On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> João, it would be asking too much to repost an updated version of all your
> pending patches?
I will do this tomorrow.
> I'll apply non-controversial ones and ask for advice on the rest.
>
> Thanks (and sorry for the delay), Alfredo
I'm sorry f
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:26:09AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:05:21PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > What is "DESM"? Google --> "commonly used anatomic prefix for
> > terms which relate to the ligaments."
>
> It's certainly a pain in one anatomical area
Just o
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:44:19AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Needed to compile.
>
> - Martin
>
>
> Index: ParagraphList_fwd.h
> ===
> RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/ParagraphList_fwd.h,v
> retrieving revision 1
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:44:35PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > cvs from today.
> > I have tried to make a minimal lyx-example for the undo crash.
> > 1.) Select some text inside the enumarated part
> > 2.) type any text
>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Since all other BufferView data members are in the Pimpl, shouldn't
> this go in there too?
Maybe, maybe not.
Actually I prefer to have simple stuff not pimpled. Including getters
and setters we end up with ~20 LOC just for a pimpl
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:39:57PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:02PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > x_target?
>
> saved_x ? latent_x ?
>
> Isn't the big fat comment I added enough ?
The comment is still there.
I don't care about the name but Lars did not like it.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:35:10PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > Needed to compile.
>
> No way! (Do you know how long I spent minimizing the stuff in the
> headers?)
>
> Could you ascertain what is going wrong please rther than provide a
> field bandage wh
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> | On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:43:59PM +, John Levon spake thusly:
> >> a conglomerate-style note at the bottom of the inset :
> | [Element: firstname] Stevennn
>
> Isn't that a bit verbose? (space gr
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:05:21PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> What is "DESM"?
> Google --> "commonly used anatomic prefix for terms which relate to the
> ligaments."
It's certainly a pain in one anatomical area
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same pe
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:17:14AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Foo foo foo Stevennn foo foo foo foo
> > \--First name--/
>
> How? Inline yes, but this? And wouldn't the following do
>
> [Element: firstname] Stevennn
With a frame arou
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:52:32PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Ok, but did I got the objections right?
Think so. ...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
>>> Coments?
>
> To me it looks good. So if you are still able to spellcheck, just
> commit.
Done, thanks. I will remove all dead code tomorrow.
Alfredo
The search/replace/changes cleanup [lyxfind.C attached separately]
Comments?
Alfredo
/**
* \file lyxfind.C
* This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
* Licence details can be found in the file COPYING.
*
* \author Lars Gullik Bjønnes
* \author John Levon
* \author Jürgen Vigna
*
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> | No problem at all. Was that a patch or a poem? Pretty verbose isn't it
> | ;-)
>
> what parts?
the #warning parts ... (it wasn't a criticism)
Alfredo
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | Pretty funny actually :-) Once you get over the claustrophobia...
>>
>> I have a patch that solves the problem for me.
>>
>> Unless you find huge problems with this I will commit it.
>
| No problem at all. Was th
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> spellcheck cleanup. Makes posible to remove a large amount of code from
>> BufferView, LyXText, insets/.
>> Fixes the problem of insets being open while spellchecking.
>>
>> Coments?
To me it looks good. So if you ar
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> | Pretty funny actually :-) Once you get over the claustrophobia...
>
> I have a patch that solves the problem for me.
>
> Unless you find huge problems with this I will commit it.
No problem at all. Was that a patch or a poem? Pretty verbose isn't it ;-)
Alfredo
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Pretty funny actually :-) Once you get over the claustrophobia...
I have a patch that solves the problem for me.
Unless you find huge problems with this I will commit it.
? Config
? dispatch-4.diff
? dispatch-5.diff
? dispatch-6.diff
? dispatch-7
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> spellcheck cleanup. Makes posible to remove a large amount of code from
> BufferView, LyXText, insets/.
> Fixes the problem of insets being open while spellchecking.
>
> Coments?
>
> Alfredo
Upmh wrong patch. Try this one instead...
Alfredo
Index: ControlSpellchecke
spellcheck cleanup. Makes posible to remove a large amount of code from
BufferView, LyXText, insets/.
Fixes the problem of insets being open while spellchecking.
Coments?
