On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:57:40PM +0000, Angus Leeming spake thusly: > On Thursday 18 September 2003 11:58 am, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > your patch and apply mine. Yours is a work around broken behaviour. > > > Mine cures the source of the breakage. > > > > I very much agree -- provided it works. (Do you mean the dialogs.diff > > patch you posted here much earlier? But you called that yourself > > 'curing by hiding', not a fix. What should I believe?) > > I did, but only because I did not understand the problem. > > I think I've explained why the bug was triggered, why I'm treating its cause > and why you are treating the synptoms. > > Without your detective work, however, we wouldn't understand what the symptoms > mean and whether the proposed cure will be successful. Now we do. > > Convinced yet? > Angus > > ps, see if you can trigger the bug with current cvs. Also the math one...
Yes, the bug is gone. So is the math bug. These kind of bugs based upon unspecified compiler behaviour are hell to hunt down. I think we did our good deed for this week! However #1366 is still there. Any chance it may have a similar background? - Martin
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
