Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:16:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>> | wrote:
>>>> | Not from me. Too much effort than I can afford right now.
>>>>
>>>> Then _why_ did you begin cleanup at all?
>>>
>> | The same reason why I start cleaning the flat the day before an
>> | exam. I don't want to learn for the exam, so I do something that
>> | 'needs to be done'.
>>>
>>>> You should have stuck with _just_ the counter changes.
>>>
>> | Not enough fun for a whole weekend.
>>
>> and you should have kept the changes in separate patches.
>
| That is a case of "the pot calling the kettle black" if ever I heard
| one. Witness Garst's request for the lyx2lyx temporary file patch to
| be backported to 1.3.x. A 5 line patch wrapped up in a hundred lines
| of noise.
>
| ;-)
"Do as I say, not as I Do"
besides, I stumbled upon Garst's problem when I did other work.
So the patch sent to the list is not "make lyx2lyx use a file" it was
really "cleanup stuff with lyxlex usage and debugging messages"
But sure they should have been split.
--
Lgb