Alfredo
Index: ControlSpellchecker.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | With the cursor inside an inset, almost nothing seems to work: C-z, C-f,
> | etc. Heck, even File->Exit from the menus doesn't do anything.
>
> :-)
>
Pretty funny actually :-) Once you get over the claustrophobia
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| With the cursor inside an inset, almost nothing seems to work: C-z, C-f,
| etc. Heck, even File->Exit from the menus doesn't do anything.
:-)
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| it is a concept used to describe when perishable produce (milk, meat,
| jam) should be removed from the shop shelf as it is likely to be less
| than perfect (mouldy).
>
| Also used to describe people who are starting to miss important words
| from th
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:43:59PM +, John Levon spake thusly:
|
>> It would be fairly easy, surely, to use ERT-style inline always, and add
>> a conglomerate-style note at the bottom of the inset :
>>
>> Foo foo foo Stevennn
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Needed to compile.
No way! (Do you know how long I spent minimizing the stuff in the
headers?)
Could you ascertain what is going wrong please rther than provide a
field bandage when a butterfly plaster will do.
--
Angus
Needed to compile.
- Martin
Index: ParagraphList_fwd.h
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/ParagraphList_fwd.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 ParagraphList_fwd.h
--- ParagraphList_fwd.h 6 Sep 2003 12:36:51
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:43:59PM +, John Levon spake thusly:
>
>> It would be fairly easy, surely, to use ERT-style inline always,
>> and add a conglomerate-style note at the bottom of the inset :
>>
>> Foo foo foo Stevennn foo foo foo foo
>> \-
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:43:59PM +, John Levon spake thusly:
> It would be fairly easy, surely, to use ERT-style inline always, and add
> a conglomerate-style note at the bottom of the inset :
>
> Foo foo foo Stevennn foo foo foo foo
> \--First n
On Friday 31 October 2003 10:50 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Why not make the tree structure explicit, with leaf and node base
> | classes from which insets can derive? Wouldn't it make life much
> | simpler?
>
> Moving towards that... slowly...
Good t
Kornel Benko wrote:
> What is "DESM"?
> Google --> "commonly used anatomic prefix for terms which relate to the
> ligaments."
DEPM = "Delete empty paragraph mechanism".
Delete also double spaces. As at some point in time John planned to split
the "delete double spaces" thing from the "delete e
With the cursor inside an inset, almost nothing seems to work: C-z, C-f,
etc. Heck, even File->Exit from the menus doesn't do anything.
Alfredo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 3. November 2003 21:46, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > I have one more. While searching for undo I found, that
> > deleting Title in this file crashes lyx too.
> >
> > 1.) Open file
> > 2.) Move cursor to title-start
> > 3.) de
Kornel Benko wrote:
> I have one more. While searching for undo I found, that
> deleting Title in this file crashes lyx too.
>
> 1.) Open file
> 2.) Move cursor to title-start
> 3.) delete title
> 4.) move cursor -> crash
>
> Kornel
This is DESM. As I hate DESM, I will leave it to someone else
Kornel Benko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> cvs from today.
> I have tried to make a minimal lyx-example for the undo crash.
> 1.) Select some text inside the enumarated part
> 2.) type any text
> 3.) undo it
> 4.) undo once again -> command not! disabled, -> crash
This is the p
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Martin Vermeer wrote:
|
>> Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the adequate.
| Who said "The cost of perfection is bankrupty" ?
Some english businessman: "The cost of perfection is prohibitive."
basically the only reference I found.
--
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Has someone been saying you're passed your sell-by date?
>
> I have no idea that is.
it is a concept used to describe when perishable produce (milk, meat,
jam) should be removed from the shop shelf as it is likely to be less
than perfect (mouldy).
Also used to d
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the adequate.
Who said "The cost of perfection is bankrupty" ?
Garst
Jose' Matos wrote:
> 2) UI where it is assumed that the box inside a box model is too difficult
> for the normal user to grasp.
>
Does LyX have any "normal" users ?
Garst
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Perhaps better, perhaps not... in the .layout file this can be used,
> but when inserted by the user (in some dialog) I don't want the user
> to be required to know what the latex will look like.
Noble goal, I must admit that I resort to the LaTeX Companion far less
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:42:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Mee too (except for some minor detail). Just cannot invest the time
> | right now, and I want it to work for XML now -- which doesn't need
> | what you propose here (wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 3. November 2003 20:08, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > cvs from today.
