> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Nonsense. It is your cake with my icing. Please apply yourself.
Juergen> If you insist... But you won't stop me adding you to the
Juergen> changelogs. Before I apply, though, I want to have at lea
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:17:30PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:29:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:04:32PM +0200, Pascal Francq wrote:
> > > Hi, I have a request that could perhaps be a future feature of LyX
> > > concerning th
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:02:39PM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> On czwartek 18 wrzesie? 2003 12:50 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Has anybody thought about how 'support' would look like if everybody has
> > a differen UI?
> >
> > Q: How do I xxx?
> >
> > A1: Layout->Paragraph
> > A2: Edit->Paragraph Set
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:35:00PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:30:18AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > + Item "[Boxed]|B" "note-insert Boxed"
>
> In my usual "trivial carping" mode - please don't. It's visually jarring
> and potentially misleading.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:51:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
> > paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > It wouldn't be too hard to ex
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
> paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
> infrastructure.
>
> It wouldn't be too hard to extend this to fancybox support.
>
> Does this look like the right thing to do?
What ha
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:30:18AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> + Item "[Boxed]|B" "note-insert Boxed"
In my usual "trivial carping" mode - please don't. It's visually jarring
and potentially misleading.
(The "correct" way to do something like this is with gnome-style menu
icons)
This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
infrastructure.
It wouldn't be too hard to extend this to fancybox support.
Does this look like the right thing to do?
- Martin
Index: lib/ui/stdmenus.ui
On czwartek 18 wrzesień 2003 12:50 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Has anybody thought about how 'support' would look like if everybody has
> a differen UI?
>
> Q: How do I xxx?
>
> A1: Layout->Paragraph
> A2: Edit->Paragraph Setting
> A3: ...
>
> This is creating confusion for no good reason.
Consider
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:29:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:04:32PM +0200, Pascal Francq wrote:
> > Hi, I have a request that could perhaps be a future feature of LyX
> > concerning the references. When the user inserts a label in a
> > document, LyX automa
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Has anybody thought about how 'support' would look like if everybody has
> a differen UI?
It's Friday *tomorrow* not today bud.
> This is creating confusion for no good reason.
I already get enough spam, thanks.
--
Khendon's Law:
Ling Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I didn't subscribe to the list since it has a huge volume of emails. I
> might have missed some discussion on making LyX RPMs like lyx-common,
> lyx-xforms and lyx-qt, though I did have checked the archive.
>
> I modified the lyx.spec file from lyx-1.3.2 source tree
Has anybody thought about how 'support' would look like if everybody has
a differen UI?
Q: How do I xxx?
A1: Layout->Paragraph
A2: Edit->Paragraph Setting
A3: ...
This is creating confusion for no good reason.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:34:40PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > in 1.4.0cvs, it's hidden by default under the Qt frontend, precisely
> > because it's fairly useless.
>
> Who made that decision?
I did. This was discussed at the time.
It's trivial for you to turn in permanently on if you want.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:04:32PM +0200, Pascal Francq wrote:
> Hi, I have a request that could perhaps be a future feature of LyX
> concerning the references. When the user inserts a label in a
> document, LyX automatically adds a prefix (for example "cha:" for a
> chapter). This means that ther
Hi,
I have a request that could perhaps be a future feature of LyX concerning the
references.
When the user inserts a label in a document, LyX automatically adds a prefix
(for example "cha:" for a chapter). This means that there exists a sort of
hierarchy between the labels. When you have a big
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> ps, see if you can trigger the bug with current cvs. Also the math one...
>
> Yes, the bug is gone. So is the math bug.
Good news indeed.
> These kind of bugs based upon unspecified compiler behaviour are hell
> to hunt down. I think we did our good deed for this week!
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:57:40PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> On Thursday 18 September 2003 11:58 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > your patch and apply mine. Yours is a work around broken behaviour.
> > > Mine cures the source of the breakage.
