> Are you sure LxY can find kpsewhich? Check your PATHs.
> I got caught by that. My ~/.profile did not have a PATH to kpesewhich.
>
I'm not sure this is the problem.. looks like it just gives warnings as
Jean-Pierre pointed out..
Folks, the problem still persists - none of my bibliographies ar
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:23:28PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Gosh this was hard to track. John, I think you are the one to blame here, so
> please apply this. ;)
Hmm, I guess undo is more obscure than I thought. I'll look later,
thanks
john
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:20:35PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> suitable for manual editing. Being able to search for emphasized text
> etc. would be a BIG step towards a comfortable text processor. If this
This will definitely not happen until we have character styles
regards
john
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:42:32PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I can spend a
> > bit more time on the LyX project, in particular on testing and writing
> > bug reports. Is there already a release schedule for the next version?
> > Does it make sense to flood bugzilla with reports at this stage
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:16:38PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> Does any of the -dbg flags output the sequence of lfuns (preferably with
> their arguments) as they are called?
Not really.
> I was thinking that this could be useful when explaining how to repeat
> something that provoke
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:21:37PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> And talking about error boxes, what about nuking them and implementing
> instead an error log window doubly linked with the document (i.e. cliking
> on a log line puts the cursor within problem in the document, navigating on
>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:30:52PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Curious, I tried it again and indeed it did not work. Either your kharma
> or my stupidity is mind boggling :) Works after your patch tho.
xforms frontend, right?
> Thanks,
>Garst
>
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> > Not
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Hmm, in current CVS undo is working for me. But I did see the failure
> when it was reported. Maybe John already fixed it.
Not for me:
1
2
doesn't do anything here.
Alfredo
Hi folks,
Here is a patch to current cvs to get chapter labels centered in the LyX
window. The current behavior is to center the Chapter name, but
left-justify the "Chapter N" label to the beginning of the chapter name.
Check lyx-users archive for subject "Layout: How to center counter_chapter
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi all,
> after finishing my PhD and making the final presentation,
Congratulations!
> I can spend a
> bit more time on the LyX project, in particular on testing and writing
> bug reports. Is there already a release schedule for the next version?
> Does it make sense to
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I see this undo failure as well.
Gosh this was hard to track. John, I think you are the one to blame here, so
please apply this. ;)
Alfredo
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/ChangeLog
Hi all,
after finishing my PhD and making the final presentation, I can spend a
bit more time on the LyX project, in particular on testing and writing
bug reports. Is there already a release schedule for the next version?
Does it make sense to flood bugzilla with reports at this stage of
devel
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> And talking about error boxes, what about nuking them and implementing
> instead an error log window doubly linked with the document (i.e. cliking
> on a log line puts the cursor within problem in the document, navigat
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> There is the problem of the insertion of the latex error boxes. (that's
> one of the reasons why the code is so ugly... there are a lot of bv's
> flying around and so)
And talking about error boxes, what about nuking them and implementing
instead an error log window d
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I've got a Table of contents, list of figures and list of
> > tables just after each other. Right-clicking on either one brings up the
> > pop-up menu for the table of contents.
> >
> > Is this a bug, or s
Hi
Does any of the -dbg flags output the sequence of lfuns (preferably with
their arguments) as they are called?
I was thinking that this could be useful when explaining how to repeat
something that provokes a bug.
In a similar manner, getting a less cluttered output from -dbg key would
be ni
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got a Table of contents, list of figures and list of
> tables just after each other. Right-clicking on either one brings up the
> pop-up menu for the table of contents.
>
> Is this a bug, or something that's not been implemented yet?
Neither. There is
Hi
I've got a Table of contents, list of figures and list of
tables just after each other. Right-clicking on either one brings up the
pop-up menu for the table of contents.
Is this a bug, or something that's not been implemented yet?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> John Levon wrote:
>>
>>> Not on the status bar. Have a cenetered modal progress dialog by all
>>> means. Feel free to do so.
>>
>> Do you think that there's no hope in asyncroneous latexing/export?
>>
>> Alfredo
>
> Why not?
>
> The latex
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Why not?
>
> The latex export is complicated by the need to parse the latex log file in
> order to ascertain whether latex needs to be run again. It seems to me
> that you have two possible strategies:
>
> You have two choices.
> 1 (simple to implement): keep this control
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> No, no, you got me all wrong ;) (and yes, I took once a look at the latex
> export code in export.C and it scared the hell out of me). I mean, wont it
> better to have the progress bar on the status bar for asyncroneous (or
> a
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:37:16PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> > Well, we still need a recipe on how to get this. But, I've rewritten all
regard
john
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
>> Not on the status bar. Have a cenetered modal progress dialog by all
>> means. Feel free to do so.