> > I have tried to make a minimal lyx-example for the undo crash.
> > 1.) Select some text inside the enumarated part
> > 2.) type any text
> > 3.) undo it
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
> InsetText * in = &tabular.getCellInset(i);
> if (inset == in) {
> @@ -451,11 +450,9 @@ bool InsetTabular::lockInsetInInset(Buff
> resetPos(bv);
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Mee too (except for some minor detail). Just cannot invest the time
| right now, and I want it to work for XML now -- which doesn't need
| what you propose here (which BTW is rather similar to what John dreamt
| up in a previous life).
the question is
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:39:01PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
>
> On Monday 03 November 2003 17:56, Andre Poenitz wrote:
...
> 2) UI where it is assumed that the box inside a box model is too difficult
> for the normal user to grasp.
>
> Yet André does not get too many complains about
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
| I am working on the subjects discussed here last Friday.
>
| * Rename *ascii* to *plaintext* for insets.
| * Rename *LatexRunParams* to *OutputParams*
| * Create new files for output:
| - output_latex.[Ch]
|
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:29:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> This I like.
Mee too (except for some minor detail). Just cannot invest the time
right now, and I want it to work for XML now -- which doesn't need
what you propose he
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Unless someone object this will go in.
>
| Good. Chuck it in then.
I am.
>> (I am not finished, neither cleanup wise nor otherwise...)
>
| Has someone been saying you're passed your sell-by date?
I have no idea that is.
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Does any has any objection to move texrow outside of buffer?
> How about runChktex?
Ask yourself is either part of a Buffer concept? Then move 'em ;-)
--
Angus
On Monday 03 November 2003 19:04, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> >> This is suspiciously like the language used in
> >> lib/external_templates. Is the latter an ExternalStyle? I guess
> >> that it is really.
> >
> > No, since it is not related with external entities.
>
> Sorry José,
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Is is probably better:
>>>
>> | Format LaTeX
>> | Preamble "\newcommand{\firstname}[1]{\emph{\small #1}}"
>> | Header "\firstname{"
>> | Footer "}"
>> | End
>>>
>> |
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:25:42PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> | Comments please.
>
> Please dont' think that this is XML specific.
>
> By just adding a bit more code this might be used for character
> styles. (logical markup)
Damn.
Can't I keep anything secret from you?
;-)
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Is is probably better:
>>
> | Format LaTeX
> | Preamble "\newcommand{\firstname}[1]{\emph{\small #1}}"
> | Header "\firstname{"
> | Footer "}"
> | End
>>
> | but you get the idea...
>
> Perhaps better, perhaps not.
Jose' Matos wrote:
>> This is suspiciously like the language used in
>> lib/external_templates. Is the latter an ExternalStyle? I guess
>> that it is really.
>
> No, since it is not related with external entities.
Sorry José, I don't understand. external_templates is definitely
concerned with
Hi,
I am working on the subjects discussed here last Friday.
* Rename *ascii* to *plaintext* for insets.
* Rename *LatexRunParams* to *OutputParams*
* Create new files for output:
- output_latex.[Ch]
- output_plaintext.[Ch]
Kornel Benko wrote:
> cvs from today.
> I have tried to make a minimal lyx-example for the undo crash.
> 1.) Select some text inside the enumarated part
> 2.) type any text
> 3.) undo it
> 4.) undo once again -> command not! disabled, -> crash
>
> Kornel
Thanks Kornel! I will look into it.
Alfr
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Unless someone object this will go in.
Good. Chuck it in then.
> (I am not finished, neither cleanup wise nor otherwise...)
Has someone been saying you're passed your sell-by date?
--
Angus
On Monday 03 November 2003 18:52, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Is is probably better:
> >
> > Format LaTeX
> > Preamble "\newcommand{\firstname}[1]{\emph{\small #1}}"
> > Header "\firstname{"
> > Footer "}"
> > End
> >
> > but you get the idea...
