiliza for Lars> branching/release", on the branch the release manager will be Lars> all-powerful. And you retain overall power as project leader, right? OK, now that I think about it, what you propose is to delegate the administrative part of releases. This makes sense. Lars> We also need to address the question wrt releasing 1.5 soon or Lars> wait for "major" features. (Wrt unicode, unless I get some help Lars> it will go slowly forward.) Unicode has to go forward anyway. I'd think that 1.5 now would not make sense (since qt4 and gtk are not ready). When they are ready, we'll see how far the unicode work has gone.It may be that the LyX meeting is what we need to get unicode going. JMarc