> >
> > I very much agree -- provided it work
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:09:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Seems like your knowledge of C++ 'evolves'...
>>
>> Would you have it any other way?
>
>
| BTW: The Guru oracle concluded that
>
|
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:09:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Seems like your knowledge of C++ 'evolves'...
>
> Would you have it any other way?
BTW: The Guru oracle concluded that
#include
class T;
typedef std
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:05:56PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> If you insist... But you won't stop me adding you to the changelogs.
> Before I apply, though, I want to have at least a "go" or "needs further
> discussion" from Jean-Marc and from Lars.
Don't get ridiculous.
Andre'
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Seems like your knowledge of C++ 'evolves'...
Would you have it any other way?
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Nonsense. It is your cake with my icing. Please apply yourself.
If you insist... But you won't stop me adding you to the changelogs.
Before I apply, though, I want to have at least a "go" or "needs further
discussion" from Jean-Marc and from Lars.
Juergen.
Jan-Åke Larsson wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I use it within LyX to calculate the 'ascent fraction' of the
> > snippet. (A snippet whose base line was in the middle of the image
> > would have an ascent fraction of 0.5.) The code that does this inside
> > LyX is (stripped down):
> >
>
> >
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Jürgen, I think that the attached patch is conceptually the same as your
>> original and (thanks to André) is easier to follow. Please review.
>
> Except for one typo (below): perfect. Many thanks!
> Since I do not want to claim the credit for
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen, I think that the attached patch is conceptually the same as your
> original and (thanks to André) is easier to follow. Please review.
Except for one typo (below): perfect. Many thanks!
Since I do not want to claim the credit for this undeservedly, I let you apply
th
On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 06:56 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
OK, I tried a less intrusive approach for now. Patch attached.
Ronald, I would appreciate if you could find time to check that this
patch works as intended, so that I can include it in 1.3.3.
The patch works fine: the \su
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Multiplication by zero?
Yes, I know. However, I decided not to pretend that I understand this
code, and thus decided to keep it as-is. The real problem is probably
that our fonts are broken, anyway...
What I wonder is whether we c
On Thursday 18 September 2003 11:58 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > your patch and apply mine. Yours is a work around broken behaviour.
> > Mine cures the source of the breakage.
>
> I very much agree -- provided it works. (Do you mean the dialogs.diff
> patch you posted here much earlier? But you ca
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:05:57AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Here's the patch.
>
> And I understand how it is triggered. We have a sort of 'race'
> condition between the destruction of two static variables.
>
> In gettext.C:
> Messages & getLyXMessages() {
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> +#if defined(__APPLE__) && defined(__GNUC__)
> +if (sym_->inset == "cmex") {
> +h_ = 4 * dim_.d / 5;
> +dim_.a += 0*h_;
Multiplication by zero?
--
Angus
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 06:37:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> My problem is, how do I do that? I do not have access to such
>> information in mathed... So what would be a good place?
John> lyx_gui::is_qt_mac()
John> I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | The use is that we can forward declare a ParagraphList without
> | #including "paragraph.h" in the header file.
> It is the legality of this I question.
Incidentally, the code in ParagraphList_fwd.h is conceptually identica
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:55:53AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Suitably abashed, I attach the patch.
> Some whitespace issues...
> Andre'
To paraphrase King Henry in T.S.Eliot's Murder in the Cathedral,
"Who will rid me of this pedantic German?
Jürgen, I think
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:18 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | Garst> |
> >>
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg60797.html
> >>
> >> | Thanks. Unfortunately, the patch i
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:55:53AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Suitably abashed, I attach the patch.
Some whitespace issues...
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:01:44AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> So, the remaining task is to ascertain which correction to apply.
>> Something like this (I have more energy this morning ;-) should do
>> it:
>
> Gosh.
>
> Too much C++ consumption is bad for your mental hea
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:07:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Afterall, it's a cache. No more. The only purpose of a cache is to speed
> | up things not to cobble things together.