>
> Do you think that there's no hope in asyncroneous latexing/export?
>
> Alfredo
Why not?
The latex export is complicated by the need to par
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > No surprise.. it's difficult to explain in words.. here's a screenshot:
> > http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bugs/Citation_dialog_not_showing_info.png
> > the bug is that no informa
John Levon wrote:
>> Do you think that there's no hope in asyncroneous latexing/export?
>
> You look like just the right candidate to do it !!
No, no, you got me all wrong ;) (and yes, I took once a look at the latex
export code in export.C and it scared the hell out of me). I mean, wont it
bet
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > Not on the status bar. Have a cenetered modal progress dialog by all
> > means. Feel free to do so.
>
> Do you think that there's no hope in asyncroneous latexing/export?
You look like just the right candidate to do it !!
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > No surprise.. it's difficult to explain in words.. here's a screenshot:
> > http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bugs/Citation_dialog_not_showing_info.png
> > the bug is that no informa
John Levon wrote:
> Not on the status bar. Have a cenetered modal progress dialog by all
> means. Feel free to do so.
Do you think that there's no hope in asyncroneous latexing/export?
Alfredo
wild idea... would it make sense to have a progressbar on the statusbar
showing the status of loading, texing, exporting...?
Alfredo
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:44:35PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> wild idea... would it make sense to have a progressbar on the statusbar
> showing the status of loading, texing, exporting...?
Not on the status bar. Have a cenetered modal progress dialog by all
means. Feel free to do so.
It'
John Levon wrote:
> It's already applied ... by me
Thanks John. Anyway, I think it's pretty safe. And it even does what the old
comment says...(I hope it's not forbidden for code and comments to agree ;)
Regards, Alfredo
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:12:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Get somebody else to test is at well, and if the verdict is "This
> works" then get it applied.
It's already applied ... by me
john
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> No surprise.. it's difficult to explain in words.. here's a screenshot:
> http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bugs/Citation_dialog_not_showing_info.png
> the bug is that no information is shown about the selected citation,
> Ad
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:33:38AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Does it make any sense ?
>
> As far as LaTeX is concerned, I think one can do these kind of stupid
> things. An example would be wanting to present side by side some latex
> code using appendix and the result of this co
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
|
| > Lars, what should I do with this? It still works without problems for me,
| > and the bug is still there in current cvs (, a, enter, up: the
| > bottom of the document raises too much, i.e. the row has wrong height).
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Peter Dimov wrote:
| > I suspect that most people just use editor inheritance or specialize
| > ~scoped_ptr.
|
| I don't know what "editor inheritance" is.
Copy & Paste and make your own modified version.
| Nonetheless, inheritance here is
| interest
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > This dialog needs an overhaul. I think Search stuff should move to a
> > separate semi-modal dialog, this leaves more space. Of course, we should
> > make sure that this is quickly accessible, for the academic types.
> >
>
> As an academic wit
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > * Going to a reference that is not in the current document gives:
> > > Error Couldn't find this label in current document.
> > > Suggestion: Either disable the goto functionality when referring to a
> > > document that is not the current docum
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Opinions? Objections to filing it as an enhancement request?
>
> No need for it. I am more than mildly annoyed by this behaviour myself.
> Unfortunately there is no obvious soluti
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:45:03PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > * What about adding a way to manually specify the name of a citation?
>
> This will complicate the dialog ... not good... I'm not sure but
> Qt doesn't seem to let QListBox's do th
On Friday 04 April 2003 04:46, John Levon wrote:
> This still needs fixing ... just give me a couple of clues and I'll try
> myself
I have some time today I will try to take a look into it.
My approach will be in two phases:
* run the file you sent me over lyx-1.1.6fix4 and see how ly
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:04:51PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > This might be the correct behaviour, but it's a bit unintuitive - maybe
>
> It is correct, and it is a bit unintuitive.
>
> > it would be better if you got an error message or a
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Does it make any sense ?
As far as LaTeX is concerned, I think one can do these kind of stupid
things. An example would be wanting to present side by side some latex
code using appendix and the result of this code (in a latex manual).
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:57:14PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> All should now be fine. Will take a little time to filter through
>> to the official page.
John> hmm what was wrong ? Sorry, I went to bed and forgot to check it
John> wo
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:37:20PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > We could certainly have a HACKING, but why would we bother the
>> user > with a load of stuff they don't care about ?
>>
>> Your HACKING and my status are the same thin
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
John>
>> So the last two numbers are basically the same information?
John> Yes
>> And the last column sums to 1?
John> 100
Erm, yes.
JMarc
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:30:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> but it had no effect.
John> Then I do not know what can be done.
OK, let's assume it is by construction, then. It feels a bit like java
apps (or mozilla pre
47 matches
Mail list logo