>
> This is suspiciously like the language used in
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> | wrote:
>>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> | Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per
>>> | BufferView, not one per inset
On Monday 03 November 2003 18:46, John Levon wrote:
>
> Indeed, he doesn't. That's because typing and typesetting of math as
> opposed to text is very different in terms of user experience (logical
> structure is "nearer the surface" in the user's model, most formulae are
> rather fiddly, the struc
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:43:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> x_latent_pos_read_doc_at_declaration
Hmm, now you are reminding me of a certain lecturer during my undergrad
CS days :)
(Running joke was that he wrote programs by encoding the entire logic in
a single variable name :)
john
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> CharacterStyle FirstName
>> Format LaTeX
>> Header "\firstname{"
>> Footer "}"
>> Font
>> Series xxx
>> Sizeyyy
>> EndFont
>> End
>
> Is is probably better:
>
> Format LaTeX
> Preamble "\newcommand{\firstname}[1]{\emph{\small #1}}"
> Header "\firstname{"
> Footer
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:02PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> x_target?
>
| saved_x ? latent_x ?
>
| Isn't the big fat comment I added enough ?
not with the x_fix name :-)
But sure, the comment helps a lot.
x_latent_pos_read_doc_at_declaration
--
On Monday 03 November 2003 18:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> First we need something to hold the firstname in LyX. f.ex. an inset.
> Could also be done by dynamic "font properties".
>
> We also want the user to be able to set how this firstname should be
> rendered, bold, smallcaps, italics, re
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:39:01PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Yet André does not get too many complains about mathed present navigational
> model. :-)
Indeed, he doesn't. That's because typing and typesetting of math as
opposed to text is very different in terms of user experience (logical
stru
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:29:49PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> This patch offers an inset to contain an XML element that is smaller
> than a paragraph, typically a word or small phrase. It is used in
> docbook and the example document for demonstration. Currently only
> firstname, surname, fil
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is is probably better:
>
| Format LaTeX
| Preamble "\newcommand{\firstname}[1]{\emph{\small #1}}"
| Header "\firstname{"
| Footer "}"
| End
>
| but you get the idea...
Perhaps better, perhaps not...
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:02PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> x_target?
saved_x ? latent_x ?
Isn't the big fat comment I added enough ?
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Monday 03 November 2003 17:56, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> But I still don't get the difference to either InsetEnvironment ("bigger
> things") or 'Font changes as insets' ("smaller things"), both of which
> do not seem to get much support...
As I understand it we have two reasons:
1) a clear
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| CharacterStyle FirstName
| Format LaTeX
| Header "\firstname{"
| Footer "}"
| Font
| Series xxx
| Sizeyyy
| EndFont
| End
| Format
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:22:23PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:02:35PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > The difference implementation wise might not be huge.
>
> If there is a difference at all.
>
> > Just to have a short recap on character styles:
> >
> > in l
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:08:43PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Maybe we must settle at a 'round trip' definition. There are several
> > possibilities:
> >
> > 1. round trip in the weak sense:
> > .lyx -> .tex -> .dvi == .lyx -> .tex -> .lyx -> .tex -> .dvi
> >
> >
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:02:35PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> The difference implementation wise might not be huge.
If there is a difference at all.
> Just to have a short recap on character styles:
>
> in latex we'd like to have
>
>"This \firstname{Lars Gullik} is my firstname."
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Trying to move along...
Rediffed dispatch-7.diff
Unless someone object this will go in.
(I am not finished, neither cleanup wise nor otherwise...)
? Config
? dispatch-4.diff
? dispatch-5.diff
? dispatch-6.diff
? dispatch-7.diff
? doit.sh
? src/d
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Try to stick to LyX-style formatting:
>
>if (c == '{') {
>
> [There are other plases like that]
I accidently sent the wrong patch. The non tex2lyx part of the patch was not
intended and contains some half-finished test stuff written some time ago.
I hope you notice
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
>> | one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection ha
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Maybe we must settle at a 'round trip' definition. There are several
> possibilities:
>
> 1. round trip in the weak sense:
> .lyx -> .tex -> .dvi == .lyx -> .tex -> .lyx -> .tex -> .dvi
>
> 2. round trip in the realistic sense:
>
> .lyx == .lyx -> .tex -> .lyx
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:46:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> |- three-box-drawing
>>
>> Do you _really_ need that...
>> This is just for very short phrases... one two words.