>
> yes. but we know that if we have a rowcache we will need one for each
> BufferView LyXText combo. i.e.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:01:44AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> So, the remaining task is to ascertain which correction to apply.
> Something like this (I have more energy this morning ;-) should do
> it:
Gosh.
Too much C++ consumption is bad for your mental health.
> typedef std::pair StrPai
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:41:05AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> No. That is exacly it. You are not willing to lift your eyes off the
>> ground and see that we want this, and we should not make solutoins now
>> that makes this harder.
>>
>> IMHO
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> this looks very sophisticated :-)
> I have vaguely thought about something like this, but then I was not
> shure if it was worth the effort. Probably it is, though. I will
> happily adapt this (if we agree on the fix as such).
>
> Some question out of interest:
> 1. w
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:45:06AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > As the destruction order is the reversed construction order you
> > could specify a certain order if you need to.
>
> Let's just not go there in the first place.
Fine with me.
Andre'
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:41:05AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No. That is exacly it. You are not willing to lift your eyes off the
> ground and see that we want this, and we should not make solutoins now
> that makes this harder.
>
> IMHO you have already added coded that makes this harde
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> and you should have kept the changes in separate patches.
>>
> | That is a case of "the pot calling the kettle black" if ever I
> | heard one. Witness Garst's request for the lyx2lyx temporary file
> | patch to be backported to 1.3.x. A 5 line patch wrapped up in a
>
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> As the destruction order is the reversed construction order you
> could specify a certain order if you need to.
Let's just not go there in the first place.
--
Angus
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:27:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > >> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:27:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> | Andre> A ParIterator gives me a stack of the ParagraphLi
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:27:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > | Andre> A ParIterator gives me
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:27:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> | Andre> A ParIterator gives me a stack of the ParagraphLists involved.
> >
> | Andre> I want a stack of the
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:16:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>> | wrote:
| Not from me. Too much effort than I can afford right now.
Then _why_ did you be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Andre> A ParIterator gives me a stack of the ParagraphLists involved.
>
| Andre> I want a stack of the LyXTexts. Going from the LyXText to the
| Andre> ParagraphList 'below' is easy by
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:25:41AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> >> 3) I discovered a new (?) bug:
> >>
> >> a) create an inset, e.g., note;
> >> b) insert a math inset into it;
> >> c) copy and paste the math inset to inside the note i
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
>> 3) I discovered a new (?) bug:
>>
>> a) create an inset, e.g., note;
>> b) insert a math inset into it;
>> c) copy and paste the math inset to inside the note inset;
>> d) exit without saving.
>
> I don't see it.
No, it's going to be a com
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:16:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> | wrote:
>>> | Not from me. Too much effort than I can afford right now.
>>>
>>> Then _why_ did you begin cleanup at all?
>>
> | The same reason why I star
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Here's the patch.
And I understand how it is triggered. We have a sort of 'race'
condition between the destruction of two static variables.
In gettext.C:
Messages & getLyXMessages() {
static Messages lyx_messages;
return lyx_messages;
}
In Dialogs.C
names
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> A ParIterator gives me a stack of the ParagraphLists involved.
Andre> I want a stack of the LyXTexts. Going from the LyXText to the
Andre> ParagraphList 'below' is easy by using 'ownerParagraphs'. I
Andre> need the other direction.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> 3) I discovered a new (?) bug:
>
> a) create an inset, e.g., note;
> b) insert a math inset into it;
> c) copy and paste the math inset to inside the note inset;
> d) exit without saving.
I don't see it.
Alfredo
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 06:35:10PM +0100, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Yes! This does the trick.
>
> Great! I wonder what changed between 13x and 14x in this regard.
>
> > Shall I prepare a patch?
>
> Why not.
Here's the patch.
Notes:
1) To suppress the bug, it w
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:55:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> | | On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:38:14PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:32:52PM +0200, Lars Gull
59 matches
Mail list logo