>
| If so, tha
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
> | one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection have not been using
> | their x_fix at all.
> >
> |
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:46:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> |- three-box-drawing
>
> Do you _really_ need that...
> This is just for very short phrases... one two words.
If so, than probably not. But it would hamper its usability for
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
| one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection have not been using
| their x_fix at all.
>
| Small step towards cursor globalization. [Finally we'd have one 'real'
| cursor pe
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|- three-box-drawing
Do you _really_ need that...
This is just for very short phrases... one two words.
>> Then with a bit more magic we will have character style support...
>> emph and noun should both use this.
>
| But with single-box-drawing UI w
Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection have not been using
their x_fix at all.
Small step towards cursor globalization. [Finally we'd have one 'real'
cursor per bv]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedo
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:29:49PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> This patch offers an inset to contain an XML element that is smaller
>> than a paragraph, typically a word or small phrase. It is used in
>> docbook and the example document for demonstra
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | That's funny! I didn't even notice the slip. I read "wasn't" where
> | you had written "was". The mind is a wonderful pattern-scanner...
>
> I also thought "was" perfectly ok... but that is because I have no
> idea what "pejorative" means.
pejorative adj. & n. --- a
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:25:42PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This patch offers an inset to contain an XML element that is smaller
> | than a paragraph, typically a word or small phrase. It is used in
> | docbook and the example document fo
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This patch offers an inset to contain an XML element that is smaller
| than a paragraph, typically a word or small phrase. It is used in
| docbook and the example document for demonstration. Currently only
| firstname, surname, filename and literate, b
On Monday 03 November 2003 5:01 pm, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> No. My hack is this one:
This is in neither the 13x nor 14x trees AFAICS.
Angus
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:29:49PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> This patch offers an inset to contain an XML element that is smaller
> than a paragraph, typically a word or small phrase. It is used in
> docbook and the example document for demonstration. Currently only
> firstname, surname, file
This patch offers an inset to contain an XML element that is smaller
than a paragraph, typically a word or small phrase. It is used in
docbook and the example document for demonstration. Currently only
firstname, surname, filename and literate, but that's only the start
-- there's lots of those in
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:27:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Sorry about my language. It was meant to sound pejorative.
>> Yikes! Freudian slip, obviously. Please swap "wasn't" for "was".
>
| That's funny! I didn't eve
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:46:55PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Angus> Sorry about my language. It was meant to sound pejorative.
> >
> > Angus> Unfortunately, what works for you appears to break
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:28:44PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Sorry about my language. It was meant to sound pejorative.
>
> Angus> Unfortunately, what works for you appears to break things for
> Angus> those running
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:27:45PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Sorry about my language. It was meant to sound pejorative.
> Yikes! Freudian slip, obviously. Please swap "wasn't" for "was".
That's funny! I didn't even notice the slip. I read "wasn't" where
you had written
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:24:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > The latext Cygwin tetex only handles the Unix-style paths. Therefore,
> > the conversion to Win32 paths is unnecessary and counterproductive.
> >
> > I have no problems with graphics (rendering on screen or running
> > through LaT
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Sorry about my language. It was meant to sound pejorative.
>
> Angus> Unfortunately, what works for you appears to break things for
> Angus> those running the Win32 port. Hence my suggestion: wrap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
cvs from today.
I have tried to make a minimal lyx-example for the undo crash.
1.) Select some text inside the enumarated part
2.) type any text
3.) undo it
4.) undo once again -> command not! disabled, -> crash
Kornel
- -
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:46:47PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:44:33PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > > See attached.
> >
> > It certainly looks like the code that originaly used this has
> > dissappeared.
>
> I'm well behind: what stores bookmarks now, and how doe
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Sorry about my language. It was meant to sound pejorative.
Angus> Unfortunately, what works for you appears to break things for
Angus> those running the Win32 port. Hence my suggestion: wrap the
Angus> call to latex inside a script
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Sorry about my language. It was meant to sound pejorative.
Yikes! Freudian slip, obviously. Please swap "wasn't" for "was".
--
Angus
On Monday 03 November 2003 4:03 pm, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:21:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Kayvan has implemented the most attrocious hack that I suspect is the
> > real cause of our problems under mingw. This is from os_win32.C:
> >
> > string os::external_pat
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
